Review the prompt and source materials provided in the Final Project Guidelines and Rubric document. Then, in a short paper:Describe the different unethical behaviors present throughout the case study

CJ 104 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Prompt: Review the prompt and source materials provided in the Final Project Guidelines and Rubric document . Then, in a short paper: A. Describe the different unethical behaviors presen t throughout the case study. B. Considering the actions of the criminal just ice professionals (e.g., officers and superiors) in the case study, discuss their ethical behaviors in relation to their ethical responsibilities . Did each criminal justice professionals’ decision -making process uphold their et hical responsibilities? Why or w hy not? o Note: when referring to ethical responsibilities , consider how the unethical behaviors you identified in part A relat e to professional standards , such as those found below: i. CALEA Law Enforcement Standards ii. American C orrectional Association (ACA) Code of Ethics iii. American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct Locate at least two additional reputable resources to aid in your final project , and list these resources at the end of your paper, sharing how you anticipate using them to inform your final project. Include citations for these resources in APA format. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: 1–2 pages, double spaced, with 12 -point Times New Roman font. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Description of Unethical Behaviors Meets “Proficient” criteria , and the response is well qualified with identification of “decision points” at which behaviors crossed the line Describe s the unethical behaviors involved , and the response includes supporting examples Describe s the unethical behaviors involved , but the response is not supported with examples Does not d escribe t he unethical behaviors involved 40 Ethical Behavior s in Relation to Ethical Responsibilities Meets “Proficient ” criteria and compares with other real -world examples Discusses the unethical behaviors of the criminal justice professionals in relation to their ethical responsibilities Discusses the unethical behaviors of the criminal justice professionals in relation to their ethical responsibil ities, but discussion is inaccurate or lacks detail Does not discuss the unethical behaviors of the criminal justice professionals in relation to their ethical responsibilities 40 Identification of Additional Resources Meets “Proficient” criteria and resources are from peer - reviewed journals or authors are highly regarded within the field of criminal justice or leadership studies Identifies two additional reputable resources and clearly articulates how the resources will help inform the final proj ect Identifies just one additional resource, the resource(s) are not reputable, or explanation of how the resource will be used is lacking or missing Does not identify additional resources or provide explanation for their use 10 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a profe ssional and easy -to- read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%