The Situation: Sabrina Zambreskie is the president of the Workforce Engagement Consortium. The consortium is a collection of local businesses that focuses on improving employee performance and morale
Rubric
Wtg | ||||||
Introduction | Fails to identify purpose and process and lacks direction and focus | Vaguely identifies purpose and process with limited overview of paper | Adequate coverage of topic and brief overview of paper | Effectively introduces topic and provides appropriate overview of paper with direction and focus of key ideas | Provides excellent overview of paper (grabs reader’s attention) Clearly identifies purpose and provides overview of paper with direction and focus of key ideas | /5 |
Body of your paper | Minimal coverage of key ideas with major gaps in support and logic | Adequate coverage of key ideas with major gaps in logic and coverage | Evidence of analysis of key ideas with minor gaps in logic and coverage | Main ideas and factors are clearly identified and developed with key ideas supported with logic and adequate coverage. | Effectively identifies and analyzes key factors. Provides in-depth and comprehensive coverage of all areas. Ideas are developed and supported with detail to achieve the intended purpose of the communication. Demonstrates ability to synthesize ideas. | /10 |
Conclusion | Vague consolidation of facts and information Lack of logic | Evidence of consolidation of facts and information Conclusion lacks support in body | Acceptable consolidation of facts and information Logical and well supported conclusion | Good consolidation of facts and information Logical and well supported conclusion | Excellent consolidation of facts and information Logical and well supported conclusion | /5 |
Research Documentation Support (Reference to course learning) | Ineffective incorporation of information and evidence of research and consolidation Minor errors in sourcing and documentation | Acceptable incorporation of information and evidence of research and consolidation Minor errors in sourcing and documentation | Acceptable incorporation of information and evidence of research and consolidation of ideas properly sourced and documented. | Good incorporation of information and evidence of research and consolidation of ideas properly sourced and documented. | Excellent incorporation of information and evidence of research and consolidation of ideas properly sourced and documented. |
/10 |
Logic and Flow of Information | No consolidation and flow of ideas. No use of transitions and consolidations | Limited consolidation and flow of ideas. Minimal use of transitions and consolidations | Adequate consolidation and flow of ideas. Average use of transitions and consolidations | Effective consolidation and flow of ideas. Good use of transitions and consolidations | Information flows logically and excellent use of transitions and consolidations. Clearly, concisely, and logically written – well suited for the topic and intended audience. | /10 |
Syntax, Grammar, Punctuation and Spelling | Major errors in punctuation, syntax, grammar and/or spelling which makes it difficult to read. Includes more than 5 spelling/ grammar errors. | Major errors in punctuation, syntax, grammar and/or spelling which interrupts the flow for the reader. Includes 4 – 5 spelling/ grammar errors | Minor errors in punctuation, syntax, grammar and/or spelling which do not break the flow for the reader. Includes 3 – 4 spelling/ grammar errors | No spelling/ grammar errors. There are 1 – 2 minor syntax or punctuation errors. | There are no grammatical, syntax, spelling or punctuation errors. Excellent use of vocabulary to articulate ideas. | /10 |
Total | /50 |