Rough Draft Guidelines and Rubric Prompt: Submit a rough draft of your case application paper. Your rough draft should include all of the following aspects of the final submission:·A description of

PSY 634 Milestone Three : Rough Draft Guidelines and Rubric Prompt : Submit a rough draft of your case application paper. Your rough draft should include all of the following aspects of the final submission:  A description of the chosen disorder and a comparison between normal brain function and the brain function of a person with the disorder  An evaluation of the relationship between psychological and physiological aspects of the disorder and the resulting negative effects on daily functioning  An asses sment of the impact of recent technological advancements on the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder  Recommendations for appropriate treatment options and coping mechanisms for the selected case and other people with the disor der  Preventative measures that may be employed for others who may be at risk for the disorder Guidelines for Submission : The rough draft should follow these formatting guidelines: 8–10 pages , double spacing, 12 -point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, and citations in APA format . Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value Description of Disorder Meets “Proficient” criteria and is substantiated through scholarly research (9-10) Provides a description of the child/adolescent’s disorder, including the neurobiology of the disorder (8) The description of the child/adolescent’s disorder is incomplete and lacking in detail (7) Does not provide a description of the child/adolescent’s disorder (0-6) 10 Effects of Disorder Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes insightful examples validated by research (18 -20) Evaluates the effects of the disorder on daily functioning (16 -17 ) The evaluation of the disorder’s effects is lacking in detail and/or accuracy (14-15 ) Does not evaluate the effects of the disorder on daily functioning (0-13 ) 20 Impact of Technological Advancements Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes insightful examples validated by research (18 -20) Assesses the impact of recent technological advancements on the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder (16 -17 ) The assessment lacks breadth and depth in the impact of technological advancements on the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder (14 -15 ) Does not assess the impact of recent technological advancements on the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder (0-13 ) 20 Treatment Options Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes an explicit explanation of the rationale behind the recommended treatment options/coping mechanisms (18 -20) Provides recommendations for treatment options/coping mechanisms for the disorder (16 -17 ) Recommends treatment options that are loosely aligned with the disorder (14 -15 ) Does not provide recommendations for treatment options/coping mechanisms for the disorder (0-13 ) 20 Preventative Measures Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes an explicit explanation of the rationale behind the recommended preventative measures (18 -20) Provides suggestions for preventative measures that may be employed for those at risk for the disorder (16 -17 ) Recommends preventative measures that are loosely aligned with the disorder (14 -15 ) Does not p rovide suggestions for preventative measures (0-13 ) 20 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is prese nted in a professional and easy -to-read format (9-10 ) Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling , or syntax (8) Submission has major errors related to citations, gram mar, spelling , or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (7) Submi ssion has critical errors related t o citations, grammar, spelling , or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas (0-6) 10 Earned Total Comments : 100 %