QSO: AssignAs you learned in the assigned resources, the five PMBOK® Process Groups (Initiating, Planning, Executing, Monitoring and Controlling, and Closing) are specific processes that help project

QSO 340 Module Two Short Paper Rubric Overview: In this short paper, you will create a general overview of the five PMBOK ® Process Groups and an analysis of how two of th os e process groups apply to the management of the case study for the final project . Additionally, you will identify shortcomings in the project management of the case and make recommendations for improvement. Prompt: Write a short paper based on the five PMBOK ® Process Groups and the case study you selected for the final project. Specifi cally, the following critical elements must be addressed:  Provide a concise overview of each of the five PMBOK ® Process Groups .  Select two process groups and apply them to the case study you selected for your final project. To accomplish this, conduct an analysis of the case study and describe occurrences that are consistent with the components of the two process groups . For instance, the P lanning process group includes creati ng a project scope and schedule: Once you connected those aspects of t he case st udy to the Planning process group, you could briefly discuss how the scope and schedule were created and their main highlights.  Identify areas of weakness and make recommendations for potential improvements. To accomplish this, point out aspects of the two process groups that were not implemented effectively or at all , and propose ways the project manager could address those elements. Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12 -point Times New Roman font, one -inch margins, and sources cited in APA format. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Overview of Process Groups Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides clear, concise, and insightful descriptions Provides an accurate overview of the five process groups Provides an overview of the five process groups , but descriptions are incomplete, inaccurate, or la cking in detail Does not provide an overview of the five process groups 20 Analysis of Process Groups Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides nuanced, detailed analysis Analyzes the role and application of two process groups in the case study Analyzes the role and application of two process groups in the case study, but analysis is superficial, incomplete, or lacking in detail Does not analyze the role and application of two process groups in the case study 40 Recommendations Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides creative, insightful recommendations Recommends potential improvements based on identified project management weaknesses Recommends potential improvements based on identified project management weaknesses, but response is incomplete or superficial Does not recommend potential improvements based on identified project management weaknesses 30 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical e rrors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%