Topic: InfoSec Policy EnforcementPrompt: After reviewing the material in the Reading & Study folder for this module/week, address the following, integrating biblical perspectives where appropriate:Con

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Thread (19 pts.)

Student effectively answers the questions with supporting material from the week’s reading with thoughtful analysis. Christian worldview integration found, supported by scripture.

19 to 17 points*

Student’s post effectively answers both questions in the discussion board by thoroughly analyzing material presented by the course readings (internal sources) as well as other academically approved sources (external). Post shows a thorough interaction with material in a thought-provoking manner to encourage class interaction.

16 points*

Student’s post effectively answers the key points of both questions in the discussion board. Post reveals interaction with course readings (internal) sources or other academically approved (external) sources. Post shows proficient interaction with material in logical manner so as to encourage class interaction.

15 to 1 points*

Student’s post answers all or most of the key points of both questions in the discussion board. Post reveals interaction with some course (internal) sources or other (external) sources. Post shows moderate interaction with material in logical manner which may or may not promote class interaction.

0 points

No post was made for this thread.

Reply 1 (8 pts)

Student commentary adds value to the ongoing conversation, supports thoughts with academic material. Christian worldview integration found, supported by scripture.

8 points*

Student’s reply adds notable depth to the ongoing conversation and encourages collaborative discussion among peers in a thought-provoking way. Student supports their thoughts with both course readings (internal sources) and other academically approved sources (external). Biblical integration found.

7 points*

Student’s reply adds some depth to the ongoing conversation and encourages collaborative discussion among peers in a proficient way. Student supports their thoughts with either course readings (internal sources) or other academically approved sources (external). Biblical integration found.

6 to 1 points*

Student’s reply adds minimal depth to the ongoing conversation among peers in a thought-provoking way. Student supports their thoughts with either course readings (internal sources) or other sources (external). Biblical integration may or may not be found.

0 points

No initial reply was made for this thread.

Reply 2 (8 pts)

Student commentary adds value to the ongoing conversation, supports thoughts with academic material. Christian worldview integration found, supported by scripture.

8 points*

Student’s reply adds notable depth to the ongoing conversation and encourages collaborative discussion among peers in a thought-provoking way. Student supports their thoughts with course readings (internal sources) or other academically approved sources (external). Biblical integration found.

7 points*

Student’s reply adds some depth to the ongoing conversation and encourages collaborative discussion among peers in a thought-provoking way. Student supports their thoughts with either course readings (internal sources) or other academically approved sources (external). Biblical integration found.

6 to 1 points*

Student’s reply adds minimal depth to the ongoing conversation among peers in a thought-provoking way. Student supports their thoughts with either course readings (internal sources) or other sources (external). Biblical integration may or may not be found.

0 points

No second reply was made for this thread.

Structure

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Thread (5 pts)

Post should be at least 350 words with proper APA formatting elements and proper grammar and spelling.

5 points*

Post was between 350 and 700 words and exhibited solid APA formatting of paragraphs, citations and references. No grammar or spelling issues found.

4 points*

Post was at least 350 words and exhibited only minor APA formatting issues. Minor grammar or spelling issues found that do not detract from the reader’s ability to comprehend the post.

3 to 1 points*

Post was between 175 and 350 words. Student attempts to illustrate proper APA form in the post. Grammar or spelling issues were notable but did not prevent reader from understanding the key aspects of the post.

0 points

Post was less than 175 words or did not get posted at all or was grammatically difficult to follow.

Reply 1 (5 pts)

Reply should be at least 150 words with proper APA formatting elements and proper grammar and spelling.

5 points*

Reply was between 150 and 300 words and exhibited solid APA formatting of paragraphs, citation, and references. No grammar or spelling issues found.

4 points*

Reply was at least 150 words and exhibited only minor APA formatting issues. Minor grammar or spelling issues found that do not detract from the reader’s ability to comprehend the post.

3 to 1 points*

Reply was at least 100 words. Student attempts to illustrate proper APA form in the post. Grammar or spelling issues were notable but did not prevent the reader from understanding the key aspects of the post.

0 points

Reply was less than 100 words or did not get posted at all or was grammatically difficult to follow.

Reply 2 (5 pts)

Reply should be at least 150 words with proper APA formatting elements and proper grammar and spelling.

5 points*

Reply was between 150 and 300 words and exhibited solid APA formatting of paragraphs, citation, and references. Reply content is fundamentally different than the first reply. No grammar or spelling issues found.

4 points*

Reply was at least 150 words and exhibited only minor APA formatting issues. Minor grammar or spelling issues found that do not detract from the reader’s ability to comprehend the post. Reply content was fundamentally different than the first reply.

3 to 1 points*

Reply was at least 100 words. Student attempts to illustrate proper APA form in the post. Grammar or spelling issues were notable but did not prevent the reader from understanding the key aspects of the post. Reply content may or may not be fundamentally different than first reply.

0 points

Reply was less than 100 words or did not get posted at all or was grammatically difficult to follow. Reply was simply a copy/paste of the first reply with little or no content change.