Instructions Submit the third milestone of your final project. Scenario #2 You are working the midnight shift as a police officer. You receive a call to respond to a one-car accident where the car le
JUS 455 Final Project Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric Overview : For this milestone , you will answer the following questi ons about the scenario you chos e in Milestone One . I. Ethical Theories and Personal Values A. Identify the ethical theory you would rely upon to address this dilemma, and desc ribe why it would be effective. B. How do you separate personal morals from ethics, and why is this important? C. When is it appropriate to let your morals guide your actions ? Why? II. Duties A. Describe your cou rse of action if you were faced with this dilemma. Why would this reaction be appropriate and effective? B. What is your responsibility as a professional in this scenario? Defend your response. C. Does your ethical responsibility take precedence over your personal views? What do you do if the two are conflicting? D. Identify the impact of society’s changing views of acceptable behavior as it applies to a criminal justice practitioner’s duties. Guidelines for Submission : Your short paper needs to b e 2 –3 pages in length double -spaced, using 12 -point Times New Roman font. Include APA citations as needed. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Ethical Theories and Personal Values: Ethical Theory Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a a nd s upports cl a i ms wi th s chol a rly s ources I denti fi es ethi ca l theory to a ddres s di l emma , a nd des cri bes why i t woul d be effecti ve I denti fi es ethi ca l theory to a ddres s di l emma , but does not des cri be why i t woul d be effecti v e Does not i denti fy ethi ca l theory to a ddres s di l emma 13 Ethical Theories and Personal Values: Personal Morals Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a a nd provi des s peci fi c exa mpl es Determi nes how to s epa ra te pers ona l mora l s from ethi cs , a nd es ta bl i s hes i mporta nce of s epa ra ti on Determi nes how to s epa ra te pers ona l mora l s from ethi cs , but does not es ta bl i s h i mporta nce of s epa ra ti on Does not determi ne how to s epa ra te pers ona l mora l s from ethi cs 13 Ethical Theories and Personal Values: Actions Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a a nd provi des s peci fi c rel eva nt s cena ri os to s upport cl a i ms Determi nes when i t i s a ppropri a te to l et mora l s gui de a cti ons , a nd defends cl a i ms Determi nes when i t i s a ppropri a te to l et mora l s gui de a cti ons , but does not defend cl a i ms Does not determi ne when i t i s a ppropri ate to l et mora l s gui de a cti ons 13 Duties: Course of Action Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a a nd cl a i ms a re wel l qua l i fied Des cri bes cours e of a cti on a nd why rea cti on woul d be a ppropri a te a nd effecti ve Des cri bes cours e of a cti on but does not des cri be why rea cti on woul d be a ppropri a te a nd effecti ve Does not des cri be cours e of a cti on 13 Duties: Responsibility Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a a nd s upports res pons e wi th s peci fi c exa mpl es from s cena ri o Determi nes res pons i bi lity a s a profes s i ona l i n the s cena ri o, a nd defends res pons e Determi nes res pons i bi lity a s a profes s i ona l i n the s cena ri o, but does not defend res pons e Does not determi ne the res pons i bi lity of a profes s i ona l i n the s cena ri o 13 Duties:Precedence Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a a nd s ol uti ons a re rel eva nt a nd pl a us i ble Es ta bl i s hes i f ethi ca l res pons i bi lity ta kes precedence over pers ona l vi ews , a nd how to a ddres s them i f they a re confl i cti ng Es ta bl i s hes i f ethi ca l res pons i bi lity ta kes precedence over pers ona l vi ews , but do es not es ta bl i s h how to a ddres s them i f they a re confl i cti ng Does not es ta bl i s h i f ethi ca l res pons i bi lity ta kes precedence over pers ona l vi ews 13 Duties: Changing Views Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a a nd s upports cl a i ms wi th a rea l -worl d exa mpl e I denti fi es the i mpa ct of s oci ety’s cha ngi ng vi ews of a ccepta bl e beha vi or, a nd a ddres s es how i t a ppl i es to a cri mi na l j ustice pra cti ti oner’s duti es I denti fi es the i mpa ct of s oci ety’s cha ngi ng vi ews of a ccepta bl e beha vi or, but does not a ddres s how i t a ppl i es to a cri mi na l j usti ce pra cti ti oner’s duti es Does not i denti fy the i mpa ct of s oci ety’s cha ngi ng vi ews of a ccepta bl e beha vi or 13 Articulation of Response Submi s s i on i s free of errors rel a ted to ci ta ti ons , gra mma r, s pel l i ng, s ynta x, a nd orga ni za ti on a nd i s pres e nted i n a profes s i ona l a nd ea s y -to- rea d forma t Submi s s i on ha s no ma j or errors rel a ted to ci ta ti ons , gra mma r, s pel l i ng, s ynta x, or orga ni za ti on Submi s s i on ha s ma j or errors rel a ted to ci ta ti ons , gra mma r, s pel l i ng, s ynta x, or orga ni za ti on tha t nega ti vel y i mpa ct r ea da bi l i ty a nd a rti cul a tion of ma i n i dea s Submi s s i on ha s criti cal errors rel a ted to ci ta ti ons , gra mma r, s pel l i ng, s ynta x, or orga ni za ti on tha t prevent unders ta ndi ng of i dea s 9 Earned Total 100%