I am looking for someone who can complete my project work the project is on Telecommunications and network security, Here I am attaching the project guidlines and I also need the poer point presentati
Project Evaluation Rubric
Component | Exemplary (3) | Adequate (2) | Inadequate (1) | Score | Max | |
Project overview | Effectively and insightfully develops a set of testable, supportable and impactful study hypotheses. | Develops a set of testable and supportable hypotheses. | Hypotheses are not testable or justifiable. | 10 | ||
Justification for hypotheses | The introduction section provides a cogent overview of conceptual and theoretical issues related to the study hypotheses. Demonstrates outstanding critical thinking. | The introduction section provides a logical overview of conceptual and theoretical issues related to the study hypotheses. Demonstrates competent critical thinking. | Very little support for the conceptual and theoretical relevant to the study hypotheses was provided. Provides little evidence of sound critical thinking. | 10 | ||
Supporting evidence | Provides clearly appropriate evidence to support position | Provides adequate evidence to support position | Provides little or no evidence to support position | 10 | ||
Review of relevant research | Sophisticated integration, synthesis, and critique of literature from related fields. Places work within larger context. | Provides a meaningful summary of the literature. Shows understanding of relevant literature | Provides little or no relevant scholarship. | 10 | ||
Maintains purpose/focus | The project is well organized and has a tight and cohesive focus that is integrated throughout the document | The project has an organizational structure and the focus is clear throughout. | The document lacks focus or contains major drifts in focus | 10 | ||
Methodology
| Identifies appropriate methodologies and research techniques (e.g., justifies the sample, procedures, and measures). Data analytic plan is suitable to test study hypotheses. Provides appropriate justification for controls. Project is feasible | Identifies appropriate methodologies and research techniques but some details are missing or vague. | The methodologies described are either not suited or poorly suited to test hypotheses. The methodology is under-developed and/or is not feasible. | 10 | ||
Grammar, clarity, and organization | The manuscript is well written and ideas are well developed and explained. Sentences and paragraphs are grammatically correct. Uses subheadings appropriately. | The manuscript effectively communicates ideas. The writing is grammatically correct, but some sections lack clarity. | The manuscript is poorly written and confusing. Ideas are not communicated effectively. | 15 | ||
References and citations | Properly and explicitly cited. Reference list matches citations | Properly cited. May have a few instances in which proper citations are missing. | The manuscript lacks proper citations or includes no citations. | 10 | ||
Presentation | The presentation is clear and consistent. The presentation includes motivating questions and advanced organizers | The presentation logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness | The presentation is generally competent. Ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. | 15 |
Overall Total: ______________