In this Discussion, you appraise strategies for obtaining the benefits and overcoming the challenges of implementing and using electronic health records.To prepare· Review the Learning Resources focu

PUP 301 : Final Project Grading Rubric — Realism and Fantasy in SimCity SCREENSHOTS 10 Points Provides the required screenshot for City 1 that clearly inc ludes student ’s name in the city name. 0 Points Does not provide the required screenshot, or does not include the student ’s name in the city name. SCREENSHOTS 20 Points Provides the three required screenshots for City 2 that clearly inc ludes student ’s name in the city name. 14 Points Provides only two of the three required screenshots. 7 Points Provides only one of the three required screenshots. 0 Points Does not provide the required screenshot s, or does not include the student ’s name in the city name. SCREENSHOTS 20 Points Provides the five required screenshots for City 3 that clearly inc ludes student ’s name in the city name. 16 Points Provides only four of the five required screenshots. 12 Points Provides only three of the five required screenshots. 8 Points Provides only one or two of the five required screenshots. 0 Points Does not provide the required screenshot s, or does not include the student ’s name in the city name. FINAL REPORT (PART 1) 40 Points Provides a well -written discussion of 1) the original plans for each city , 2) ways the plans were ( were not) achieved, and 3) difficulties encountered and how these were overcome . 32 Points Provides a discussion of the plans, success es, and difficulties , but with some room for elaboration and/or fails to discuss one of the three . 24 Points Somewhat provides a discussion of the plans, successes, and difficulties , but with definite room for elaboration, and/or fails to discuss two of the three . 16 Points Barely provides a brief discussion of the plans, successes, and difficulties, with e xtensive room for elaboration. 0 Points Does not adequately provide a discussion of the plans, successes, and difficulties. FINAL REPORT (PART 2) 90 Points Provides a well -written critical analysis of how well the game replicates the challenges of planning a city in real life, including 1) how urban issues happen in real ity, 2) how well the game simulates these issues, 3) the responses available (lacking) for decision -ma kers, and 4) the simulated implications of these responses . 72 Points Provides a n analysis of how wel l the game replicates real life planning challenges, but with some room for elaboration and/or fails to discuss one of the four questions posed. 54 Points Somewhat provides an analysis of how well the game replicates real life , but with definite room for elaboration, and/or fails to discuss two of the four questions posed. 36 Points Barely provides a brief analysis of how well the game replicates real life , and/or only discusses one of the four questions posed. Extensive room for elaboration. 0 Points Does not adequately provide an analysis of how well the game replicates real life . EDITING 20 Points No editing errors whatsoever. 16 Points Minimal proofing & editing and/or content revision needed. 12 Points Some proofing & editing and/or content revision needed. 8 Points Substantial proofing & editing and/or content revision needed. 0 Points Proofing and editing errors distracting and in need of sig nificant correction.