Case study with specific instructions and rubric
| TITLE OF RUBRIC: Strategy Case Study | Course: MGT 5170 | |||||||
| LEARNING OUTCOME/S: See attached (CC 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6) | Date: | |||||||
| PURPOSE: Applying theory to practice and consistently using Strategy | Name of Professor | |||||||
| VALIDITY: Strategy Best Practices | Name of Student: | |||||||
| COMPANION DOCUMENTS: Individual Cases | ||||||||
| Earning maximum points in each box in ‘PROFICIENT’ column and / or points in columns to the right of ‘PROFICIENT’ meets standard. | ||||||||
| <<<<<<<<<< less quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . more quality >>>>>>>>>> | ||||||||
| Performance Criteria | Basic | Developing | Proficient | Accomplished | Exemplary | Score | ||
| States Problem Effectively | Does not identify the problem (0 pts) | Identifies a symptom (4 pts) | Identifies a significant problem (6 pts) | Identifies a critical problem (8pts) | Effectively identifies the crucial problem (10pts) | |||
| Analyzes the Situation using Tools and Concepts of Strategic Management | Does not present analysis (0 pts) | Vaguely analyzes material (12 pts) | Generally analyzes the situation (16 pts) | Analyzes some key strategic factors (24 pts) | Insightfully analyzes key strategic factors (30 pts) | |||
| Analyzes Quantitative Factors | Does not present quantitative analysis (0 pts) | Presents irrelevant quantitative analysis (4pts) | Generally analyzes the situation (6 pts) | Analyzes some key quantitative measures (8pts) | Insightfully analyzes key quantitative measures (10pts) | |||
| Generates Realistic Strategic alternative Solutions | Provides no realistic strategic solutions (0 pts) | Provides ambiguous strategic solutions (4 pts) | Provides strategic solutions (6 pts) | Provides realistic strategic solutions (8 pts) | Provides realistic strategic solutions related to the problem (10 pts) | |||
| Evaluates Solutions/ Selects Optimal | Selects without evaluation (0pts) | Selects with little evaluation (8 pts) | Evaluates alternatives and selects one (12 pts) | Evaluates alternatives and explains rationale for selection (16pts) | Evaluates alternatives, provides rationale, and selects optimal Strategic solution for the main problem (20 pts) | |||
| Generates an Implementation Plan | Provides no plan (0pt) | Provides cursory plan (4 pts) | Provides an implementation plan (6 pts) | Provides realistic implementation plan (8pts) | Provides implementation plan considering major factors (10 pts) | |||
| Writes at the Graduate Level | Does not use designated format or standard (0 pt) | Uses designated format, but does not write clearly or in an organized fashion (4 pts) | Uses designated format, style, grammar, punctuation, and references (6 pts) | Uses designated format and writes at the graduate level (8 pts) | Uses designated format and writes at the publishable level (10 pts) | |||
| % | ||||||||
