please help me with the attach files

PEER REVIEW FORM

Answer the questions briefly but specifically – please use a different font or color that makes your comments easily identifiable by the author you are reviewing. When you have finished filling out the form, post it to the discussion thread.

Name of Peer reviewer:

Name of paper author:

Paper title:

5. Strategies of Development.

Is the paper logically organized into separate sections with headings that represent the major and minor points of the argument?

Are the sections of the paper organized into a logical sequence which supports the thesis statement?

What strategies of development do you see the author using on the paragraph level or in the paper as a whole? Which are the most successful?

6. Development of Ideas.

Are the main points of the paper sufficiently developed?

Does the paper bring up any interesting points that you would like to see developed further?

Do you find any spots where the paper goes off on a tangent or addresses peripheral/irrelevant material?

Are there any places where the author relies too heavily on generalization?

7. Organization of the Argument.

Is the argument organized effectively?

Do the ideas follow each other in a logical, understandable way?

Are there any places that are confusing?

Is the argument based upon valid evidence such as peer-reviewed journal articles or opinion?

What strategies of development do you see the author using on the paragraph level? Which are the most successful?

8. Definitions.

Are all the terms well defined based upon an appropriate number of valid sources?

Terms that have generally accepted meanings in everyday language need to have precise definitions when used in scholarly writing. Identify the terms used in the paper that are well defined, and those that need better definitions.