I need help with this assignment. The target population will be high school students and the theory I chose was Social Cognatiive Career Theory by Lent, Brown, & Hackett. I also have to reference my c
CNDV 5323 Career Development
Week 5 Assignment Rubric: Career Intervention Program Design 200pts
Criteria | Superior | Good | Fair | Poor |
50-40 | 39-30 | 29-20 | 19-0 | |
Theory/Objectives 50 pts | Includes information about guiding theory chosen for the assignment and relevant research regarding the needs of selected population. Theory chosen is appropriate for target population and rationale for program objectives based on theory are provided. | Includes information on theory chosen with 1-2 researched needs of target population. Rationale for program objectives based on theory are present but may not all be developmentally appropriate. | Includes some information about theory and/or research on target population. Program objectives are vague and/or do not relate to needs of population. | Missing guiding theory for program design. Rationale given for objectives is vague or does not relate to theory. No researched population needs presented. |
Program Design 50 pts | Program should be logical and include:
| Content missing one of 3 required design elements OR rationale for meeting topics unclear | Content missing two of 3 required elements and/or rationale for meetings does not fit. | Program plan does not include required elements. Meeting justification is vague or missing. |
Assessment 50 pts | Program includes both quantitative and qualitative forms of assessment. Selection, description, and rationale for assessment provided. Plan for communicating and interpreting results provided and is age appropriate. Methods/.models for evaluation of program included. | Program includes both quantitative and qualitative forms of assessment. Selection, description or rationale is not provided. Plan for results dissemination may not be suitable for population. Program evaluation methods included. | Only one for of assessment is provided. Selection, description, and rationale are discussed and plan for results dissemination are provided. Program evaluation methods vague or unrelated. | Assessment not discussed or selection, descriptions, and rationale are too vague to understand justification for selection. Does not include methods/models for program evaluation |
| 30-25 | 24-20 | 19-10 | 9-0 |
Critique of program design 30pts | Content includes thorough critique of program design including potential strengths, issues, and obstacles with specific examples related to each. | Content includes some critique of program design including potential strengths, issues, and obstacles. Eamples not specific | Content includes critique of program design but lacks specific examples or is unclear. | Content lacks critique of program design. |
20-15 | 14-10 | 9-5 | 4-0 | |
Mechanics 20pts | Adheres to APA 6th edition guidelines. No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. One additional reference other than textbook is included. | Adheres adequately to APA 6th edition guidelines. Almost no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. One additional reference other than textbook included. | Adheres somewhat to APA 6th edition guidelines. Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Does not include additional reference. | Little or no use of APA style guidelines. Numerous grammatical and punctuation errors. Does not include additional reference. |