5-2 Case Study: Problem AnalysisHide Assignment InformationTurnitin®This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.InstructionsIn this case study, you will examine an organization's attempt at ident

QSO 360 Module Five Case Study Guidelines and Rubric Overview: In this case study, you will examine an organization’s attempt at identifying the root cause of a problem. Prompt: Review the article “ Era of Quality at the Akshaya Patra Foundation” at the end of your textbook , focusing on the organization’s attempt to identify the root cause of a problem using the fishbone analysis. Reflect on the concepts introduced in the assigned chapter while address ing the following questions: 1. How thorough was the an alysis at getting to the root cause of the problem? 2. Do you think enough questions were asked to drill down to the root cause, or were just the symptoms being addressed? Explain. 3. If this problem reoccurred and you were responsible for employing a new DMAIC , what would you do differently? Justify your responses with references from the case and/or authoritative sources. Guidelines for Submission: The Module Five Case Study should follow these formatting guidelines: 1 to 2 pages, double spaced, 12 -point T imes New Roman font, one -inch margins, and citations in APA format. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Analysis Meets “Proficient” criteria and supports explanation using examples from the case and/or authoritative sources Discusses how thorough the analysis in the provided case was at getting to the root cause of the problem Discusses how thorough the analysis in t he provided case was at getting to the root cause of the problem, but explanation lacks required detail Does not discuss how thorough the analysis in the provided case was at getting to the root cause of the problem 30 Questions Meets “Proficient” criteria and supports explanation using examples from the case and/or authoritative sources Explains whether the root cause or just the symptoms were being addressed in the case provided Explains whether the root cause or just the sympto ms were being addressed, but explanation lacks detail to support opinion or contains inaccuracies Does not explain whether the root cause or just the symptoms were being addressed 30 Re -occurrence Meets “Proficient” criteria and supports explanation using examples from the case and/or authoritative sources Describes what could be done differently in employing a new DMAIC if the problem were to reoccur Describes what could be done differently in empl oying a new DMAIC if the problem were to reoccur, but plan does not Does not describe what could be done differently in employing a new DMAIC if the problem were to reoccur 30 account for mistakes made in DMAIC previously implemented, or contains gaps Art iculation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy -to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, o r organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%