Drawing from your Historiographical Research Paper, create a presentation (using PowerPoint, Screencast-o-Matic, or other presentation software) examining an archival institution that coincides with t

16

Class Structure and the Shaping of Society

Rama Toulon

Grand Canyon University

HIS-565

Instructor: Professor Tristan Cabello

Date: March 22, 2024

Class Structure and the Shaping of Society

Introduction

Class structure has profoundly shaped societies across history. While early communities organized themselves along varying models, hierarchies of social stratification became deeply entrenched over time through the rise of civilizations, states, and industrial economies. Scholars have studied how class formations developed through different modes of production, as well as the diverse mechanisms societies employed to maintain established class divisions. Examining the lived experiences defined by socioeconomic positioning and ensuing debates over determinism also provides crucial perspectives on relationships between the material base and cultural superstructure. Moreover, class analysis illuminates broader historical transformations and has applicability beyond localized contexts. The study of class through historiography therefore offers valuable insights into the dynamic between hierarchical structures and human agents that have structured civilizations both traditionally and today.

Development of Class Structures

Early scholars had varied perspectives on the development of class structures throughout history. In the late 19th century, Marxist scholars argued that class divisions emerged concurrently with the onset of private property and capitalism1. As some communities transitioned from feudalism to industrial modes of production, the bourgeoisie class accumulated capital through ownership of the means of production while the proletariat class was left only with their labor power to sell. Karl Marx viewed this antagonism between the bourgeois private owners and alienated worker classes as driving the perpetual conflict and evolution of economic systems.

Other scholars studying for older civilizations proposed alternative theories. In his extensive anthropological research of tribal communities, Lewis Henry Morgan observed that early human societies transitioned through stages of development from savage tribes to barbarism and eventually civilization as increasing mastery of hunting, farming, and handicrafts allowed for greater specialization2. He viewed this as correlated with the emergence of classes separated by military, handicraft, and higher ranks. Bronisław Malinowski's fieldwork examining exchange networks in the western Pacific Trobriand Islands led him to argue that stratified positions first developed among clan chiefs and specialized traders or producers to facilitate cooperative sharing in primitive communities.

By the early 20th century, the rise of archaeology expanded perspectives to prehistoric eras. V.G. Childe's study of ancient Near Eastern remains demonstrated centralized bureaucracies and social hierarchies marked early urban civilizations like Sumer. Conflicting with Marxist structure, class divisions preceded large-scale private ownership3. Gordon Childe proposed "Oriental despotism" as an early form of governance where elite religious and military leaders controlled complex production and distribution systems to provide for commoners4. These suggested classes were a social necessity for coordinating large, settled populations rather than deriving strictly from economic relations.

Maintenance of Class Systems

Scholars have closely examined the various mechanisms societies have employed to maintain established class structures through time. Early stratification depended on traditional authority holding sway over populations. Weber analyzed how charismatic rule could transition into patrimonial administration where leaders secured absolute dominion over followers through distribution of resources and patronage. This personally governed system formed the basis of many ancient empires' upper classes retaining control. Meanwhile, legal codes like Hammurabi's Babylonian laws institutionalized class hierarchies by governing social behaviors, property rights, and criminal penalties according to status groups.

As urbanized states adopted the administrative aspects of centralized government, elite ruling class reproduction was accomplished through education and certification methods. The University of Stavanger, distinguished by the blessing of church leaders and monarchs, had to study to obtain a certificate. Ultimately, more precise education standardized hierarchies and different instructional courses bring up the youth based on the order. On the contrary, in late imperial China, the civil service exam was held annually in Beijing to select gentry-grade scholars to take the positions of Mandarins, and court officials reproduced political hierarchies favoring people with higher degrees of education.

Religion also played a for playing a recognizing the earthly powers validated by the heavenly permission. Leaders who ruled Egypt and Japan were divine kings as their regime was the-political, which regarded power-centralization as a cosmic order. Hinduism, in the form of the Varna system of the class, has established the caste system of Indian society and made mobility between occupations impossible. In Latin America, a ‘syncretic Catholicism’ was used to impregnate those spirits, which were present already in the local culture, to support the colonial spatial regime of slavery where the working productivity of people mattered, among others5. Weber examined why it is that, on the one hand, the Protestant doctrine of predestination within vocational callings secured the stratification of capitalist structure and, on the other hand, provided the workman with a diligent worker mentality by being faithful in the duties and estates of the work. Historical and political arrangements totaled with education and pre-eminent values to reinforce class-based distributions of leadership, resources, and prestige spanning cross-culturally for many centuries that was done cross. Scholars still felicitate for better comprehending such causal mechanisms, delving into what the inner logic relations are and how they evolve along with the changes in economic and political circumstances.

Class and Social Relations

Capitalism, the earliest to have developed stand to be viewed in the perspective of the first Marxist theory of societal expressions under the industrial revolution. Emile Durkheim sought to explain mainly, how the natural feeling of solidarity among workers arose out of economic specialization and industrial urban cities integrating the industrial workers despite their competition for the same wage6. On the other side, contacts decreased in the sense of individual as mass consciousness shift toward the class representatives which owned and managed the huge machine-driven factories in the hands of the bourgeoisie. Urban poverty investigations of the Booth and Rowntree highlighted the oppressive impact of poverty on intensely personal lifestyle and formed those communities standing for some living standards.

Micro-historical studies also later came to shine some light on different class stands of pre-industrial times7. E.P Thompson challenged the notion of a single and all-encompassing "peasant culture" by pointing out the pre-existence of deep strata also within the rural English village with the families of cottagers and tenant farmers living in separate houses, taxed in their different ways and different legal jurisdiction affecting important aspects of family life, integrity and mobility. Also, a good amount of village sociality was oriented towards minutiae that served the purpose to still channel people to where they stick to their class.

Cultural devastation is another major contribution of this branch of anthropology. The laws and regulations set by the South Asian caste system state the rules concerning occupations, food habits, and ritual rank of each caste. Therefore, this unifying factor for the spheres of life from traditional family formations to localized economies became the hereditary factor endogamous groups where members can marry nothing outside the group. Like Mintz did, Caribbean plantation economies divide socially into two worlds, one of provision grounds and Muslim and ones of great house planners and their lifestyle.

Recent research, on the other hand, tends to focus more on the in-between space that blurs boundaries between time and regions. He demonstrated that since industrialization shattered old socioeconomic patterns, new and meritocratic careers emerged. It would be the field of pragmatism8. Anderson emphasized the fact that although classes were very different thanks to agriculture exports such as silk and urban folklore cultural differences and society still survived through social order models. While in some accounts, class determinism still continues to exhibit, the same perspective is also overlooked due to our humans' ability to add values and construct community and change amid the complexity of life.

Economic Determinism vs Cultural Influences

The discussion goes on with the economists taking various sides on whether the rigidity of economic structure or the social norms and values are the stronger ones in determining class stratification. Instruction by Marxist historical materialism, structuralists are mainly interested in modes of production and property relations as the sources of the class-determined division of society9. Hence, they later note that the classes define people`s political, religion, and family roles. Caste is placed firmly at the center of the struggle for justice as an economic order composed of those in the system who are exploited by others. Polanyi mentioned being against the fiction economy, arguing that the non-market social safeguards were the fundamentals of early societies' balance in the counter direction of the laissez-faire ideology of commodification push.

Alternatively, culturalist theories accentuate ideational factors in class analysis. Weber rejected Marx's reduction of class solely to ownership of means of production, proposing status groups as also defined by noneconomic attributes like education, lifestyle and values which intersected with markets10. Bourdieu analyzed how cultural capital was inherited and competed for through distinctive "habitus" reproducing hierarchies independently of material conditions alone. Foucault addressed power more diffusely circulating through discourse and disciplinary forces normalizing subjectivities beyond workplaces.

Synthesizing perspectives, newer analyses propose the dialectical interplay between material and ideational realms. S Melser addressed how cultural schemas ideology and social relations could react upon the economic base reciprocally shaping class identities11. Conflict and pluralist theories also emphasize groups strategically positioning class interests through cultural as well as economic contestation dependent on historical contexts12. Debate remains lively regarding structure versus agency while most agree a balanced, nuanced approach is needed.

Methodological Approaches

Scholars have employed diverse methodological tools to study class structures across disciplines. Early Marxist historians grounded research in historical materialism, analyzing how successive modes of production like feudalism and capitalism necessarily generated corresponding class formations and conflicts evidenced through artifacts like legal codes and political treatises13. This macro-level approach linked broad economic changes to stratified social organizations. Quantitative methods also facilitated class-focused study. Census data permitted depicting shifting occupational distributions and analyzing social mobilities within populations14. Survey techniques probed intra-generational fluidities while quantitative indicators tracked intergenerational educational and income transmissions between classes. Combined with qualitative documents, numbers elucidated population-wide trends balancing case-study particularities.

On the other hand, micro-historical methods, which are more recent revealed complexities of the life of those studied. Oral histories written in the subject’s narratives became a source to dispel the upper dominant abstractions by revealing a set of subcultures, worldviews, and everyday survival interests, which include negotiations and conflicts. Through ethnography, scholars got to walk into the labyrinths of local class cultures, where they could recognize the unique logic and customs, hoping to hide in large-scale datasets. Genealogical evidence revealing parents' ties from ancestral to spousal units are intensely weighted against prominent theories of status-identity on the micro level. In such a development stage, all quantitative and qualitative methods and tools are now significant. Statistical models allow target research made up of case studies to help verify causal connections, not only correlations. Integrating archival documentation with ethnography or material culture studies illuminates multilayered relationships between objective conditions and subjective meanings for reconciling structure and agency. Triangulated multi-method research thus captures the class's lived fullness in history.

Areas for Further Research

There are many fruitful areas for future research into how class structures have interacted and evolved over time. One understudied topic is examining the intersections of class with gender and race. Scholars could investigate how hierarchies of class compounded with inequalities along these other axes15. For instance, the differing experiences of working-class men compared to women, or racial minorities within the same occupational categories. Expounding on these intersecting identity attributes would give a richer and more nuanced understanding of hierarchical societies.

Another promising avenue is analyzing the impacts of increasing globalization on class structures, both historically and in the modern world. As trade, migration and communication networks have connected more people and economies internationally, this has implications for how socioeconomic stratifications form and are maintained16. Debates around the rise of a new "transnational capitalist class" show globalization is reconfiguring relationships between labor and ownership on a global scale17. Tracing these dynamic changes over eras of imperialism or market integration would lend insights into class's fluid nature in response to macro historical shifts.

One underrepresented area is exploring non-Western regions and historical periods. Much class analysis to date has centered urban industrializing societies, but agrarian and non-capitalist formations deserve more examination. Examples include feudal systems in Asia or Africa, caste-based societies in South Asia, and indigenous class structures predating colonization18. Illuminating divergent class logics in diverse cultural-historical contexts could strengthen understandings of class as a category by highlighting alternatives to Western European norms. Investigating understudied time periods and world areas would expand the comparative breadth and deepen theories of class development.

Conclusion

Therefore, the historiography of class structures demonstrates both commonalities and variations in stratified social organizations over time and space. While economic factors produced tensions between labor and capital especially under industrialism, cultural norms also intersected to reproduce hierarchies. Diverse societies institutionalized class divisions through mechanisms tailored to specific political and ideological circumstances. Lived experiences and identities depended on structural positioning as mediated by human agency. Moreover, class studies continue evolving methodologically to capture its intricacies. Examining underrepresented periods and regions globally as well as intersections with other axes of difference can provide new perspectives. Going forward, further nuanced analyses balancing structure and agency offer potential to clarify class's dynamic role in organizing resources, power relations and collective identities crucial to civilization.

Bibliography

Blanchard, Jessica W., Simon Outram, Gloria Tallbull, and Charmaine DM Royal. "“We Don’t Need a Swab in Our Mouth to Prove Who We Are” Identity, Resistance, and Adaptation of Genetic Ancestry Testing among Native American Communities." Current anthropology 60, no. 5 (2019): 637-655.

Dalevska, Nataliya, Valentyna Khobta, Aleksy Kwilinski, and Sergey Kravchenko. "A model for estimating social and economic indicators of sustainable development." Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues 6, no. 4 (2019): 1839.

Giddens, Anthony. "The class structure of the advanced societies." In Social Stratification, Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective, Second Edition, pp. 152-162. Routledge, 2019.

Kaushik, Vibha, and Christine A. Walsh. "Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research." Social sciences 8, no. 9 (2019): 255.

Khan, Gohar F., Marko Sarstedt, Wen-Lung Shiau, Joseph F. Hair, Christian M. Ringle, and Martin P. Fritze. "Methodological research on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An analysis based on social network approaches." Internet Research 29, no. 3 (2019): 407-429.

Lane, Kevin P., and David Lane. The socialist industrial state. Routledge, 2019.

Leach, Edmund Ronald. Political systems of highland Burma: a study of Kachin social structure. Routledge, 2021.

Mehan, Hugh. "Understanding inequality in schools: the contribution of interpretative studies." In Handbuch Bildungs-und Erziehungssoziologie, pp. 1-20. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2022.

Schapera, Isaac. The ethnic composition of Tswana tribes. Routledge, 2021.

Stark, Werner. The sociology of knowledge: Toward a deeper understanding of the history of ideas. Routledge, 2020.

Wacquant, Löic JD. "Making class: the middle class (es) in social theory and social structure." In Bringing class back In, pp. 39-64. Routledge, 2019.

Wadhwani, R. Daniel, David Kirsch, Friederike Welter, William B. Gartner, and Geoffrey G. Jones. "Context, time, and change: Historical approaches to entrepreneurship research." Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 14, no. 1 (2020): 3-19.

1"The class structure of the advanced societies."

2"“We Don’t Need a Swab in Our Mouth to Prove Who We Are” Identity, Resistance, and Adaptation of Genetic Ancestry Testing among Native American Communities."

3Political systems of highland Burma: a study of Kachin social structure.

4The ethnic composition of Tswana tribes.

5"“We Don’t Need a Swab in Our Mouth to Prove Who We Are”

6"Understanding inequality in schools: the contribution of interpretative studies."

7"Context, time, and change: Historical approaches to entrepreneurship research."

8"Context, time, and change: Historical approaches to entrepreneurship research."

9"Understanding inequality in schools: the contribution of interpretative studies."

10The sociology of knowledge: Toward a deeper understanding of the history of ideas.

11The socialist industrial state.

12"Making class: the middle class (es) in social theory and social structure."

13"Methodological research on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An analysis based on social network approaches."

14"A model for estimating social and economic indicators of sustainable development."

15"Context, time, and change: Historical approaches to entrepreneurship research."

16"A model for estimating social and economic indicators of sustainable development."

17"Context, time, and change: Historical approaches to entrepreneurship research."

18"Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research."