Final Project Milestone 3: Intervention Strategy and Implementation Plan Draft For Milestone Three, building upon your work for Milestone Two, you will submit a draft of the intervention strategy and

PSY 638 Final Project Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric Prompt: Building upon your work for Milestone s One and Two, you will submit a draft of the Intervention Strategy and Implementation Plan sections of your grant proposal. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed in your milestone assignment : III. Intervention Strategy : Research and justify the selection of a theoretically supported and effective intervention strategy for addressing the targ et issue. a. Efficacy : Analyze and c ritique at least two established intervention strategies for inconsistencies and effectiveness. i. Critically examine intervention strategies for consistency with c urrent developmental theories. ii. How effective were these strategies in addressing their respective issues? To what extent would these intervention strategies address the issue identified in your community? b. Selection : Select an intervention strategy and justify your selection based on its effectiveness and the individual, familial, environmen tal, cultural, and political factors. Your strategy should be appropriate for your age -specific population. c. Ethics : Analyze the selected intervention strategy for possible ethical and legal challenges. Consider provider as well as client c oncerns. IV. Implementation Plan : Construct a plan for implementation of the selected intervention strategy in your community. a. Narrative : Compose a narrative to describe the setting, personnel, target population, length of time for service, and cap acity of the proposed program. b. Training : Formulate a strategy for the training of personnel according to the s elected intervention strategy. c. Assessment : Recommend an assessment plan to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention strategy. d. Ethics : Assess the ethical and le gal implications for implementing the interventi on strategy in your community. Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 6–8 page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12 -point Times New Roman font, one - inch margins, and at leas t five sources cited in APA format. Rubric Critical Elements Proficient (100 %) Needs Improvement (75% ) Not Evident (0% ) Value Intervention Strategy: Efficacy Submission evidences an extensive review of the current literature to demonstrate consideration of evidence - based intervention strategies for the identified problem/need (considers a minimum of two intervention strategies at a highly detailed level) Submission evidences a basic review of the current literature to demonstrate consideration of evidence -based intervention strategies for the identified problem/need; submission may consider only a single intervention strategy Submission evidences a selective or minimal review of the current literature to demonstrate consideration of evidence -based intervention strategies for the identified problem/need, and the submission considers only a single intervention strategy 13 Intervention Stra tegy: Selection Submission evidences a clear selection of an intervention strategy based on theoretical and research support considering the age -specific population and community Submission evidences a clear selection of an intervention strategy that may lack a clear basis in theoretical and research support or it may not clearly consider the age -specific population and community Submission evidences a selection of an intervention strategy that lacks a clear basis in theoretical and research support, and i t fails to clearly consider the age -specific population and community 13 Intervention Strategy: Ethics Submission provides an extensive review of the ethical and legal implications for using the selected intervention strategy that considers provider as well as client concerns Submission provides a review of the ethical and legal implications for using the selected intervention strategy that may only consider either provider or client concerns Submission provides a selective or minimal review of the ethi cal and legal implications for using the selected intervention strategy, and it only considers either provider or client concerns 13 Implementation Plan: Narrative Submission presents a detailed narrative to sufficiently describe the setting, personnel, target population, length of time for service, and capacity of the proposed program Submission presents a narrative that may lack detail to sufficiently describe one or more of the following key components: the setting, personnel, target population, length of time for service, and capacity of the proposed program Submission presents a narrative that lacks detail to sufficiently describe two or more of the following key components: the setting, personnel, target population, length of time for service, and capacity of the proposed program 13 Implementation Plan: Training Submission presents a detailed plan that accounts for the training needs of the essential personnel who will supply the services outlined in the intervention strategy Submission presents a plan that accounts for key training needs of the essential personnel who will supply the services outlined in the intervention strategy; this plan may lack the level of detail necessary to demonstrate full consideration of training needs Submission lacks a plan that accounts for the training needs of the essential personnel who will supply the services outlined in the intervention strategy, or the plan as presented is minimal for meeting training needs for the selected intervention 13 Imp lementation Plan: Assessment Submission provides a detailed plan for assessing the effectiveness of the program/intervention strategy (an essential component of grant submission that allows for programs to be considered “evidence based”) Submission provides a general concept for assessing the effectiveness of the program/intervention strategy, yet it may lack clear direction or statistical concepts to meet the goal of the data collection Submission provides a concept too general for assessing the eff ectiveness of the program/intervention strategy 13 Implementation Plan: Ethics Submission evidences a strong assessment of the ethical and legal considerations for implementing the intervention strategy Submission evidences an assessment of the ethical and legal considerations for implementing the intervention strategy; this may lack attention to one or more elements necessary for a sound ethical approach Submission provides minimal consideration of the ethical and legal implications; this submis sion lacks attention to two or more essential elements necessary for a sound ethical approach 13 Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has some errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understa nding of ideas 9 Earned Total 100%