InstructionsJasper robs the home of Peter and Carly, two meth dealers. He steals expensive jewelry, meth equipment, and meth. You are the assigned detective to the robbery and receive a reliable tip t

JUS 375 Journal Three Rubric Overview: Journals in this course are private between the student and the instructor. Approach these activities as (a) an opportunity t o reflect upon and apply what you learn each week based on the assigned readings, discussions, and activities, and (b) an opportunity to share your knowledge and expertise based on your educational and professional experiences in the past. As a successful professional, you will need good reflective and wr iting skills. Journal activities offer you the opportunity to further develop these skills. Prompt: Jasper robs the home of Peter and Carly, two meth dealers. He steals expensive jewelry, meth equipment, and meth. You are the assigned detective to the robbery and receive a reliable tip that Jasper has stashed the goods in his home. You want to use thermal imaging to detect the presence of the stolen items. A senior detective advises you that you do not need a warrant. Based upon your reading of Kyllo v. United States , what should you do? How does the court’s decision reinforce ethical behavior and constitutional limits on law -enforcement officers? Write a journal assignment that addresses these questions. Refer to your textbook and relevant scholarly sources to support the points and observations made in your journal assignment . Note: Kyllo v. United States is al so referenced in your final project. Review of this case will also support Section VIII of your final project. Guidelines for Submission: Your journal assignment must be 300 –400 words (excluding the references). Citations should be formatted according to APA style. Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12 -point Times New Roman font, and one -inch margins. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Next Steps: Obtaining a Warrant Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation includes reference to ruling in Kyllo v. United States Includes recommended next steps related to the provided scenario and includes supporting explanation Includes recommended next steps but lacks justification or supporting explanation Does not include recommended next steps or supporting explanation 30 Reinforcement of Ethical Behavior and Constitutional Limits Meets “Proficient” criteria, and submission includes reflection on unique scenarios and situations outside the provided scenario and case Provides explanation and examples about how the Kyllo decision reinforces ethical behavior and constitutional limits on law -enforcement officers Provides a basic explanation of ethical behavior and constitutional limi ts on law - enforcement officers, but not in relation to the Kyllo decision Does not address the ethical behavior and constitutional limits on law -enforcement officers 30 Supporting Evidence and Scholarly Research Meets “Proficient” criteria, and the synthesis of sources is especially well supported, cogent, and insightful Analysis of evidence from text and scholarly sources is logical, well supported, and of appropriate depth and complexity Analysis of evidence from text and scholarly sources is illogical and/or not well supported or lacks appropriate depth and complexity Does not include any evidence from text or scholarly sources to support the points and observations 20 Articulation of Response Meets “Proficient” criteria and has excellent syntax and sentence construction Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 20 Earned Total 100%