Employment LawLAWSUITNEGLIGENCE LIABILITYUNQUALIFED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEESFAILURE TO FOLLOW THEIR OWN RULES ERRORSLIABILITY UNQUALIFIED GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATORS AND JUDGESWRONGFUL JUDGEMENTSDENIED BENEF

CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED

Civil Rights Act of 1964 § 7, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq (1964) 42 U.S. Code § 2000e–2 - Unlawful employment practices (a) Employer practices It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer— (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or (2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin

Civil Rights Act of 1991 - Pub. L. 102-166

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to restore and strengthen civil rights laws that ban discrimination in employment, and for other purposes

U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1 FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT SECTION 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

18 U.S. Code § 1623 - False declarations before grand jury or court (a) Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

8 U.S. Code § 1324c - Penalties for document fraud (a) Activities prohibited It is unlawful for any person or entity knowingly— (1) to forge, counterfeit, alter, or falsely make any document for the purpose of satisfying a requirement of this chapter or to obtain a benefit under this chapter, (2) to use, attempt to use, possess, obtain, accept, or receive or to provide any forged, counterfeit, altered, or falsely made document in order to satisfy any requirement of this chapter or to obtain a benefit under this chapter,

Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) (29 USC §651 et seq.; 29 CFR Parts 1900 to 2400)

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Dorothy Ann Artis vs. New London Health Services Appeal No. 17-10303-AA

Amendment 14 equal protection of the law

For cases from federal courts: The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case was 08/04/2017.

A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of Appeals on the following date: 08/04/2017.

The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. § 1254(1).

FEDERAL COUT OF APPEALS

JUDGE STEVE JONES AND TWO OTHER JUDGES DENIED THE DISTICT COURT JUDGE- JUDGEMENT TO ADOPT THE R & R MY RESTITUTION

JUDGE STEVE JONES DENIED JUSTICE AND ALSO FAILED TO PROSECUTE LAW BREAKERS

I WAS TREATED UNFAIRLY AND DENIED DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND JUSTICE

THE JUDGE DID NOT RULE ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTION AND USED HIS PERSONAL JUDGEMENT THAT I WAS “JUST LOOKING FOR SOME MONEY”

This statement is race profiling and violates the Uniform Rules he did not rule according to the truth, law and the constitution