I have to write a case study on Donald Trump. In this case study I have to evaulate his mental state and give him a diagnosis as if he were coming in for a psych evualation as a patient. I have to inc
CNDV 5350 Abnormal Human Behavior Final Project Rubric
80-72 | 71-64 | 56-63 | 55-0 | |
Identify etiology and diagnoses based on symptoms presented | Information clearly relates to the main topics of the case presentation. Case is clearly outlined with multiple supporting details and examples. History is clearly related to the case presentation | Information clearly relates to the main topic of the case presentation. Case provides few supporting details or examples. History is poorly related to the case presentation. | Information clearly relates to the main topic of the case presentation. Case provides few if any supporting details or examples. History is not related to the case presentation. | Information has nothing to do with the main topic of the case presentation. Case is not presented with examples or significant elements needed to fully understand the presentation. |
80-72 | 71-64 | 56-63 | 55-0 | |
Construct diagnostic assessment using the DSM | Information clearly relates to the main topics of diagnosis and justification. Information is clearly outlined with multiple supporting details and examples. | Information clearly relates to the main topics of diagnosis and justification. Information is less clearly outlined with many supporting details and examples. | Information clearly relates to the main topics of diagnosis, and justification. Information is not clearly outlined and supporting details and examples are minimal. | Information has nothing to do with the main topics of diagnosis and justification. Information provided does not support the assertions.. |
80-72 | 71-64 | 56-63 | 55-0 | |
Devise treatment strategies for diagnoses | Information clearly relates to the main topic of treatment planning. Information is clearly outlines with multiple supporting details and examples | Information clearly relates to the main topic of treatment planning. Information is less clearly outlined with many supporting details and examples | Information clearly relates to the main topic of treatment planning. Information is not clearly outlined and supporting details and examples are minimal. | Information has nothing to do with the main topic of treatment planning. Information provided does not support the assertions OR treatment plan is nonexistent. |
80-72 | 71-64 | 56-63 | 55-0 | |
Distinguish legal and ethical considerations in presented cases | Legal and ethical considerations are thoroughly addressed with multiple supporting details and examples | Legal and ethical considerations are less thoroughly addressed with some supporting details and examples | Legal and ethical considerations are minimally addressed with few supporting details and examples | Legal and ethical considerations are not addressed |
40-36 | 35-32 | 31-28 | 27-0 | |
Organization and Quality of Information | Information is well organized. Paragraphs are well constructed. Use of subheadings, and information is factual and correct | Information is organized and information is factual and correct | The information appears to be disorganized. The information presented is questionable | Information is not only disorganized but inaccurate |
20-18 | 17-16 | 15-14 | 13-0 | |
Mechanics | No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors | Almost no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors | Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors | Numerous grammatical and punctuation errors |
20-18 | 17-16 | 15-14 | 13-0 | |
Sources | All sources are accurately documented in APA format | All sources are accurately documented, but a few are not in APA format | Some sources are not accurately documented | Numerous sources are not documented accurately and there is not a format used |