Hello, I have attached an existing project that was turned in by my friend. I need for someone to re word the paper because I am not able to turn in the same assignment or safe assign will catch th

10/19/2018 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/375/1 162/Week3/W eek 3 Assignment 1 Rubric.html https://blackboard.strayer .edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/375/1 162/Week3/W eek%203%20Assignment%201%20Rubric.html 1/1 Poin ts : 1 80 A ssig nm en t 1 : M ult i- T o uch S cre en s v s. M ouse-D riv e n S cre en s C rit e ria U naccep ta b le B elo w 7 0% F F air 7 0-7 9% C P ro fic ie n t 80-8 9% B E xem pla ry 9 0-1 00% A 1. Dif ferentiate between the interaction types and styles that apply to multi-touch screens and applications running on them.

Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely dif ferentiated between the interaction types and styles that apply to multi-touch screens and applications running on them. Partially differentiated between the interaction types and styles that apply to multi-touch screens and applications running on them. Satisfactorily differentiated between the interaction types and styles that apply to multi-touch screens and applications running on them. Thoroughly differentiated between the interaction types and styles that apply to multi-touch screens and applications running on them. 2. Determine the conceptual model that you would use when designing a product for your restaurant.

Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely determined the conceptual model that you would use when designing a product for your restaurant. Partially determined the conceptual model that you would use when designing a product for your restaurant. Satisfactorily determined the conceptual model that you would use when designing a product for your restaurant. Thoroughly determined the conceptual model that you would use when designing a product for your restaurant. 3. Describe the key analogies and concepts these monitors expose to users, including the task-domain objects users manipulate on the screen.

Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely described the key analogies and concepts these monitors expose to users, including the task-domain objects users manipulate on the screen. Partially described the key analogies and concepts these monitors expose to users, including the task-domain objects users manipulate on the screen. Satisfactorily described the key analogies and concepts these monitors expose to users, including the task-domain objects users manipulate on the screen. Thoroughly described the key analogies and concepts these monitors expose to users, including the task-domain objects users manipulate on the screen. 4. Determine one (1) utility / tool in an application for touch- based and mouse-drive screens that should be designed with memory retention / recall.

Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely determined one (1) utility / tool in an application for touch- based and mouse- drive screens that should be designed with memory retention / recall. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response. Partially determined one (1) utility / tool in an application for touch-based and mouse-drive screens that should be designed with memory retention / recall. Partially provided a rationale for your response. Satisfactorily determined one (1) utility / tool in an application for touch-based and mouse-drive screens that should be designed with memory retention / recall. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response. Thoroughly determined one (1) utility / tool in an application for touch-based and mouse-drive screens that should be designed with memory retention / recall. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response. 5. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note:

Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

You may use the resources above or others of your choosing.

W eight: 10% No references provided. Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 6. Clarity , writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present