Hi I need an assignment of word count 3000 words +/- 10% it’s regarding business report there are two options from which we can choose one, the pattern and the format process added below this docume

Assessment item 2: Business report

Value: 50%

Due date: 26th April 2019 (Friday)

Word Count: 3000 words+/-10%.

Submission: via turnitin word doc.only with less than 25% similarity

Task

Assessment 2 requires you to prepare a business report that addresses one (1) of the following two options. Choose only ONE option to answer.

Option 1- Work design pilot at CERA (Topic 2)

Refer to the story of CERA relating to work design in Topic 2. Using the information in the topic and at least 8 additional sources, provide advice to Rachel Amaro (CERA Drafting Dept) on how to design jobs in her area to support innovative behaviour. At least five of the additional sources must be academic journals or books/book chapters published in the last seven years.

*Note: The job designs suggested must be appropriate for highly skilled employees in an innovative company like CERA and remember you are applying in Rachel’s department so need to focus on her and her employees requirements. Ensure your job design can motivate employees.

Suggested Content: Job Analysis and Job Design, Motivational Job Design (eg. Job Characteristic Model, Job Enrichment, etc), Challenges of Motivational Job Design

Option 2 - The business rationale for diversity management (Topic 3)

Study the business rationale for diversity management and the debates surrounding this using the information in Topic 3, and at least 8 additional sources. At least five of the additional sources must be academic journals or books/book chapters published in the last seven years.

Then, answer this question.

Are you convinced by the business rationale argument for diversity management? What argument would you make to Mark French regarding the business case for focusing on diversity management in CERA?

*Note: Here for business rationale you will be analysing the drivers/necessity of diversity and how diversity management can add value to an organization. Then apply these evidence to CERA and how HR can help with the implementation of diversity.

Suggested Content: Diversity Management, Necessity of Diversity (forces that encourage diversity), Benefits of Diversity, Challenges of Diversity, How to use HR functions, choose and apply any 3 functions (eg Recruitment, Training, and Performance Appraisal. Etc.) to encourage/implement diversity in CERA

General Format

Cover Page

Include a formal cover page that shows student name, student id, lecturer name, the subject code and name and word count.
The word count includes everything other than the cover page, executive summary, table of content and the reference list. It includes in-text citations and text included in images.

Executive Summary (about 250-300 words- not included in word count)
Table of Content and page – not included in word count
Introduction (10-15% of word limit)

General Theory of topic selected
What the report will be about: A navigational purpose.

Body Content (70-80% of word limit)

Journey itself providing detailed explanations by signposts.
Ensure it is divided by clear headings and sub-headings

Conclusion (10-15% of word limit)

What report has been about retrospectively: Reflect on the essence of the journey and summarize clearly all the key point’s discussed

Reference List ( APA6 format, min 8 sources)

Marking Rubric for A2

Criterion and weighting	High distinction	Distinction	Credit		Pass	Fail
Critical analysis and assessment of relevant literature in the development of an argument (40 marks)	Demonstrates critical reading ability in reviewing recent literature. Constructs an evidence-based argument, drawing on academic and professional sources. Uses the literature to develop the student’s own voice in constructing an argument.	Demonstrates critical reading ability, the ability to construct an evidence-based argument and the exercise of independent judgment. There are gaps in critical evaluation of claims and in the use of the literature to develop the student’s own voice.	Demonstrates some degree of critical reading ability, and the ability to construct a limited evidence-based argument. There is an imbalance between description and critical evaluation of the literature. This leads to an argument that is driven more by authors’ claims.	Demonstrates limited critical reading and construction of an evidence-based argument. The discussion demonstrates an attempt to exercise critical, independent judgment; however, it tends to be overly descriptive of the literature. Thus, the argument consists largely of an organised set of claims made by authors.			No attempt to exercise critical, independent judgment; No description of the literature. No argument of an organised set of claims made by authors.
Referencing: (Minimum referencing requirement: eight sources, including five academic sources from the last seven years.) (5 Marks)	Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and conforms exactly to APA style conventions.	Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and conforms to APA style conventions with fewer than three minor errors or omissions which don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.	Referencing is comprehensive and mostly accurate according to APA style conventions. Up to eight minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, underlining) don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.	Referencing is comprehensive and mostly accurate according to APA style conventions. Frequent minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, underlining) don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.			Does not adhere to the referencing requirements. Is not comprehensive and mostly not accurate according to APA style conventions. Frequent errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, underlining) impacts on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.
Report writing technique (5 marks)	The report is formatted correctly. It is written using appropriate language and style. A coherent argument is built, with each point building on the previous one. Each part of argument is connected to the question.	Minor errors in report format. The writing style and language are appropriate for a report. There are minor errors in coherence of the argument and in connections made to the question. It is thus unclear at times why some parts of the argument have been provided.	The report is formatted according to business report conventions, but with some errors in format. The language and writing style are not always appropriate to a report genre. There may be gaps in coherence of the argument, making it difficult to follow.	The report is on the right track, but needs significant improvement in format and/or writing style and/or coherence.			Does not adhere to the report style required. Needs significant improvements in writing style and/or coherence.
Mark /50