My topic: Gender differences in the autonomic nervous system’s regulation of the heartExample paper: https://learn.liberty.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-27110554-dt-content-rid-328796934_1/courses/BIOM526_39

BIOM 525

Literature Review Grading Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Excellent

Average

Below Average

Unacceptable

Points Earned

Length of Paper and Format

8 to 10 points

  • Each section of the paper is within the required page range, and the total length of the paper is 5–8 pages.

  • Writing correctly follows formatting guidelines.

  • Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are used correctly and appropriately.

  • At least 10 scholarly sources are used in the paper.

5 to 7 points

  • Each section of the paper is the minimum length, and the total length of the paper is exactly 5 pages.

  • Writing generally follows formatting guidelines, but some flaws are detected.

  • Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are used correctly and appropriately with few errors.

  • 6-9 scholarly sources are used in the paper.

3 to 4 points

  • Individual sections are less than the required length and the total length of the paper is 3–5 pages.

  • Writing attempts to follow formatting guidelines, but many flaws are detected.

  • Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are not used correctly.

  • 3–5 scholarly sources are used in the paper.

0 to 2 points

  • Paper is fewer than 3 pages.

  • Writing lacks many elements of correct formatting.

  • Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations and/or references are not provided.

  • Fewer than 3 literature sources are used in the paper.

Principal Content

60 to 70 points

  • The review is relevant to the topic

  • The content and purpose of the paper are clear.

  • Each section of the paper is fully addressed and well supported by course material and scholarly sources.

  • The audience is clear and the level of writing is appropriate for the topic.

40 to 59 points

  • The review is mostly relevant but has some tangents

  • The content and purpose of the paper are mostly clear.

  • Each section of the paper is adequately addressed and sufficiently supported by course material and scholarly sources.

  • The audience is mostly clear and the level of writing is appropriate for the topic.

20 to 39 points

  • The review is only loosely based on the topic

  • The content and purpose of the paper are unclear.

  • Each section of the paper is addressed but insufficiently supported by course material and scholarly sources.

  • The audience is clear and the level of writing is appropriate for the topic.

0 to 19 points

  • The review is only fleetingly related to the topic

  • The content and purpose of the paper are unclear.

  • Each section of the paper is not addressed and/or insufficiently supported by course material and scholarly sources.

  • The audience is unclear and the level of writing is not appropriate.

Organization and Structure

8 to 10 points

  • Paper is excellently composed.

  • Writing is well structured, clear, and easy to follow.

  • Introduction compellingly forecasts the topic and thesis.

  • Each paragraph is unified and has a clear central idea.

  • Transitional wording is present throughout the writing.

  • Conclusion is a logical end to the writing.

5 to 7 points

  • Paper is sufficiently composed.

  • Writing is adequately organized with some difficult-to-follow areas.

  • Introduction is sufficient but needs to provide a stronger gateway into the writing.

  • Some paragraphs lack unity.

  • Better transitions are needed to provide fluency of ideas.

  • Conclusion is present but should provide a stronger end to the writing.

3 to 4 points

  • Paper is poorly composed.

  • Writing is loosely organized with many areas difficult to follow.

  • Introduction is present but does not provide an adequate gateway into the writing.

  • Many paragraphs lack unity.

  • Transitions, when present, are needed to provide fluency of ideas.

  • Conclusion, if present, is trite or barely serves its purpose.

0 to 2 points

  • Organization and structure detract from the writer’s message.

  • Introduction and/or conclusion is incomplete or missing.

  • Paragraphs are not unified (more than 1 topic missing, or inadequate controlling and concluding sentences).

  • Transitions are missing.

Grammar and Diction

8 to 10 points

  • Writing is excellent and appropriate for a graduate-level paper.

  • Writing reflects grammatical, punctuation, and spelling standards.

  • Language is consistently accurate, appropriate, and effective.

  • Writing’s tone is appropriate and highly effective.

5 to 7 points

  • Writing is adequate for a graduate-level paper.

  • Grammatical, punctuation, and spelling standards are observed, although inconsistently.

  • There are some grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.

  • Language is generally accurate and effective.

3 to 4 points

  • The writing contains a moderate amount of grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.

  • Language is unclear, awkward, or inappropriate in parts.

  • The writing’s tone is generally appropriate and moderately effective.

0 to 2 points

  • The writing contains many grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.

  • Language use is largely inaccurate or inappropriate.

  • The writing’s tone is ineffective and/or inappropriate.

Total

Instructor’s Comments:

Page 4 of 4