i have CIB 4103-Business finance i choose Amazon Companyplease see the attached files (Project Guidelines , Sample Project) also the blance sheet and Income statement for Amazon Company

HIGHER COLLEGES OF TECHNOLOGY Computer and Information Science Non -Exam Based Assessment Cover Sheet C o u r s e N a m e B u s i n e s s F i n a n c e C o u r s e C o d e C I B 4 1 03 D a t e T h u r s d a y O c t o b e r 1 8 , 2 01 8 S u b m i s s i o n D a t e O c t 18 th M a x i m u m M a r k s 8 5 m a r k s P e r c e n t a g e o f F i n a l G r a d e . 10% S t u d e n t N a m e C o l l e g e S t u d e n t I D S t u d e n t S e c t i o n This assessment will assess the following Course learning outcomes: CLO1 CLO 2 Question No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14  The entire project /case study /poster is designed and developed by me (and my team members).  The proper citation has been used when I (and my team members) used other sources.  No part of this project has been designed , developed or written for me (and my team members) by a third party .  I have a copy of this project in case the submitted copy is lost or damaged.  None of the music/graphics/animation/video/images used in this project ha ve violated the Copy Right/P ate nt/In tellectual P roperty rights of an individual , company or an Institution.  I have the written permission from people who are featuring in this project.  A Late Penalty of 5% will be given if Not Submitted at the Indicated Time and Date Above ( 18:20 ) Student Signature: Date: For Examiner’s Use Only Question No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Total Marks Allocated 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 85 Marks Obtained Total Marks: Project Guidelines You are working for a selected UAE firm as a financial consultant. The firm asked you to run a financial for the company’ last four financial statements to identify areas of improvements.

You and your team are required to use the ratio a nalysis taken in class and apply it to your company. After the analysis, you and your team are supposed to give the company recommendations on what to do based on your analysis. You can use the following steps to reach your project’s requirement. Step 1 Select One Company from the ones ( 1 – 7 ) given to you by your Instructor. No two Individuals can do the Same Company. Step 2 Develop an excel sheet which consists of years and other variables like Fixed Asset, Current Asset, Current Liability and Incom e Statement. Step 3 Collect all the information and calculate All 14 ratios for Any 3 years. Step 4 Analysis of ratios can be done within the Excel Sheet . Step 5 Email your Answer to your Instructor by 6:20pm Thursday Oct 18 th 201 8. Any submissions after this time will be consider Late and a Penalty of 5% will be given. Project Format: 1. Cover Sheet with the names of all the group members 2. Table of content ( What Ratios are on what sheet ) 3. Excel Sheets with all 14 Ratios and Analysis 4. Ratio interpretations should be in a paragraph format 5. References Marking Rubric Ratio 5 – Excellent 4 – Very Good 3 -2 - Satisfactory 1 -0 - Poor Total Current Ratio Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ra tio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a poor level of financial terminology. Quick Ratio Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some desc riptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a poor level of financial terminology. Total Debt Ratio Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, includi ng moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a poor level of financial terminology. Debt to Equity Ratio Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including po or description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a poor level of financial terminology. Times Interest Earned Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of par ticular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of r atio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a poor level of financial terminology. Price Earnings Ratio Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind t he use of particular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a poor level of financial terminology. Earnings per Share Ratio Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. Exter nal factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct response s are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of partic ular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a poor level of financial terminology. Net Profit Margin Ratio Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. Exter nal factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct response s are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of partic ular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a poor level of financial terminology. Return on Equity Ratio Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct res ponses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a poor level of financial terminology. Return on Assets Ratio Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors a re noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outline d in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a p oor level of financial terminology. Inventory Turnover Ratio Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a po or level of financial terminology. Total Asset Turnover Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct res ponses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a poor level of financial terminology. Days Sales in Inventory Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlin ed in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded u sing a poor level of financial terminology. DuPont System Ratio Ratio analysis is extremely well done, including descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a high level of financial terminology. At least 3 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done properly, including some descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Correct responses are outlined in analysis. External factors are noted and the connection is made using a good level of financial terminology. At least 2 factors are recorded. Ratio analysis is done, including moderate descriptions and reasoning behind the use of particular ratios. Exte rnal factors are noted and the connection is made using a moderate level of financial terminology. At least 1 factor is recorded. Ratio analysis is completed at a low level, including poor description of ratio analysis . 1 factor is recorded using a poor level of financial terminology. TOTAL / 70 Interview: 15 – Excellent 14 to 13 Very Good 12 –to 8 Good < 7 Q 1 Student Answered All question Exceptionality well and thoroughly showing knowledge beyond the discussions in the classroom. At least 3 through examples of outside knowledge/understanding/research was shown in the answers. Student Answered Most of the ques tion very well and has shown some knowledge beyond the discussions in the classroom. At least 2 through examples of outside knowledge/understanding/research was shown in the answers. Student Answered Some of the question well and but has shown little knowl edge beyond the discussions in the classroom. At least 1 through example of outside knowledge/understanding/research was shown in the answers. Student Answered Poorly most of the question and has shown little to no knowledge beyond the discussions in the classroom. No outside or very poor example given from o utside the knowledge/understanding/research was shown in the answers. Q 2 Student Answered All question Exceptionality well and thoroughly showing knowledge be yond the discussions in the classroom. At least 3 through examples of outside knowledge/understanding/research was shown in the answers. Student Answered Most of the question very well and has shown some knowledge beyond the discussions in the classroom. A t least 2 through examples of outside knowledge/understanding/research was shown in the answers. Student Answered Some of the question well and but has shown little knowledge beyond the discussions in the classroom. At least 1 through example of outside kn owledge/understanding/research was shown in the answers. Student Answered Poorly most of the question and has shown little to no knowledge beyond the discussions in the classroom. No outside or very poor example given from o utside the knowledge/understanding/research was shown in the answers. Q 3 Student Answered All question Exceptionality well and thoroughly showing knowledge beyond the discussions in the classroom. At least 3 through examples of outside knowledge/understanding/rese arch was shown in the answers. Student Answered Most of the question very well and has shown some knowledge beyond the discussions in the classroom. At least 2 through examples of outside knowledge/understanding/research was shown in the answers. Student A nswered Some of the question well and but has shown little knowledge beyond the discussions in the classroom. At least 1 through example of outside knowledge/understanding/research was shown in the answers. Student Answered Poorly most of the question and has shown little to no knowledge beyond the discussions in the classroom. No outside or very poor example given from o utside the knowledge/understanding/research was shown in the answers. Total 15 Mks