InstructionsSubmit your final scenario analysis. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedbac

JUS261FinalProjectGuidelinesandRubricOverviewThefinalprojectforthiscourseisthecreationofascenarioanalysis.Federal,state,andlocaljudicialsystemseachhaveuniqueprocessesandrequireadministrationtoeffectivelymovecasesthroughthesystems.Playersfromeachsysteminteractintheadministrationofjustice;therefore,itisimportanttounderstandhowthesystemsworkandengagewitheachotherforefficientjudicialadministration.Understandinghowjudicialsystemsworkiskeyforanyonelookingtopursueacareerwithinthecourts.Inthisassessment,youwillexamineandevaluatetherolesandprocessesofthesystems,regardlessofyourpositionwithinthesystems.Throughanalyzingascenario,youwilldeterminepropervenue,jurisdiction,andlitigationprocess,aswellasmakeadministrativedecisions.Youwillalsoassumemultipleperspectivesinordertodetermineefficientandeffectivewaystomoveacasethroughthejudicialprocess.Theprojectisdividedintotwomilestones,whichwillbesubmittedatvariouspointsthroughoutthecoursetoscaffoldlearningandensurequalityfinalsubmissions.ThesemilestoneswillbesubmittedinModulesThreeandFive.ThefinalproductwillbesubmittedinModuleSeven.Inthisassignment,youwilldemonstrateyourmasteryofthefollowingcourseoutcomes:AnalyzevenueandjurisdictionfortheirimplicationstodifferentlevelsofgovernmentIllustratethevariousrolesplayedinthejudicialsystemforinformingthedevelopmentofeffectiveadministrationstrategiesAssessthefunctionofcalendarsanddocketsinthelegalsystemforcreatingefficiencyEvaluatethecivilandcriminallitigationprocessesatdifferentlevelsofgovernmentfortheirabilitytoefficientlycarryoutjusticePromptInthisassessment,youwillanalyzeandevaluatethefollowingscenariofromtheperspectivesofanattorneyandajudge.Youwilladdresshowthisscenariowouldbehandledbythejudicialsystemsbycreatingascenarioanalysis.Basedonthescenario,examinehowitwouldbetriedwithinthejudicialsystems.ScenarioJed,Herman,andJaneliveinWashington,D.C.JedandJaneenteredthelocalbankandtook$65,000.JedandHermanbothusedshotgunsduringtherobbery,thoughnoonewashurt.Janedrovethegetawayvehicle.Twohourslater,astheyheadedtowardtheCanadianborder,theywerestoppedbythepoliceforspeedingandtakenintocustody.ThepolicedeterminedthatJedandJanematchedtheeyewitnessdescriptionsoftherobbers.Janeconfessedtheirbankrobberyscheme.JedandHermandeniedtheirinvolvement.Thepoliceonlyrecovered$25,000incash,butwereunabletodetermineiftherecoveredmoneywastakenfromthebank.ThepolicedeterminedthatJedwasaconvictedfelonatthetimeofthearmedbankrobbery.ThelocalpoliceandFBIwereinvolvedintheinvestigation. Thedefenseattorneysforeachdefendant(Jed,Herman,Jane)requestacontinuanceforfourmonthstosiftthroughtheevidence.Theprosecutionobjectsandarguesthatthedelaywouldsignificantlyclogthecourt’salreadyheavyworkload.Inthealternative,theprosecutionarguesthatifthecourtgrantsacontinuance,thentheprosecutionshouldbeallowedtoprolongturningovertheremainingdiscovery.Thedefenseattorneysobjectandarguethatthishinderstheireffectiverepresentationoftheirclientsandwouldhinderapromptresolution.Thedefenseattorneysfurtherarguethattheirclientsdeserveawellpreparedandthoroughdefense.Thejudgecurrentlyhastrialsblockedoverthenext10monthsandwantstotrythecasenow.Specifically,thefollowingcriticalelementsmustbeaddressed:I.JudicialSystemsA.Describethehierarchicalstructureforfederal,state,andlocalcourtsystems.Whatistheprimaryroleofeachlevel?B.Explaintheprimarydifferencesbetweenthefederalandstatelevelsofjudicialsystems.Describetheimportanceinhavingthesedifferentlevels.C.Explainthesubjectmatterjurisdictionforfederal,state,andlocalcourts.Whatimpactdoesthishaveontheefficiencyofcourtsystems?D.Distinguishwhichcourt(s)wouldhavejurisdictioninthisscenario?Defendyourresponse.E.Determinehowvenueisdecidedupon.Whataretheimplicationsofvenue?F.Whatwouldthevenuebeforthisscenario?Defendwhythisvenueisthemostappropriate.G.Explaintheapplicablesentencingguidelinesinthefederalandstatejudicialsystemsforthisscenario.Defendyourresponse.H.Determinehowsentencingguidelinesimpactthefunctionalityofacourtsystem.Defendyourresponse.II.JudicialAdministrationA.Analyzehowfederal,state,andlocalcourtscalendaranddocketcases.Aretheseprocesseseffectiveinpromotingefficiency?Defendyourresponse.B.Describehowthecalendaringandcontinuanceofthisscenariowouldbehandleddifferentlyinthestatesystemversusthefederalsystem.Defendyourresponse.C.Identifythekeyrolewithinfederalandstatejudicialsystemsthatmostimpactsprocess.Howdoesthisroleaidincreatingandmaintaininganefficientandeffectivejudicialprocess?D.Describethelitigationprocessthatwouldbeusedforthisscenarioatthestateandfederallevels.E.Explainthestatuteoflimitationsonchargingandtryingcases.Determinehowstatuteoflimitationscouldimpactefficiencyinthelitigationprocessofthiscase.F.Determinetheimpactofvenueonprocessefficiencyinthisscenario.Defendyourresponse.G.Explainhowafour-monthcontinuanceaffectstheefficiencyofanycourtunderthecircumstancespresentedinthescenario.Defendyourresponse.H.Howwouldyoubalancetheprosecutoranddefenseattorneys’concernsregardingcontinuancesinthisscenario?Defendyourresponse.I.Reviewthediscoverylawsinfederalcourt.Determineiftheprosecution’srequesteddiscoverydelayviolatesthefederallaws.Defendyourresponse.J.Wouldyougranttheprosecution’srequest(assumingthatyougrantedthefour-monthcontinuance)?Defendyourresponse. MilestonesMilestoneOne:DraftofJudicialSystemsInModuleThree,youwillsubmitadraftoftheJudicialSystemssectionofyourscenarioanalysis.Usingyourassignedreadingandcoursematerials,youwillanalyzethestructureofthecourtsandtheapplicationofprinciplesofjurisdictionandvenuetothescenarioprovided.Yourdraftshouldbetwotothreepagesinlength.ThismilestoneisgradedwiththeMilestoneOneRubric.MilestoneTwo:DraftofJudicialAdministrationInModuleFive,youwillsubmitadraftoftheJudicialAdministrationsectionofyourscenarioanalysis.Usingyourassignedreadingandcoursematerials,youwillanalyzetheimpactofjudicialadministrationcomponents—calendaringanddocketing,andtherolesofcourtstaffandlitigationparticipants.Yourdraftshouldbetwotothreepagesinlength.ThismilestoneisgradedwiththeMilestoneTwoRubric.FinalSubmission:ScenarioAnalysisInModuleSeven,youwillsubmityourscenarioanalysis.Itshouldbeacomplete,polisheddocumentcontainingallofthecriticalelementsofthefinalproduct.Itshouldreflecttheincorporationoffeedbackgainedthroughoutthecourse,aswellasincludetheitemsthatwereomittedfromyouranalysesinMilestoneOneandMilestoneTwo.ThefinalsubmissionwillbegradedusingtheFinalProjectRubric.FinalProjectRubricGuidelinesforSubmission:Yourscenarioanalysismustbefourtosixpagesinlengthwithdoublespacing,12-pointTimesNewRomanfont,andAPAformatting.CriticalElementsExemplary(100%)Proficient(85%)NeedsImprovement(55%)NotEvident(0%)ValueJudicialSystems:HierarchicalStructureMeets“Proficient”criteriaanddescriptionisexceptionallyclearandcontextualizedDescribesthehierarchicalstructureforfederal,state,andlocalcourtsystems,andestablishestheprimaryroleofeachDescribesthehierarchicalstructureforfederal,state,andlocalcourtsystems,butdoesnotestablishtheprimaryroleofeachDoesnotdescribethehierarchicalstructureforfederal,state,andlocalcourtsystems5.3JudicialSystems:LevelMeets“Proficient”criteriaandexplanationisexceptionallyclearandcontextualizedExplainstheprimarydifferencesbetweenfederalandstatejudicialsystemsanddescribestheimportanceofhavinglevelsExplainstheprimarydifferencesbetweenfederalandstatejudicialsystems,butdoesnotdescribetheimportanceofhavinglevelsDoesnotexplainthedifferencesbetweenlevelsofjudicialsystems5.3JudicialSystems:SubjectMatterJurisdictionMeets“Proficient”criteriaandsupportsclaimswithconcreteexamplesExplainsthesubjectmatterjurisdictionforfederal,state,andlocalcourts,andstatesitsimpactoncourtefficiencyExplainsthesubjectmatterjurisdictionforfederal,state,andlocalcourts,butdoesnotaddresstheimpactofsubjectmatterjurisdictiononefficiencyDoesnotexplainsubjectmatterjurisdictionforcourts5.3 JudicialSystems:JurisdictionMeets“Proficient”criteriaandresponsecontainsconcreteevidenceDistinguisheswhichcourtwouldhavejurisdictionanddefendsresponseDistinguisheswhichcourtwouldhavejurisdiction,butdoesnotdefendresponseDoesnotdistinguishwhichcourtwouldhavejurisdiction5.3JudicialSystems:DetermineVenueMeets“Proficient”criteriaandsubstantiatesclaimswithspecificinstancesDetermineshowvenueisestablished,anddescribestheimplicationsofvenueDetermineshowvenueisestablished,butdoesnotdescribetheimplicationsofvenueDoesnotdeterminehowvenueisestablished5.3JudicialSystems:VenueMeets“Proficient”criteriaandsubstantiatesclaimswithspecificinstancesIdentifiesvenueforscenario,anddefendswhyvenueismostappropriateIdentifiesvenueforscenario,butdoesnotdefendwhyvenueismostappropriateDoesnotidentifyvenueforscenario5.3JudicialSystems:SentencingGuidelinesMeets“Proficient”criteriaanddrawsconnectionstoreal-worldprocessesExplainssentencingguidelinesinthefederalandstatejudicialsystems,anddescribestheirimpactonfunctionalityExplainssentencingguidelinesinthefederalandstatejudicialsystems,butdoesnotdescribetheirimpactonfunctionalityDoesnotexplainsentencingguidelines5.3JudicialSystems:FunctionalityMeets“Proficient”criteriaanddrawsconnectionstoreal-worldprocessesDetermineshowsentencingguidelinesimpactthefunctionalityofacourtsystem,anddefendsresponseDetermineshowsentencingguidelinesimpactthefunctionalityofacourtsystem,butdoesnotdefendresponseDoesnotdeterminehowsentencingguidelinesimpactthefunctionalityofacourtsystem5.3JudicialAdministration:CalendarandDocketMeets“Proficient”criteriaandsupportsclaimswithspecificexamplesfromthecalendaranddocketprocessesAnalyzeshowfederal,state,andlocalcourtscalendaranddocketcasesandestablishestheirimpactonefficiencyAnalyzeshowfederal,state,andlocalcourtscalendaranddocketcasesbutdoesnotestablishtheirimpactonefficiencyDoesnotanalyzehowcourtscalendaranddocketcases5.3JudicialAdministration:CalendaringMeets“Proficient”criteriaandshowsnuancedunderstandingofdifferencesbetweenthestateandfederaljudicialsystemsDescribeshowthecalendaringandcontinuanceofthiscasewouldbehandledinthestateandfederaljudicialsystemsanddefendsresponseDescribeshowthecalendaringandcontinuanceofthiscasewouldbehandledinthestateorfederaljudicialsystems,butdoesnotdefendresponseorresponseislackingdetailorinaccurateDoesnotdescribehowthecalendaringofthiscasewouldbehandledinthestateorfederaljudicialsystems5.3JudicialAdministration:KeyRoleMeets“Proficient”criteriaandconnectsrolewithspecificexamplesfromprocessesIdentifieskeyrolewithinfederalandstatejudicialsystems,andestablisheshoweachaidsinmaintaininganefficientandeffectivejudicialsystemIdentifieskeyrolewithinfederalandstatejudicialsystems,butdoesnotestablishhoweachaidsinmaintaininganefficientandeffectivejudicialsystemDoesnotidentifykeyrolewithinfederalandstatejudicialsystems5.3JudicialAdministration:LitigationProcessDescriptionMeets“Proficient”criteriaanddescriptionisconciseandcontextualizedDescribesthelitigationprocessatthestateandfederallevelDescribesthelitigationprocessatthestateorfederallevel,butnotbothDoesnotdescribethelitigationprocess5.3 JudicialAdministration:StatuteofLimitationsMeets“Proficient”criteriaandiswellqualifiedwithexamplesExplainsthestatuteoflimitationsonchargingandtryingcases,anddeterminestheirimpactonefficiencyExplainsthestatuteoflimitationsonchargingandtryingcases,butdoesnotaddresstheirimpactonefficiencyDoesnotexplainthestatuteoflimitationsonchargingandtryingcases5.3JudicialAdministration:ImpactofVenueMeets“Proficient”criteriaandsubstantiatesclaimswithspecificinstancesDeterminestheimpactofvenueonprocessefficiencyinthisscenarioanddefendsresponseDeterminestheimpactofvenueonprocessefficiencyinthisscenario,butdoesnotdefendresponseDoesnotdeterminetheimpactofvenueonprocessefficiency5.3JudicialAdministration:ContinuanceMeets“Proficient”criteriaandqualifiesconnectionswithreal-worldexamplesIdentifiestheeffectsofacontinuanceonacourt,explainstheimpactonacourt’sefficiency,anddefendsresponseIdentifiestheeffectsofacontinuanceonacourtbutdoesnotexplaintheimpactonacourt’sefficiencyordoesnotdefendresponseDoesnotidentifytheeffectsofacontinuanceonacourt5.3JudicialAdministration:ConcernsMeets“Proficient”criteriaandsolutioniswellsupportedandlogicalDetermineshowtobalanceattorneyconcerns,explainswhychosenstrategywouldbeeffective,anddefendsresponseDetermineshowtobalanceattorneyconcernsbutdoesnotexplainwhychosenstrategywouldbeeffectiveordoesnotdefendresponseDoesnotdeterminehowtobalanceconcerns5.3JudicialAdministration:DiscoveryDelayMeets“Proficient”criteriaanddefenseiswellqualifiedwithspecificexamplesDeterminesiftheprosecution’srequesteddiscoverydelayviolatesfederallawsanddefendsresponseDeterminesiftheprosecution’srequesteddiscoverydelayviolatesfederallawsbutdoesnotdefendresponseDoesnotdetermineiftheprosecution’srequesteddiscoverydelayviolatesfederallaws5.3JudicialAdministration:ProsecutionRequestMeets“Proficient”criteriaanddeterminationiswellsupportedandlogicalDeterminesifprosecution’srequestshouldbegrantedanddefendsresponseDeterminesifprosecution’srequestshouldbegranted,butdoesnotdefendresponseDoesnotdetermineifprosecution’srequestshouldbegranted5.3ArticulationofResponseSubmissionisfreeoferrorsrelatedtocitations,grammar,spelling,syntax,andorganizationandispresentedinaprofessionalandeasy-to-readformatSubmissionhasnomajorerrorsrelatedtocitations,grammar,spelling,syntax,ororganizationSubmissionhasmajorerrorsrelatedtocitations,grammar,spelling,syntax,ororganizationthatnegativelyimpactreadabilityandarticulationofmainideasSubmissionhascriticalerrorsrelatedtocitations,grammar,spelling,syntax,ororganizationthatpreventunderstandingofideas4.6EarnedTotal100%