Discussion 1"Social Information Technology (IT) and Business Frameworks" Please respond to the following:Consider collaboration as one of the social IT categories in which Facebook, LinkedIn, blogs
Assignment 1: Models for Competitive Dynamics | |||||
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F | Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
1. Compare and contrast the DYB and GYB strategies in terms of the ability to sustain a business in the marketplace over the long term, to be competitive against rivals, and profitability. Weight: 20% | Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the DYB and GYB strategies in terms of the ability to sustain a business in the marketplace over the long term, to be competitive against rivals, and profitability. | Insufficiently compared and contrasted the DYB and GYB strategies in terms of the ability to sustain a business in the marketplace over the long term, to be competitive against rivals, and profitability. | Partially compared and contrasted the DYB and GYB strategies in terms of the ability to sustain a business in the marketplace over the long term, to be competitive against rivals, and profitability. | Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the DYB and GYB strategies in terms of the ability to sustain a business in the marketplace over the long term, to be competitive against rivals, and profitability. | Thoroughly compared and contrasted the DYB and GYB strategies in terms of the ability to sustain a business in the marketplace over the long term, to be competitive against rivals, and profitability. |
2. Examine the “cannibalization” strategy and determine if it is or is not a better strategy compared to the DYB strategy for growth, competitiveness, and market leadership. Provide two business examples. | Did not submit or incompletely examined the “cannibalization” strategy and did not submit or incompletely determined if it is or is not a better strategy compared to the DYB strategy for growth, competitiveness, and market leadership. Did not submit or incompletely provided two business examples. | Insufficiently examined the “cannibalization” strategy and insufficiently determined if it is or is not a better strategy compared to the DYB strategy for growth, competitiveness, and market leadership. Insufficiently provided two business examples. | Partially examined the “cannibalization” strategy and partially determined if it is or is not a better strategy compared to the DYB strategy for growth, competitiveness, and market leadership. Partially provided two business examples. | Satisfactorily examined the “cannibalization” strategy and satisfactorily determined if it is or is not a better strategy compared to the DYB strategy for growth, competitiveness, and market leadership. Satisfactorily provided two business examples. | Thoroughly examined the “cannibalization” strategy and thoroughly determined if it is or is not a better strategy compared to the DYB strategy for growth, competitiveness, and market leadership. Thoroughly provided two business examples. |
3. Determine whether or not changes in business strategy should entail reassessment of IS. Provide three (3) reasons to support your position. Weight: 20% | Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not changes in business strategy should entail reassessment of IS. Did not submit or incompletely provided three reasons to support your position. | Insufficiently determined whether or not changes in business strategy should entail reassessment of IS. Insufficiently provided three reasons to support your position. | Partially determined whether or not changes in business strategy should entail reassessment of IS. Partially provided three reasons to support your position. | Satisfactorily determined whether or not changes in business strategy should entail reassessment of IS. Satisfactorily provided three reasons to support your position. | Thoroughly determined whether or not changes in business strategy should entail reassessment of IS. Thoroughly provided three reasons to support your position. |
4. Examine how firms can use social IT in alignment with organizational strategy and IS strategy. Consider collaborative capabilities; and what, how, and who should use social IT for a social business strategy. Weight: 20% | Did not submit or incompletely examined how firms can use social IT in alignment with organizational strategy and IS strategy. Did not submit or incompletely considered collaborative capabilities; and what, how, and who should use social IT for a social business strategy. | Insufficiently examined how firms can use social IT in alignment with organizational strategy and IS strategy. Insufficiently considered collaborative capabilities; and what, how, and who should use social IT for a social business strategy. | Partially examined how firms can use social IT in alignment with organizational strategy and IS strategy. Partially considered collaborative capabilities; and what, how, and who should use social IT for a social business strategy. | Satisfactorily examined how firms can use social IT in alignment with organizational strategy and IS strategy. Satisfactorily considered collaborative capabilities; and what, how, and who should use social IT for a social business strategy. | Thoroughly examined how firms can use social IT in alignment with organizational strategy and IS strategy. Thoroughly considered collaborative capabilities; and what, how, and who should use social IT for a social business strategy. |
5. 3 references Weight: 5% | No references provided | Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. | Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. | Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. | Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% | More than 8 errors present | 7-8 errors present | 5-6 errors present | 3-4 errors present | 0-2 errors present |