I need help making a rubric off of my lesson plan. Can anybody help.
STMED 260 Curriculum, Methods, and Assessment Name ________________________________
Unit 3: Assessment Date ________________
Performance Assessment
Objective: Upon completion of this unit, students will be able to design a performance-based assessment that is consistent with the behavioral objectives and the basic principles of measurement (Wisconsin Teacher Standards 8).
Description: A performance assessment is an activity that requires students to “demonstrate performance of certain skills or to create products that meet certain standards of quality” (Stiggins, 2008, p. 155). In this assignment, you will develop a rubric to measure student learning on a performance assessment that measures one of the behavioral objectives in your Learning Activities Plan. The rubric below is a rubric to measure your ability to create a rubric (LOL).
Criteria | Unsatisfactory (1 point) | Emerging (2 points) | Basic (3 points) | Proficient (4 points) | Distinguished (5 points) | Score |
| 1 of the 5 requirements are met. | 2 of the 5 requirements are met with many errors. | 3 of the 5 requirements are met with some errors. | 4 of the 5 requirements are met with few errors. | All of the requirements are met without any errors. | |
| A detailed learning target is NOT provided or is NOT assessed by the rubric. | A vague learning target is provided with many errors and is assessed by the rubric. | A somewhat detailed learning target is provided with some errors and is assessed by the rubric. | A detailed learning target is provided with few errors and is assessed by the rubric. | A very detailed learning target is provided without any errors and is assessed by the rubric. | |
| The learning activity is NOT clearly described. | The learning activity is somewhat clearly described with many errors. | The learning activity is mostly clearly described with some errors. | The learning activity is clearly described with few errors. | The learning activity is clearly described without any errors. | |
| The criteria are NOT clear, observable, measurable, and appropriately sequenced with many errors. | A few of the criteria are clear, observable, measurable, and appropriately sequenced with many errors. | Some of the criteria are clear, observable, measurable, and appropriately sequenced with some errors. | Most of the criteria are clear, observable, measurable, and appropriately sequenced with few errors. | All of the criteria are clear, observable, measurable, and appropriately sequenced without any errors. | |
| The levels of performance are NOT titled, described, and sequenced. | The levels of performance are poorly titled, described, and sequenced with many errors. | The levels of performance are adequately titled, described, and sequenced with some errors. | The levels of performance are titled, described, and sequenced well with a few errors. | The levels of performance are titled, described, and sequenced very well without any errors. | |
TOTAL (25 Points Possible) |
Written Assessment
Objective: Upon completion of this unit, students will be able to design written assessments that are consistent with the behavioral objectives and the basic principles of measurement (Wisconsin Teacher Standards 8).
Description: A traditional written assessment measures student learning on a quiz or test using selected response items (e.g. true and false, multiple choice, or matching questions) and constructed response items (e.g. fill in the blank questions, essay questions, or problems). In this assignment, you will develop a written assessment using multiple question types to measure student learning relative to the behavioral objectives you identified in your Learning Activities Plan.
Criteria | Unsatisfactory (1 point) | Emerging (2 points) | Basic (3 points) | Proficient (4 points) | Distinguished (5 points) | Score |
| 0-1 of the 5 requirements are met. | 2 of the 4 requirements are met with unclear directions or many errors. | 3 of the 5 requirements are met with somewhat clear directions or some errors. | 4 of the 5 requirements are met with mostly clear directions or few errors. | All of the format requirements are met with very clear directions and no errors. | |
| Did NOT include any selected response questions. | Included only one type of selected response question. | Did NOT include the required number of selected response questions or with some errors. | The required number of selected response questions are written with few errors. | The required number of selected response questions are written with no errors. | |
| Did NOT include any constructed response questions. | Included only one type of constructed response question. | Did NOT include the required number of constructed response questions or with some errors. | The required number of constructed response questions are written with few errors. | The required number of constructed response questions are written with no errors. | |
| Did NOT include answer sheets and answer key. | Included answer sheet OR answer key. | Answer sheets AND answer key are provided with correct answers for each question with some errors. | Answer sheets AND answer key are provided with correct answers and points with few errors. | Answer sheets AND answer key are provided with answers, points, and partial credit with no errors. | |
| Did NOT align test questions to the objectives and Bloom’s Taxonomy. | The test questions are aligned to the objectives OR Bloom’s Taxonomy. | The test questions are aligned to the objectives AND Bloom’s Taxonomy with some errors. | The test questions are aligned to the objectives AND Bloom’s Taxonomy with few errors. | The test questions are aligned to the objectives AND Bloom’s Taxonomy with no errors. | |
TOTAL (25 Points Possible) |