can some one help me with this exam .i will attach all the notes that you need to answer the questions.

Agreement

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”

“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”

“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master – that’s all.”

Lewis Carroll

I. Teacher to Teacher Dialogue

The concept of mutual assent can sometimes be a rather nebulous ideal for students who want their knowledge handed to them in some sort of lock-step manner. I try to accommodate students by starting with the elements of contract and how these various subcomponents are formulated in the contracting process.

The first element of a contract is finding mutual assent between the contracting parties. Mutual assent is defined as a reciprocal agreement based on a meeting of minds of all of the parties to a contract. The steps leading to mutual assent start with the offer and acceptance process. These steps can be broken down into subparts, and a familiarization of those subparts is essential to the study of contract law.

The offer is broken down into three main subcomponents: intent, certainty, and communication. As an alternate memorization device, students may consider using an anagram called the QQC test. The first Q represents quality of the offer. In the eyes of the offeree, does this offer sincerely represent an objective intent to be bound? The second Q stands for quantity of the offer. If necessary, can a court, looking at this offer, find a basis upon which it could be measured, i.e., is the quantity of the offer readily determinable? The C represents communication. The offer must be communicated to the offeree in order to be effective.

Once a good offer is made, the other player must make his or her opening response. Remember, that response is dictated in many ways by the terms of the offer. Under the traditional common law mirror image rule, the acceptance must reflect the terms of the offer. If it fails to do so, it may be deemed to be a rejection of the offer. And if it brings new terms to the table, it may be deemed a counteroffer. A counteroffer is, in fact, a new offer and sets the whole cycle of play into motion again from the reverse angle. The original offeror is now the new offeree.

Once we have a good offer, coupled with a good acceptance, the first element of a contract, agreement or mutual assent, is arrived at. There are many variations on this basic theme as illustrated by the common law rules on advertising, auctions, and implied contracts based on the actions of the parties. They all have one common denominator: Sooner or later some sort of basis for mutual assent must be found before a court will go forward with enforcement of the agreement.

II. Chapter Objectives

Define agreement, offer, and acceptance.
Describe the required terms of an offer.
Describe special forms of offers, including Internet auctions.
Define counteroffer and describe the effects of counteroffers.
Describe how offers are terminated by acts of the parties and by operation of law.

III. Key Question Checklist

Who has the power to make an offer?
If a statement or promise is made, does it constitute a good offer, using the elements of the QQC test (quality, quantity, communication)?
If the offeree wants to accept the offer, what moves should he or she make?
Is the proposed acceptance valid?

IV. Text Materials

Contracts are voluntary agreements; one party makes an offer and the other accepts, so that there is mutual assent.

Agreement

Agreement is created when an offeror’s offer is accepted by the offeree.

Offer

There are three elements for an offer to be effective: the offeror must have intended to be bound by the offer, the terms must be reasonably certain, and the offer must have been communicated to the offeree.

Objective Intent – The objective theory of contracts asks the question of whether a reasonable person would conclude that the contracting parties intended to be bound by the terms of their agreement.

Express Terms – The terms of a contract must be clear and unambiguous, including the names of the parties, the subject matter and quantity, the consideration, and the time of performance.

Implied Terms – Under common law, if an essential term was omitted from the contract, the courts held that no contract had been made. Under the Restatement, the terms need only be “reasonably certain.” The court can imply missing terms.

Communication of an Offer – An offer must be communicated to the offeree before it can be accepted.

Case 10.1 Contract: Marder v. Lopez

50 F.3d 445, 2006 U.S. App. Lexis 14330 (2006), United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Facts: The movie Flashdance was based on the story of Maureen Marder. Paramount paid $2300 for the rights and Marder signed a full release. The movie grossed over $150 million. Subsequent to this, Sony Music paid Paramount for the release of copyright and produced a Jennifer Lopez song, “I’m Glad,” in which Ms. Lopez sings and dances, recreating scenes from the movie. Marder sued paramount, Sony, and Lopez, asserting rights as co-author of Flashdance and co-owner with Paramount of the copyright. The district court dismissed her claims and she appealed.

Issue: Was the General Release signed by Marder an enforceable contract?

Decision: The U.S. court of appeals held that the release was valid and upheld the dismissal of the actions against the defendants. Although the release language was exceptionally broad, the court held that it was fatal to each of the claims

Ethics Questions: It would seem reasonable that Marder would receive some additional compensation. The adage means that if it is in the contract, the parties will be bound by it. We talk about the agreement being within the “four corners” of the contract – whatever is in the writing, binds the parties.

Special Offers

Advertisements – These are treated as invitations to make an offer, unless they are so definite as to make it apparent that the advertiser had a present intent to bind themselves by the advertisement.

Rewards – An offer to pay a reward is treated as a unilateral contract. In order to be able to collect the reward, the offeree must have knowledge of the offer and have performed the requested act.

Auctions – Sellers can offer goods for sale through an auctioneer. These auctions with reserve are usually considered as an invitation to make an offer. The seller may refuse the highest bid and withdraw the goods, and the bidder may withdraw their bid at any time prior to when the gavel is brought down by the auctioneer. If the highest bid does not meet the minimum set, the seller does not have to sell the item. If the auction is announced as an auction without reserve, the seller is considered the offeror and the bidders, the offeree. The seller must accept the highest bid.

Termination of an Offer by Act of the Parties

Revocation of an Offer by the Offeror – An offer may be revoked at any time prior to its acceptance by the offeree by an express statement or an act that is inconsistent with the offer. The revocation is generally not effective until it has been received by the offeree or their agent.

Rejection of an Offer by the Offeree – An offer is terminated if the offeree rejects it, even against subsequent acceptances by the offeree.

Counteroffer by the Offeree – Counteroffers simultaneously terminate an offeror’s offer and create a new offer.

Case 10.2 Counteroffer: Ehlen v. Melvin

823 N.W.2d 780, 2012 N.D. Lexis 252 (2012), Supreme Court of North Dakota

Facts: In a real estate transaction, a counteroffer was placed on the table but not agreed to by the other party.

Issue: Was a counteroffer accepted?

Decision: No contract exists.

Ethics Questions: No. There would have been a contract.

Business Environment: Option Contract

An option contract is a contract for time.

Termination of an Offer by Operation of Law

Destruction of the Subject Matter – An offer terminates if the subject of the offer is destroyed prior to the acceptance by the offeree.

Death or Incompetency of the Offeror or Offeree – Because capacity is a requirement for a valid contract, death or incompetency will terminate an offer.

Supervening Illegality – Offers terminate if the object of an offer is made illegal prior to the offer’s acceptance.

Lapse of Time – Offers expire. If a specific date is given, they expire on that date; if the offer is for a certain number of days, the days start to run when the offer is received. If no time is stated, then it is for a “reasonable time” period.

Acceptance

The offeree’s assent to the terms of the offer is considered an acceptance.

Who Can Accept an Offer? – Only the offeree can accept an offer and form a legally binding contract.

Unequivocal Acceptance – The mirror image rule establishes that the offeree must accept the terms as stated in the offer.

Mirror Image Rule – To meet this rule, the offeree must accept the terms of the offer without modification.

Critical Legal Thinking – This rule applies to common law contracts but not to sales and lease UCC contracts. The rule is that for acceptance to exist, the offeree must accept the terms as stated in the offer. For common men, it is essential that every aspect to the contract is understood between the parties and thus that agreement is genuine across all of the terms.

Silence as Acceptance – Silence is not an acceptance unless the offeree has indicated that silence means assent, they have signed an agreement indicating acceptance of delivery as in the case of book-of-the-month club, there were prior dealings between the parties indicating that silence means acceptance, or if the offeree takes the benefit of the goods knowing that the offeror expects to be compensated.

Time of Acceptance – Under common law, acceptance occurs when the offeree has been properly dispatched the acceptance. This is called the mailbox rule.

Mode of Acceptance – The acceptance may have to be by express authorization, which means that it is made by a specified means of communications. If there are no specified terms, then implied authorization will be inferred from the customary methods for that type of transaction.

V. Key Terms and Concepts

Acceptance—“A manifestation of assent by the offeree to the terms of the offer in a manner invited or required by the offer as measured by the objective theory of contracts” (Section 50 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts).
Acceptance-upon-dispatch rule—A rule which states that an acceptance is effective when it is dispatched, even if it is lost in transmission.
Advertisement—An invitation to make an offer or an actual offer.
Agreement—The manifestation by two or more persons of the substance of a contract.
Auction—In an auction, the seller offers goods for sale through an auctioneer.
Auction with reserve—An auction in which the seller retains the right to refuse the highest bid and withdraw the goods from sale. Unless expressly stated otherwise, an auction is an auction with reserve.
Auction without reserve—An auction in which the seller expressly gives up his or her right to withdraw the goods from sale and must accept the highest bid.
Authorized means of communication—Generally, an offeree must accept an offer by an authorized means of communication.
Contract—A contract is an agreement that meets certain additional legal criteria and is enforceable in a court of law.
Counteroffer—A response by an offeree that contains terms and conditions different from or in addition to those of the offer. A counteroffer terminates the previous offer.
Equivocal response—An equivocal response by the offeree does not create a contract.
Express authorization—A stipulation in the offer that says the acceptance must be by a specified means of acceptance
Express terms—Most offers and contracts set forth express terms that identify the parties, the subject matter of the contract, the consideration to be paid by the parties, and the time of performance, as well as other terms of the offer and contract.
Implied authorization—Mode of acceptance that is implied from what is customary in similar transactions, usage of trade, or prior dealings between the parties.
Implied term—A term in a contract which can reasonably be supplied by the courts.
Invitation to make an offer—As a general rule, advertisements for the sale of goods, even at specific prices; are generally treated as invitations to make an offer.
Lapse of time—An offer terminates when a stated time period expires; if no time is stated, an offer terminates after a reasonable time.
Mirror image rule—States that in order for there to be an acceptance, the offeree must accept the terms as stated in the offer.
Mutual assent—An agreement requires a “meeting of the minds” of the parties—that is, their mutual assent to perform current or future contractual duties.
Objective theory of contracts—A theory that says the intent to contract is judged by the reasonable person standard and not by the subjective intent of the parties.
Offer—“The manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it” (Section 24 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts).
Offeree—The party to whom an offer to enter into a contract is made.
Offeror—The party who makes an offer to enter into a contract.
Option contract—An offeree can prevent the offeror from revoking his or her offer by paying the offeror compensation to keep the offer open for an agreed-upon period of time. This creates what is called an option contract.
Properly dispatched—An acceptance must be properly addressed, packaged, and posted to fall within the mailbox rule.
Rejection—Express words or conduct by the offeree that rejects an offer. Rejection terminates the offer.
Revocation—Withdrawal of an offer by the offeror terminates the offer.
Reward—An award given for performance of some service or attainment. To collect a reward, the offeree must (1) have knowledge of the reward offer prior to completing the requested act, and (2) perform the requested act.
Supervening illegality—The enactment of a statute or regulation or court decision that makes the object of an offer illegal. This terminates the offer.
Termination of an offer by act of the parties—The termination of an offer by act of the parties consists of situations in which one party takes an action which indicates that he/she is not interested in forming a contract under the terms of the offer.
Termination of an offer by operation of law—An offer can be terminated by operation of law.
Unequivocal acceptance—An offeree’s acceptance must be an unequivocal acceptance. That is, the acceptance must be clear and unambiguous, and it must have only one possible meaning.