The primary goal of this literature review is to integrate concepts from four different content domains within the larger field of psychology. The four content domains should be chosen from previous c
Running head: INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW 1
Integrative Literature Review
Name
PSY/699
Instructor name
Date
Biological Psychology
Delgado, N., Caridad, M., Salabert Tortoló, I., Morales Díaz, M., Mestre Cárdenas, V. A., Alfonso, G., ... & Toledo Martínez, T. E. (2017). La motivación en los estudiantes de primer año de la carrera de Medicina. Curso 2015-2016. Revista Médica Electrónica, 39(4), 906-915.
Garfinkel, S. N., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2015). Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological psychology, 104, 65-74.
Lazarević, L. B., Bošnjak, M., Knežević, G., Petrović, B., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., ... & Bodroža, B. (2016). Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality. Zeitschrift für Psychologie.
Liu, R. T. (2017). The microbiome as a novel paradigm in studyinng stress and mental health. American Psychologist, 72(7), 655.
Page, D. (2015). Suzanne Higgs, Alison Cooper, Jonathan Lee and Mike Harris, Biological Psychology.
van Rijn, H. (2014). It's time to take the psychology of biological time into account: speed of driving affects a trip's subjective duration. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1028.
Rationale
Biopsychology is the process of using biology and its principles in the study of the behavior of people that the mental processes that they have. I have chosen six articles that were published in several journals. It means that the information in them is very valid and is reliable. The text is also readable as the content is written and the English used is relatively simple. The information in the research papers can also be generalized as all human are the same and most biological systems that lead to some behavior are also the same. The primary rationale for the inclusion is that the natural systems have a significant influence on the psychology of a person and the response that they put in place.
Cognitive Psychology
Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D. G., & Spector, J. M. (2015). Interactions between cognitive psychology, educational technology, and computing in the digital age. Technology, knowledge and learning, 20(2), 129-131.
Mathiassen, S. E., & Sörqvist, P. (2018). Ergonomics observation: development of efficient methods based on cognitive psychology. In 20th Congress International Ergonomics Association; Florens; 26-30 augusti 2018.
Primi, R. (2014). Developing a fluid intelligence scale through a combination of Rasch modeling and cognitive psychology. Psychological assessment, 26(3), 774.
Proctor, R. W., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2016). Functional relations and cognitive psychology: Lessons from human performance and animal research. International Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 58-63.
Putnam, A. L., Sungkhasettee, V. W., & Roediger III, H. L. (2016). Optimizing learning in college: tips from cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 652-660.
Stedman, J. M., Spalding, T. L., & Gagné, C. L. (2016). Does Functionalism Offer an Adequate Account of Cognitive Psychology? Journal of Mind & Behavior, 37(2).
Rationale
Cognitive psychology is a psychology that has its primary focus on the thoughts that people have and their cognition and trying to understand how they affect the decision making of a person. The rationale for involving this is to help understand how people decide in the real world. The information available is very generalizable because it makes use of the examples that are normal in the society and applicable in the lives of many people. The information is very valid as the articles are all peer-reviewed and they are published in respectable journals. The language used in these articles is also straightforward, and it makes it easy to read and understand the various principles that are suggested.
Social and Personality Psychology
Bardi, A., & Zentner, M. (2017). Grand Challenges for Personality and Social Psychology: Moving beyond the Replication Crisis. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2068.
Brown, A. J., & Goh, J. X. (2016). Some evidence for a gender gap in personality and social psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(5), 437-443.
Klein, W. M., Rothman, A. J., & Cameron, L. D. (2013). Theoretical innovations in social and personality psychology and implications for health: Introduction to special issue. Health Psychology, 32(5), 457.
Humberg, S., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2018). Response Surface Analysis in personality and social psychology: checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1948550618757600.
Međedović, J. (2018). What can human personality psychology learn from behavioral ecology?. Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, DC: 1983).
Wood, W. (2017). Habit in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(4), 389-403.
Rationale
The social psychology looks into the aspect of how other people’s presence affects the thoughts and feelings of other people. It is the analysis of the everyday life of people and the reasons as to why people behave in a particular manner. The information that is in the research provided is very readable and applicable in the real-life situations. The information is also very valid and appropriate in the real world. Such is because the methods used to research consideration are accurate and have been proven to be a representation of the situation on the ground. The rationale of the information that is offered is also apparent and is one that covers the ability to interact with other human beings and their capabilities. The information is also valid as the content includes articles that are peer reviewed.
Developmental Psychology
Chung, D. (2018). The Eight Stages of Psychosocial Protective Development: Developmental Psychology. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 8(06), 369.
Chryssochoou, X., & Barrett, M. (2017). Youth Politicization Viewed From the Perspectives of Social Psychology and Developmental Psychology.
Cleary, H. (2017). Applying the lessons of developmental psychology to the study of juvenile interrogations: New directions for research, policy, and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(1), 118.
Dobermann, D., & Hamilton, I. S. (2017). Publication patterns in developmental psychology: Trends and social networks. International Journal of Psychology, 52(4), 336-347.
Farrell, A. H., Semplonius, T., Shapira, M., Zhou, X., Laurence, S., Willoughby, T., ... & Evans, A. D. (2016). Research activity in Canadian developmental psychology programs. Canadian Psychology/psychologie canadienne, 57(2), 76.
Whitehead III, G. I., Smith, S. H., & Losonczy-Marshall, M. (2017). Core References in Introductory Social Psychology and Developmental Psychology Textbooks. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16(1), 6-18.
Rationale
Developmental psychology is the study of how people develop across all their lifespans and the changes that occur within their period. The articles selected are valid because they are written by reputable researchers, and they are also published in recognized journals. The information can also be generalized because the sample sizes used by the researchers were excellent and covered a large group of people. The people utilized in the research also cover different fields, and this makes it possible to have a valid sample group. Lastly, the rationale for involving this specific item is that I need to understand the process of development and how it affects people. The information is also very readable and applicable in many ways.
References
Bardi, A., & Zentner, M. (2017). Grand Challenges for Personality and Social Psychology: Moving beyond the Replication Crisis. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2068.
Brown, A. J., & Goh, J. X. (2016). Some evidence for a gender gap in personality and social psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(5), 437-443.
Chung, D. (2018). The Eight Stages of Psychosocial Protective Development: Developmental Psychology. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 8(06), 369.
Chryssochoou, X., & Barrett, M. (2017). Youth Politicization Viewed From the Perspectives of Social Psychology and Developmental Psychology.
Cleary, H. (2017). Applying the lessons of developmental psychology to the study of juvenile interrogations: New directions for research, policy, and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(1), 118.
Delgado, N., Caridad, M., Salabert Tortoló, I., Morales Díaz, M., Mestre Cárdenas, V. A., Alfonso, G., ... & Toledo Martínez, T. E. (2017). La motivación en los estudiantes de primer año de la carrera de Medicina. Curso 2015-2016. Revista Médica Electrónica, 39(4), 906-915.
Dobermann, D., & Hamilton, I. S. (2017). Publication patterns in developmental psychology: Trends and social networks. International Journal of Psychology, 52(4), 336-347.
Farrell, A. H., Semplonius, T., Shapira, M., Zhou, X., Laurence, S., Willoughby, T., ... & Evans, A. D. (2016). Research activity in Canadian developmental psychology programs. Canadian Psychology/psychologie canadienne, 57(2), 76.
Garfinkel, S. N., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2015). Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological psychology, 104, 65-74.
Humberg, S., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2018). Response Surface Analysis in personality and social psychology: checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1948550618757600.
Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D. G., & Spector, J. M. (2015). Interactions between cognitive psychology, educational technology, and computing in the digital age. Technology, knowledge and learning, 20(2), 129-131.
Klein, W. M., Rothman, A. J., & Cameron, L. D. (2013). Theoretical innovations in social and personality psychology and implications for health: Introduction to special issue. Health Psychology, 32(5), 457.
Lazarević, L. B., Bošnjak, M., Knežević, G., Petrović, B., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., ... & Bodroža, B. (2016). Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality. Zeitschrift für Psychologie.
Liu, R. T. (2017). The microbiome as a novel paradigm in studying stress and mental health. American Psychologist, 72(7), 655.
Mathiassen, S. E., & Sörqvist, P. (2018). Ergonomics observation: development of efficient methods based on cognitive psychology. In 20th Congress International Ergonomics Association; Florens; 26-30 augusti 2018.
Međedović, J. (2018). What can human personality psychology learn from behavioral ecology?. Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, DC: 1983).
Page, D. (2015). Suzanne Higgs, Alison Cooper, Jonathan Lee and Mike Harris, Biological Psychology.
Primi, R. (2014). Developing a fluid intelligence scale through a combination of Rasch modeling and cognitive psychology. Psychological assessment, 26(3), 774.
Proctor, R. W., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2016). Functional relations and cognitive psychology: Lessons from human performance and animal research. International Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 58-63.
Putnam, A. L., Sungkhasettee, V. W., & Roediger III, H. L. (2016). Optimizing learning in college: tips from cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 652-660.
Stedman, J. M., Spalding, T. L., & Gagné, C. L. (2016). Does Functionalism Offer an Adequate Account of Cognitive Psychology? Journal of Mind & Behavior, 37(2).
van Rijn, H. (2014). It's time to take the psychology of biological time into account: speed of driving affects a trip's subjective duration. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1028.
Whitehead III, G. I., Smith, S. H., & Losonczy-Marshall, M. (2017). Core References in Introductory Social Psychology and Developmental Psychology Textbooks. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16(1), 6-18.
Wood, W. (2017). Habit in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(4), 389-403.