Details:Select a health care organization in your community to conduct an interview with an appropriate risk management employee. The organization can be your current employer, or a different health
Organizational Risk Management Interview
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
Satisfactory
75.00%
Good
85.00%
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Identifies Challenges the Organization Faces in Controlling Infectious Diseases
Not included.
Challenges the organization faces in controlling infectious diseases are somewhat identified, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
Challenges the organization faces in controlling infectious diseases are identified, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
Challenges the organization faces in controlling infectious diseases are identified and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
Challenges the organization faces in controlling infectious diseases are identified comprehensively. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
10.0 %Explains Risk Management Strategies Used in the Infection Control Program With Specific Examples
Not included.
An explanation of risk management strategies used in the infection control program with specific examples is somewhat present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
An explanation of risk management strategies used in the infection control program with specific examples is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
An explanation of risk management strategies used in the infection control program with specific examples is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
An explanation of risk management strategies used in the infection control program with specific examples is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
10.0 %Description of How the Educational Risk Management Program of the Facility Addresses Key Professional Issues (i.e., Prevention of Negligence, Malpractice Litigation, and Vicarious Liability)
Not included.
A description of how the educational risk management program of the facility addresses key professional issues is somewhat present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
A description of how the educational risk management program of the facility addresses key professional issues is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
A description of how the educational risk management program of the facility addresses key professional issues is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
A description of how the educational risk management program of the facility addresses key professional issues is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
10.0 %Explanation of the Policies the Facility Has Implemented That Address Managing Emergency Triage In High-Risk Areas of Health Care Service Delivery
Not included.
An explanation of the policies the facility has implemented that address managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is somewhat present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
An explanation of the policies the facility has implemented that address managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
An explanation of the policies the facility has implemented that address managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
An explanation of the policies the facility has implemented that address managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
10.0 %Description of the Strategies the Facility Utilizes to Monitor and Maintain Its Risk Management Program
Not included.
A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is somewhat present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
10.0 %Brief Assessment of the Risk Management Program of the Organization (i.e., What Works Well, What Could Work Better - The Pros and Cons)
Not included.
Brief assessment of the risk management program of the organization is somewhat present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
Brief assessment of the risk management program of the organization is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
Brief assessment of the risk management program of the organization is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
Brief assessment of the risk management program of the organization is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
10.0 %Inventory of Action Steps Regarding Program Improvement Ideas Inclusive of Rationale
Not included.
An inventory of action steps regarding program improvement ideas inclusive of rationale is somewhat present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
An inventory of action steps regarding program improvement ideas inclusive of rationale is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
An inventory of action steps regarding program improvement ideas inclusive of rationale is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
An inventory of action steps regarding program improvement ideas inclusive of rationale is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
