Assignment 3: The Value of Fair Treatment in the Workplace Due Week 10 and worth 280 pointsThe year is 2025 and the U.S. Supreme Court has declared all laws prohibiting discrimination in the workplace

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.


Points: 280

Assignment 3: The Value of Fair Treatment in the Workplace

Criteria

Unacceptable 
Below 70% F

Fair 
70-79% C

Proficient 
80-89% B

Exemplary 
90-100% A

1. Analyze the benefits and costs of voluntarily prohibiting three to five (3-5) federal forms of discrimination prohibited under the federal anti-discrimination laws.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the benefits and costs of voluntarily prohibiting three to five (3-5) federal forms of discrimination prohibited under the federal anti-discrimination laws.

Partially analyzed the benefits and costs of voluntarily prohibiting three to five (3-5) federal forms of discrimination prohibited under the federal anti-discrimination laws.

Satisfactorily analyzed the benefits and costs of voluntarily prohibiting three to five (3-5) federal forms of discrimination prohibited under the federal anti-discrimination laws.

Thoroughly analyzed the benefits and costs of voluntarily prohibiting three to five (3-5) federal forms of discrimination prohibited under the federal anti-discrimination laws.

2. Discuss the benefits and costs of voluntarily prohibiting a form of discrimination not covered by any of the federal anti-discrimination laws.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed the benefits and costs of voluntarily prohibiting a form of discrimination not covered by any of the federal anti-discrimination laws.

Partially discussed the benefits and costs of voluntarily prohibiting a form of discrimination not covered by any of the federal anti-discrimination laws.

Satisfactorily discussed the benefits and costs of voluntarily prohibiting a form of discrimination not covered by any of the federal anti-discrimination laws.

Thoroughly discussed the benefits and costs of voluntarily prohibiting a form of discrimination not covered by any of the federal anti-discrimination laws.

3. State the benefits and costs of voluntarily adopting hiring and promotion practices designed to diversify the workforce.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely stated the benefits and costs of voluntarily adopting hiring and promotion practices designed to diversify the workforce.

Partially stated the benefits and costs of voluntarily adopting hiring and promotion practices designed to diversify the workforce.

Satisfactorily stated the benefits and costs of voluntarily adopting hiring and promotion practices designed to diversify the workforce.

Thoroughly stated the benefits and costs of voluntarily adopting hiring and promotion practices designed to diversify the workforce.

4. Evaluate the ethical considerations of not voluntarily prohibiting the forms of discrimination laws examined in the first part of your report. Next, determine the ethical considerations of not voluntarily adopting hiring and promotion practices to diversify the workforce.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the ethical considerations of not voluntarily prohibiting the forms of discrimination laws examined in the first part of your report. Did not submit or incompletely determined the ethical considerations of not voluntarily adopting hiring and promotion practices to diversify the workforce.

Partially evaluated the ethical considerations of not voluntarily prohibiting the forms of discrimination laws examined in the first part of your report. Partially determined the ethical considerations of not voluntarily adopting hiring and promotion practices to diversify the workforce.

Satisfactorily evaluated the ethical considerations of not voluntarily prohibiting the forms of discrimination laws examined in the first part of your report. Satisfactorily determined the ethical considerations of not voluntarily adopting hiring and promotion practices to diversify the workforce.

Thoroughly evaluated the ethical considerations of not voluntarily prohibiting the forms of discrimination laws examined in the first part of your report. Thoroughly determined the ethical considerations of not voluntarily adopting hiring and promotion practices to diversify the workforce.

5. Provide a final recommendation to this retailer on whether or not they should ensure all, part, or none of the employee protections examined in the first part of your report. Your recommendation should also include whether or not the retailer should adopt hiring and promotion practices designed to diversify the workplace. Be sure to include a rationale for your recommendation along with an explanation for any rejections of contrary positions or other pertinent considerations.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely provided a final recommendation to this retailer on whether or not they should ensure all, part, or none of the employee protections examined in the first part of your report. Did not submit or incompletely stated whether or not the retailer should adopt hiring and promotion practices designed to diversify the workplace. Did not submit or incompletely included a rationale for your recommendation along with an explanation for any rejections of contrary positions or other pertinent considerations.

Partially provided a final recommendation to this retailer on whether or not they should ensure all, part, or none of the employee protections examined in the first part of your report. Partially stated whether or not the retailer should adopt hiring and promotion practices designed to diversify the workplace. Partially included a rationale for your recommendation along with an explanation for any rejections of contrary positions or other pertinent considerations.

Satisfactorily provided a final recommendation to this retailer on whether or not they should ensure all, part, or none of the employee protections examined in the first part of your report. Satisfactorily stated whether or not the retailer should adopt hiring and promotion practices designed to diversify the workplace. Satisfactorily included a rationale for your recommendation along with an explanation for any rejections of contrary positions or other pertinent considerations.

Thoroughly compared provided a final recommendation to this retailer on whether or not they should ensure all, part, or none of the employee protections examined in the first part of your report. Thoroughly stated whether or not the retailer should adopt hiring and promotion practices designed to diversify the workplace. Thoroughly included a rationale for your recommendation along with an explanation for any rejections of contrary positions or other pertinent considerations.

6. 3 references 
Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present