I will like you to work on this Evidence- base work for nursing program. I have attached the guideline and PICO draft with references to assist in writing the paper. I do not want plagiarism . I will
Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?
In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest for the Assignment.
Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. NOTE: Be sure to include the link between the area of interest and the development of your PICO(t) question.
Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. (NOTE: Make sure the references on the slide presentation follows the APA format. Otherwise, points will be lost. Please see rubric for further criteria!
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.
NOTE: Only use evidence that has been published in the last five (5) years!!!!. By doing so, your project will be based on the most current evidence. If you want to use a classic, older article, reach out to your professor and receive written permission to do so. Otherwise, the reference will not count.
GRADE RUBRIC
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews | 81 (81%) - 90 (90%) The presentation clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest. | 72 (72%) - 80 (80%) The presentation accurately identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. | 63 (63%) - 71 (71%) The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. | 0 (0%) - 62 (62%) The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest or is missing. |
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: | 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. | 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. | 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. | 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. |
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: | 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. | 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
Total Points: 100 |