Hello!I need to write an 8000 words senior project/dissertation on the topic for the 31st of March.I am an international business management and law student so the paper should reflect that. The topic
MGT 6297 Senior Project in Business & Management
Spring 2019
Project title: THE MANAGEMENT OF WASTE FROM MINING OPERATIONS: A SOCIOLOGICAL AND LEGAL PERSPECTIVE BASED ON A CASE STUDY
Proposed Senior Project Title: The management of waste from mining operations: a sociological and legal perspective
1. What objectives do you wish to achieve through the completion of the Senior Project?
Through the completion of my Senior Project, I wish to gain a major understanding of the researched topic due to my interest in social responsibility cases. Moreover, I would like to conduct an in dept research in order to assemble my four years experience at Richmond University. I believe that the Senior Project is a challenging opportunity to demonstrate all the knowledge obtained during my journey. My main objective is to demonstrate the relevance and role of the compliance sector nowadays towards the completion of a more socially responsible world. I am analysing the mining sector as it is closely connected to the topic.
2. What work is proposed to achieve the objectives stated above? (Define the work you have specifically in mind: will you need to develop a literature review? if your work is empirically based will developing a section on methodology be required?)
I am intended to analyse multiple data internationally in order to understand how mining companies manage waste in order to comply with the legal requirements and social responsibilities. My work will be mainly composed by an in depth analysis of previous works and articles together with my knowledge on how to connect the various aspects with the legal perspective.
Supervisor (First Grader)/Moderator: ( ) / XY
Areas of Assessment | Aims | 1st Grader’s comments | 2nd Grader’s comments |
1. Quality of Underlying Thesis/arguments |
| ||
Excellent: At least 3-4 of the above is present and well-written. Poor: Two or more of the above are missing and/or writing style makes it difficult to understand what is being argued. GRADE (10%) | |||
2. Discussion/ Body (Analytical Framework, Literature Review, Methodology, appropriate feasibility ‘research’) |
| ||
Excellent: Does all of the above. Outstanding senior projects will clarify how they add to the existing debate and use a variety of academic and management-based sources beyond what was given in the suggested reading list. Very good: Does all the above, possibly with some minor flaws in the provision of evidence. Good-Satisfactory: Does most of the above, with some limitations in the argument or evidence. GRADE (60%) | |||
3. Conclusion/ Policy Recommendations, any emerging management advice | Makes a serious effort with the following:
| ||
Excellent: The above is present and well-written. Poor: Key arguments are not clearly re-stated or linked to the thesis. Writing style makes it difficult to understand what is being concluded. GRADE (10%) | |||
4. Overall Structure |
| ||
Excellent: All of the above is present with no or very few small errors. Poor: Significant problems in layout and writing style. Usage shows carelessness. Harvard system is poorly implemented or absent. GRADE (20%) |
1st Grader’s Grade | 100% | |
2nd Grader’s comments | 100% | |
Agreed Grade |
For internal use only (to be completed by supervisor):
Programme Outcome | Enter Number from 1-5 (1 lowest, 5 highest) |
Broad critical understanding of the fundamental principles, concepts and techniques underlying the Concentration / pathway discipline (A5) | |
Critical analysis and evaluation of a range of ideas, arguments or theories based in Concentration / pathway (B5) | |
Relevance to real practice (C) | |
Interpretation of information presented in a variety of forms and perform relevant tasks of analysis and evaluation (D2) |