Question: Roark rails against the concept of having anyone alter his designs and goes to great lengths to ensure the integrity of his work. Drawing on the readings, the short videos and the feature
Moral and Ethical Foundations of Capitalism: ECO 6340 |
Required texts:
Champions of a Free Society by Edward W. Younkins
http://www.amazon.com/Champions-Free-Society-Capitalisms-Philosophers/dp/0739126482
Capitalism and Commerce by Edward W. Younkins
http://www.amazon.com/Capitalism-Commerce-Conceptual-Foundations-Enterprise/dp/0739103814
Why Businessmen Need Philosophy by Ghate and Ralston
http://www.amazon.com/Why-Businessmen-Need-Philosophy-AtlasShrugged/dp/B0055X61QE
The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism by Hayek
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00KVN64WY/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1
The Fountainhead (movie)
Network – Money Speech http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI5hrcwU7Dk
Greed is Good http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xex9rz_gordon-gekko-greed-is-good-full-spe_shortfilms
Readings: Younkins, Capitalism and Commerce, pp. 1-68; 225-250
Question: Roark rails against the concept of having anyone alter his designs and goes to great lengths to ensure the integrity of his work. Drawing on the readings, the short videos and the feature film, in a 3-5 page essay, provide your answers to the following questions: Why is this? Why can’t he compromise? Should he have compromised? Does he have a compelling moral case for breaking the law by dynamiting the building he designed? (due May 21st)