Change Management Proposal
Week 11 Assignment Rubric CATEGORY | EXCELLENT – above expectations | GOOD – met expectations | FAIR – below expectations | POOR – significantly below expectations or missing | SCORE |
Analysis of the impact of change on an organization. (50 points possible) | The analysis of the impact of change on an organization shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the change taking place, drivers of change, and resistance or conflict to change. (45–50 points) | The analysis of the impact of change on an organization fully addresses the change taking place, drivers of change, and resistance or conflict to change. (40–44 points) | The analysis of the impact of change on an organization lacks depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the change taking place, drivers of change, and resistance or conflict to change. (35–39 points ) | The analysis of the impact of change on an organization is missing (zero points) or poorly addresses the change taking place, drivers of change, and resistance or conflict to change. (0–34 points) |
|
Recommendations for successfully implementing change in an organization. (82 points possible) | The recommendations for successfully implementing change in an organization show depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking by applying change management theories and systems thinking. Recommendations show depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing all assignment requirements including strategies and innovations, the role communication will play, motivation, training and support, sustainability, stakeholder involvement and accountability, and measurement of success. (74–82 points) | The recommendations for successfully implementing change in an organization are fully addressed by applying change management theories and systems thinking. Recommendations fully address all assignment requirements including strategies and innovations, the role communication will play, motivation, training and support, sustainability, stakeholder involvement and accountability, and measurement of success. (66–73 points) | The recommendations for successfully implementing change in an organization lack depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking by applying change management theories and systems thinking. Recommendations lack depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing all assignment requirements including strategies and innovations, the role communication will play, motivation, training and support, sustainability, stakeholder involvement and accountability, and measurement of success. (57–65 points ) | The recommendations for successfully implementing change in an organization are missing (zero points) or poorly address the application of change management theories and systems thinking. Recommendations are missing (zero points) or lack depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing all assignment requirements including strategies and innovations, the role communication will play, motivation, training and support, sustainability, stakeholder involvement and accountability, and measurement of success. (0–56 points) |
|
Writing (32 points possible) | The paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and more than three additional scholarly sources. The paper is 7–10 pages plus a title and a reference page. (29–32 points) | The paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and at least three additional scholarly sources. The paper is 7–10 pages plus a title and a reference page. (26–28 points) | The paper is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and less than three additional scholarly sources. The paper is not 7–10 pages plus a title and a reference page. (23–25 points) | The paper is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting. The work is not supported by the Learning Resources or additional scholarly sources. The paper is not 7–10 pages plus a title and a reference page. (0–22 points) |
|
Instructor comments: | |||||
Total Score (164 possible points): | points |
© 2015 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 2 of 2