Short Paper/Case Study Analysis Rubric Requirements of submission: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and...
- Short Paper/Case Study Analysis Rubric
Requirements of submission: Short paper assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. Page length requirements: 1-2 pages undergraduate course; 2-4 pages graduate courses.
Failure to adhere to these requirements of submission will result in the paper not being graded.
| Critical Elements | Distinguished (A) | Proficient (B) | Emerging (C) | Not Evident (F) | Instructor Feedback |
| Description of context (15 pts) | Accurately summarizes the context of the prompt using specific detail from the current module and previous learning (14-15) | Accurately summarizes the context of the prompt using specific detail from the module (12-13) | Accurately summarizes the context of the prompt (11) | Does not accurately summarize the context of the prompt (0-10) | |
| Illustration of main elements (15 pts) | Includes all of the main elements and requirements of the prompt and cites multiple examples to illustrate each element (14-15) | Includes all of the main elements and requirements of the prompt and cites at least one example to illustrate each element (12-13) | Includes all of the main elements and requirements of the prompt (11) | Does not include all of the main elements and requirements of the prompt (0-10) | |
| Application of course concepts (20 pts) | Three or more course concept are correctly applied in three or more authentic examples/ scenarios (18-20) | More than one course concept is correctly applied in more than one authentic example/scenario (16-17) | At least one course concept is correctly applied in an authentic example/scenario (15) | Does not correctly apply course concepts in an authentic example/scenario (0-14) | |
| Analysis/ Evaluation (25 pts) | All of the main elements of the prompt are analyzed and evaluated demonstrating a nuanced understanding (23-25) | All of the main elements of the prompt are analyzed or evaluated (20-22) | At least one of the main elements of the prompt is analyzed or evaluated (19) | Does not analyze or evaluate any of the main elements (0-18) | |
| Mechanics (10 pts) | No errors related to organization, grammar, and style (10) | Errors of grammar, organization, and style are marginal and rarely interrupt the flow (8-9) | Errors of grammar, organization, and style are limited enough that the paper is still able to be understood (7.5) | Errors of grammar, organization, and style make the paper difficult to understand (0-7) | |
| Proper Citation (15 pts) | All of the citations are accurately documented in proper format (15) | At least 90% of the citations are accurately documented in proper format (12-14) | At least 75% of the citations are accurately documented in proper format (11) | More than 25% of the citations are not accurately documented in proper format (0-10) | |
| Other Instructor Notes: | TOTAL POINTS EARNED: |
/ 100 possible | |||
