Civil engineering assignment literature review
300483 Engineering Project
Student Guidelines
Table of Contents
1. Introduction 3
2. Planning 3
3. Process 3
4. Assessment 3
4.1 Progress Report 4
4.2 Oral Presentation 5
4.3 Final Report 5
5. Guidelines to Report Writing 7
5.1 Fonts and Font Size 7
5.2 Heading and Formatting 7
5.3 Figures and Tables 8
5.4 Making Paragraphs 8
5.5 Units 9
5.6 References 9
Appendix A - Engineering Project Register 11
Appendix B - Engineering Project Team Agreement 13
Appendix C - Meeting and Event Register 16
Appendix D - Sample Title Page 19
Appendix E – Supervisor’s Approval Form 20
Appendix F – Engineering Project Log Book Template 22
Appendix G – Engineering Project Peer Review Report 26
1. IntroductionThis unit includes a capstone project which demonstrates student's professional level of identifying, planning, designing, executing, testing and documenting an engineering project or activity. It is expected that the students select the project in such a way that all the above aspects are covered. However, in some instances it may not be possible to practically carry-out each and every of above activities. In such cases, students must demonstrate the skills and knowledge involved in those activities through writing in the project report.
2. PlanningIt is the student’s responsibility to identify a suitable project. It is recommended that the student can start looking for a project when they have completed 3 years of course work (240CPs). It is useful for students to complete their Industrial Experience before undertaking Engineering Project. Thus, it is desired that students may wish to complete their Industrial Experience unit in 3rd year before undertaking Engineering Project in 4th year.
Some of the organisations that can be contacted for a project are:
City Councils
Consulting Companies
Building and Construction Companies
Manufacturing industries and companies
University’s Capital Works and Facilities Department
State and Federal Departments
Voluntary/ non-profit Organisations
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics
Once the student identifies a project, he/she must form a team of three students at most who are studying in the similar or same level and email a potential supervisor to express interest and seek approval to undertake a project. After the supervisor has approved your expression of interest submit Engineering Project Registration Form and Supervision Agreement Form as well as the Team Agreement Form (see Appendices A, B and C) to the unit coordinator on or before the end of Week 2. Once the approval is granted, the students will work under the guidance of the academic supervisor(s). It is the students’ responsibilities to organise regular meetings with the academic supervisor(s) so that the project progresses consistently in both two half sessions through the whole year.
4. AssessmentThe assessment mainly includes:
Progress report;
Oral Presentation; and
Final Report
The Progress Report includes two parts: a) Group Progress Report; and b) Individual Management Report. Both of them must be completed in Microsoft Word.
The following standards are recommendations for the group progress report, however all aspects of these guidelines are subject to the supervisor's discretion and should be discussed between the student and the supervisor. A team has to submit a group progress report on or before the specified date (check Unit’s Learning Guide for details). The length of the group progress report should be within 50 pages (excluding appendices). The group progress report should contain the following sections:
Cover: 1 page
Executive Summary/Abstract: 1 page
Acknowledgement: 1 page
Introduction: 1 to 3 pages length containing brief background, need for the research, research objectives and outline of the report.
Literature review: 10 to 15 pages length, which should critically examine the previous research or design project under the proposed project and justify the need for the proposed project.
Aim and Objectives: 1-2 pages length
Methodologies and Theoretical background: provide up to 10 to 15 pages of the theory which will be needed to carry forward the engineering project to successful completion.
Preliminary Data Collection/ Analysis: up to 10 pages, students are expected to provide some data and their analysis in their progress report. This will give an indication on the results which may be provided in the final report.
Conclusions or Summary, about 1 page length, which contains the overall conclusion from the report and the likely outcomes expected in the final report.
List of references.
Appendices (include a Gantt chart, which shows the detail timeline of the project completion for both two half sessions and meeting minutes between team members and supervisor(s) and the team during the 1st half session, etc. as well as the other forms).
If more than one student is involved in the project, the Group Progress Report must include the details of the composition of the group with clear indication on the contribution of each member of the group. Past and future contributions from each member of the group must be clearly defined. This information will be used along with the individual peer-review reports to assign individual mark for each student in a group.
Each member in a team needs to submit the Individual Management Report. The contents of the Individual Management Report include the week-by-week based engineering logbook and peer-review report for the first half session. The engineering logbook is a weekly dairy which is used to record your activities every week. The confidential peer-review report must be finished for marking your teammates’ performances on the project during the semester. This report also needs an Assignment Cover Sheet.
4.2 Oral Presentation
While the assessment criteria are given in Unit’s Learning Guide, some of the Oral Presentation Guidelines are listed below:
Presentation should not exceed 20 minutes duration, with 5 minutes allocated for question time.
MS PowerPoint or similar software MUST be used.
Avoid overly complex explanations in the presentation. Try to communicate the most important notions first and then round off with other information.
Use dot points, occasionally indented one level. This reduces what the audience will concentrate on and encourages them to listen to the detail you are speaking.
Do not use slides with detailed schematics. The detail shown will invariably be too small to read and the detailed explanation will detract from the central ideas being conveyed. If schematics are necessary, they should be simplified to illustrate the essential features and with enlarged printing and diagrams. Overheads of a detailed nature should be prepared in anticipation of questions asked by those in the audience who need to examine such detail.
Speak clearly, look around at the audience and project your voice. Do not turn your back to the audience to talk to the projection behind you – use the mouse pointer in a PowerPoint presentation.
The presentation should try to show that the project being proposed is feasible, that the amount of effort needed is not excessive, that the details have been thought through as far as presently possible and the project is "do-able".
Avoid a presentation that talks entirely about generalities. Present specific task oriented information. Treat the presentation as the start of your final project.
On the day of the presentation, each student is expected to be present throughout the entire program.
Just as in the written report, the presentation should include references. It is most unprofessional to use the ideas of others and not to acknowledge them. Please ensure you acknowledge sources of information and cite references.
Begin your presentation with the project title, student name and id number, and supervisor’s name.
Examiners look for: professional appearance, clarity of diction, volume, use of PowerPoint (such as not turning your back to class), the look of the PowerPoint slides (use of dot points, clarity of images – photos, tables or graphs) and technical content. Questions will usually be directed at the technical content and the data analyses sections of the presentation.
The Final Report also includes two parts: a) Group Final Report; and b) Individual Management Report. Both of them must be completed in Microsoft Word.
The following standards are recommendations for the group final report, however all aspects of these guidelines are subject to the supervisor's discretion and should be discussed between the student and the supervisor. The report may vary in length between about 100 to 150 pages excluding appendices. Approximate page counts for each part of the project will be dependent on the nature of the work carried out, but the following can be used as an approximate guide:
Cover: 1 page
Executive Summary/Abstract: 1 page
Acknowledgement: 1 page
Introduction: 1 to 3 pages length containing brief background, need for the research, research objectives and outline of the report.
Literature review: 10-20 pages which should provide critically examine the previous research or design project under the proposed project and justify the need for the proposed project.
Aim and Objectives: 1-2 pages length
Methodologies: 5-15 pages length
Theoretical Background: provide up to 10 to 15 pages of the theory which will be needed to carry forward the engineering project to successful completion.
Data Collection: up to 10 to 20 pages of data collection. Present the data in a concise manner mostly in the form of tables and graphs. Often a page of write up can be replaced by a table or a graph.
Data Analysis and/or design details: up to 30 pages, students should provide a comprehensive analysis of all the data and where necessary provide detailed design details.
Conclusions and Further Work, about 3 to 5 pages length, which contains the overall conclusion from the report and the likely outcomes expected in the final report.
List of references.
Appendices (include an updated Gantt chart, which shows the detail timeline of the project completion for both two half sessions and meeting minutes between team members and supervisor(s) and the team during the 1st half session, etc. as well as the other forms).
If more than one student is involved in the project, the Group Final Report must include the details of the composition of the group with clear indication on the contribution of each member of the group. This information will be used along with the individual peer-review reports to assign individual mark for each student in a group.
Each member in a team also needs to submit the Individual Management Report. The contents of the Individual Management Report still include engineering log book and peer-review report for the second half session. The engineering log book is a weekly dairy which is used to record your activities weekly. The confidential peer-review report must be finished for marking your teammates’ performances on the project during the semester. This report also needs an Assignment Cover Sheet.
For quality control purpose on the final report, it requires a formal approval signed by academic supervisor(s) to grant her/his permission for submission and the form can be found in Appendix F.
5. Guidelines to Report WritingImportant: The formatting is the one that gives an immediate impression about your report to the examiner. If you are after higher grade, you should take the formatting very seriously and follow the standard format, which is normally used for technical writing.
5.1 Fonts and Font SizeUse Arial, 12 font size, 1.5 or double space and 2.0 cm page margin all around. Always print single sided.
5.2 Heading and FormattingChapter heading:
Chapter 1
(First letter capital, bold, centred)
INTRODUCTION
(All capitals, bold, centred)
First Side Heading:
1.1 GENERAL (All capitals, bold, left aligned)
Second Side Heading:
1.1.1 Problem Identification (First letter of every word capital, bold, left aligned)
Third Side heading:
1.1.1.1 Problem statement (First letter of first word capital, bold, left aligned)
Fourth Side Heading:
Risk assessment: The risk... (First letter of first word capital, underline, no numbering, full stop and continue with the sentence)
You should arrange your headings within the above four levels.
In the case of I, II and III side headings leave one line blank on the top and one at the bottom.
Figure headings should be always at the bottom, while the table headings should be at the top. All the figures and tables should be referenced within the text. For example, Table 1.1 shows the data collected…. The Fig. 1.1 shows the experimental setup used in this study…. All the figures and tables should be numbered in the same order as they are referenced. Each tables and figures will have two numbers; first number will represent chapter number. For example, in Table 1.2, the first digit represents that the table in Chapter 1. Horizontally centre the tables and figures.
Samples:
Table 1.2 Sample data for demonstration
| Item | Entry | Exit |
| Joe Harry | 2:30 3:30 | 3:30 4:30 |
Fig. 1.2 Microscope used for the experiments
5.4 Making ParagraphsThe paragraphs should as independent as possible. Don’t assume that the reader have read previous chapters/paragraphs. You should always reference back if you think that the reader should know before understanding a particular sentence or sentences.
5.5 UnitsAlways use SI units. Always use the standard symbols for all the units. Some of the common units and the corresponding standard units are given in Table 2.
Table 2. List of common units and corresponding symbols
| Unit | Symbol | Unit | Symbol | Unit | Symbol |
| Litre Metre Centimetre Millimetre | cm mm | Day Minute Second Hour | min hr | Kilo Gram Million tonne |
Always use Harvard Referencing Style. While quoting citations in the text always use the authors last name and the date of publications. For example: Whitefield (1992); Whitefield and Randall (1992). If the number of authors is more than two then use et al. For example: Whitefield et al. (1992). Also, there are two ways of quoting the citations in the text:
The experimental data presented by Whitefield (1992) depicts drastic deterioration of water quality with respect to time…..
The experimental data presented in the literature (Whitefield, 1992) depicts drastic deterioration of water quality with respect to time…..
You should reference all the material which you have obtained from the literature. Please contact library for a copy of Harvard Style referencing guideline.
Appendix
Various Forms
WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics
Engineering Project Register
(To be submitted to the Unit Coordinator)
Student Numbers and Name(s): ……………………
___________________________________
_____________________________________
Semester/Year :
Major: (Tick Appropriate Box)
COMPUTER ELECTRICAL ROBOTIC & MECHATRONICS
ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL TELECOMMUNICATIONS MECHANICAL CONSTRUCTION
Project Topic:
Topic:
Client: ......................................................................................................... (if applicable)
Any other comments: …………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
Academic Supervisor(s): ………………………….…………
PLEASE SUBMIT APPENDICES A,B AND C FORMS THROUGH ASSESSMENT FOLDER on vUWS
WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics
Engineering Project Team Agreement
(To be submitted to the Unit Coordinator)
Student Numbers and Name(s): ……………………
___________________________________
_____________________________________
Semester/Year :
Major: (Tick Appropriate Box)
COMPUTER ELECTRICAL ROBOTIC & MECHATRONICS
ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL TELECOMMUNICATIONS MECHANICAL CONSTRUCTION
Project Topic:
Topic:
Team Agreements:
The team member should have a meeting to set up the rules on team activities by answering the following questions:
When will we attempt to ‘meet’ for discussion (what time, how often, how will we use chat, bulletin board, email, phone, face to face meetings)?
On average, how long should our meetings be?
When is it OK to miss a meeting or contribute to scheduled online discussions?
How do we inform each other when we can’t be there for a meeting or are running late?
How will we deal with lateness to meetings and for late contributions to online discussion?
What does “on time” mean for each meeting?
What do we do with mobile phone calls & text messaging during meetings?
How do we deal with members who don’t participate enough, participate too much or distract the team from its task?
How are we going to make decisions?
What will we do if a team member’s work doesn’t meet our standards?
Any other agreements you think will be important for effective operation.
___________________________________________________________________
We all understand and agree to the above team agreements.
Team Members:
Student Names: ______________________________________________________
Student Signatures: ____________________________________________________
Date ____/____/____
Witnessed by Principal Supervisor:
Name: __________________________ Signature: _________________________
Date ____/____/____
PLEASE SUBMIT APPENDICES A,B AND C FORMS THROUGH ASSESSMENT FOLDER on vUWS
WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics
300483 Engineering Project
Meeting and Event Register (1st half session)
(To be signed by the student and his/her supervisor at each meeting or completion of an event – omission of this task may result in a Fail Grade)
Progress Meetings:
Regular progress meetings shall be held at least every 2 weeks, lasting about 30 minutes. This form allows for weekly meetings. Student & Supervisor are to agree on dates and insert into the student’s handbook below:-
| Meeting No. | Date | Supervisor Initial | Student Initial |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics
300483 Engineering Project
Meeting and Event Register (2nd half session)
Progress Meetings
Regular progress meetings shall be held at least every 2 weeks, lasting about 30 minutes. This form allows for weekly meetings. Student & Supervisor are to agree on dates and insert into the student’s handbook below:
| Meeting No. | Date | Supervisor Initial | Student Initial |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Automation for the Manufacturing of Hose Assemblies
Tim Gradden
A Capstone Project submitted for partial fulfilment for the degree of
Bachelor of Engineering (Mechanical)
Supervisors
A/Prof Richard Yang (Academic) and Mr David Gradden (Industrial)
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics
Western Sydney University
October 2016
Appendix E – Supervisor’s Approval FormWESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics
300483 Engineering Project
Supervisor’s Approval Form on Final Report Submission
This document is an outline of how the work in the Engineering Project is to be finalised in the 2nd half session. Further details are contained in the 'Unit Outline' and ‘Learning Guide” documents. Students enrolled in 300483 Engineering Project must agree to these conditions.
It is a supervised project to be completed at an approved standard and is to be recognised as such.
The work plan is completed 100% in the project at a time decided by the supervisor with meeting all major milestones planned.
The final report is well written according to the guidelines listed being of letter quality A4, with properly presented diagrams, graphical material and pertinent theory if applicable.
Student Name_________________________ Student Number ______________________
Date:____/____/____ Student Signature ___________________________________
Project Topic:
………………………………………………………….
…..
I have read through the final report drafted by the students in the team and would like to approve the final submission since the report are reaching the quality required according the guidelines.
Principal Academic Supervisor:
Name_____________________________ Signature _________________________
Date ____/____/____
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO:
Reception, School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics
Building XB, Kingswood Campus
Western Sydney University
WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics
300483 Engineering Project
This log book should be typed (in this word file) individually by each student on their weekly performance. At the end of the semester each half session, two hardcopies of this log book as the first part of the individual management report must be submitted accompanying with the group progress/final report to the unit coordinator for marking purpose.
Student Name: _______________________________________________________________
Student ID: __________________________________________________________________
Team Number: _______________________________________________________________
Names of Team Members: _____________________________________________________
Title of Project: _______________________________________________________________
Supervisor(s): ________________________________________________________________
Semester: ______________________; Year: _____________________
Record Period: .……..../ …..…../…….... to .……..../ …..…../……....
| Week | Brief Description of Tasks and Time Spent |
| Week | Brief Description of Tasks in each week and Time Spent |
| 10 |
| Week | Brief Description of Tasks in each week and Time Spent |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 |
Peer Evaluation – Group Project – Evaluation Criteria and Standards
DO NOT submit this page
This template is a modified version based on that developed by Dr Sara Denize, School of Marketing, UWS
| Criterion | Scores for each Standard | ||||
| 0 (UNACCEPTABLE) | 3 (UNSATISFACTORY) | 5 (SATISFACTORY) | 8 (EXPECTED) | 10 (ABOVE EXPECTED) | |
| Quality of Work: Consider the degree to which the individual provides work that is accurate and complete. | Produces unacceptable work, fails to meet minimum group or project requirements. | Occasionally produces work that meets minimum group or project requirements. | Meets minimum group or project requirements. | Regularly produces work that meets minimum requirements and sometimes exceeds project or group requirements. | Produces work that consistently exceeds established group or project requirements. |
| Timeliness of Work: Consider the individual's timeliness of work. | Fails to meet deadlines set by group. | Occasionally misses deadlines set by group. | Regularly meets deadlines set by group. | Consistently meets deadlines set by group and occasionally completes work ahead of schedule. | Consistently completes work ahead of schedule. |
| Task Support: Consider the amount of task support the individual gives to other group members. | Gives no task support to other members. | Sometimes gives task support to other members. | Occasionally provides task support to other group members. | Consistently provides task support to other group members. | Consistently gives more task support than expected. |
| Interaction: Consider how the individual relates and communicates to other group members. | Behaviour is detrimental to group. | Behaviour is inconsistent and occasionally distracts group meetings. | Regularly projects appropriate group behaviour including: listening to others, and allowing his/her ideas to be criticised. | Consistently demonstrates appropriate group behaviour. | Consistently demonstrates exemplary group behaviour. |
| Attendance: Consider the individual's attendance at the group meetings. | Failed to attend the group meetings. | Attended 1%-40% of the group meetings. | Attended 41%-74% of the group meetings. | Attended 75%-99% of the group meetings. | Attended 100% of the group meetings. |
| Responsibility: Consider the ability of the individual to carry out a chosen or assigned task, the degree to which the student can be relied upon to complete a task. | Is unwilling to carry out assigned tasks. | Sometimes carries out assigned tasks but never volunteers to do a task. | Carries out assigned tasks but never volunteers to do a task. | Consistently carries out assigned tasks and occasionally volunteers for other tasks. | Consistently carries out assigned tasks and always volunteers for other tasks. |
| Involvement: Consider the extent to which the individual participates in the exchange of information (does outside research, brings outside knowledge to group). | Fails to participate in group discussions and fails to share relevant material. | Sometimes participates in group discussions and rarely contributes relevant material for the project. | Takes part in group discussions and shares relevant information. | Regularly participates in group discussion and sometimes exceeds expectations. | Consistently exceeds group expectations for participation and consistently contributes relevant material to project. |
| Leadership: Consider how the group member engages in leadership activities. | Does not display leadership skills. | Displays minimal leadership skills in group. | Occasionally assumes leadership role. | Regularly displays good leadership skills. | Consistently demonstrates exemplary leadership skills. |
| Overall Performance Rating: Consider the overall performance of the individual while in the group. | Performance significantly fails to meet group requirements. | Performance fails to meet some group requirements. | Performance meets all group requirements. | Performance meets all group requirements consistently and sometimes exceeds requirements. | Performance consistently exceeds all group requirements. |
Each group member will receive an adjusted project grade based on the average of the evaluations by their peer group members, including your own self-evaluation. It is essential that each group member be very honest in their evaluation of peers’ performance and subsequent score.
NOTE: The unit coordinator reserves the right to review peer evaluations. Overly harsh evaluations and very generous may be revised by the unit coordinator.
300483 Engineering Project – Peer Review Report
(Submit this page as the second part of the Individual Management Report to unit coordinator)
This template based on that developed by Dr Sara Denize, School of Marketing, UWS
| Your Name: |
| |||||||
| Your Student Number: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTING: Each group member will receive the average of the marks awarded by the group.
RESPONSIBILITY: Assigning grades to peers is a serious responsibility as it can have a powerful impact on an individual. Scores should be assigned objectively, honestly and according to each individual's contribution to the group.
NOTE: The unit coordinator reserves the right to review peer evaluations.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Fill out the evaluation form listed below for all of your group members. Make sure to include yourself.
For each of the 9 categories, enter the appropriate score (0 to 10 using the criteria and standards provided on the previous page). A score of 8 indicates that you believe the individual contributed FULLY and as EXPECTED to the group project. Repeat this for each group member. In making your evaluations:
Disregard your general impressions and concentrate on one criterion at a time.
Study carefully the definition given for each criterion and the standards for each level of the criteria.
Call to mind instances that are typical of the individual’s work and behaviour. Do not be influenced by unusual cases that are not typical.
Comments must be used to support your ratings.
List all of the tasks you completed for the project. In other words, what specifically did you contribute to the group effort?
| Student ID | Group Members Names | Quality of work /10 | Timeliness of work /10 | Task support /10 | Interaction /10 | Attendance /10 | Responsibility /10 | Involvement /10 | Leadership /10 | Overall Project /20 | Weighting to be applied to the group project |
|
|
| 0% | |||||||||
|
|
| 0% | |||||||||
|
|
| 0% | |||||||||
|
|
| 0% |
List below the specific tasks you completed for the project:
Comments about the performance of group or individual member: