the assignment needs to have a good conclusion and structure with an innovative business planand all the below nine points should be covered 1) Key Partners (10%)2) Activities (10%)3) R

EMS5EMT

Assignment 1 (Individual) – Analysis of existing Business Case

In this assignment students will undertake a review of an existing Business Case document and prepare a report on their analysis of the success/ failure risks of each element of the Business Case.

It is anticipated that students will analyze the business case in the context of the 9 elements in the Business Model Canvas Template. A SWOT analysis of each element will form the basis of the analysis.

The report will be a professional style report, suitable for formal submission to the business concerned and for their subsequent use in discussions with a variety of important stakeholders as part of a process to modify their company Business Case.

It is anticipated that students will contact a local business (or a business with whom they already have a relationship) and undertake the analysis on their documentation providing significant value to the business concerned. Students are expected to use their own resources to identify a suitable business.

In the event that a student fails to be able to identify a real business that will allow them access to their business case documentation it will be acceptable to use a Sample Business Case downloaded from the internet.

Each student will use a different Business Case (no sharing of documentation will be allowed).

The resulting report

  • The report should be of a length of approximately 2,000 words ±10%.

  • A copy of the original Business Case will be included as an Appendix to the report.

  • The Executive Summary, Appendix and Reference List are not included in the word count.

  • The report may follow the following structure:

  1. Table of Contents o Executive Summary

o SWOT analysis for each element of the review o Findings and Conclusions

o References

o Appendix (Including a copy of the subject Business Case)

  • References will use either IEEE Standard or Harvard standard citation methods.(http://www.ieee.org/documents/ieeecitationref.pdf) (http://guides.is.uwa.edu.au/harvard)

  • The font should be 12, with Calibri style, 1.5 spaced and justified.

  • Include Headings and Subheadings to easily follow up with your analysis.

    • Remember, you have limited word count so use your words efficiently.


Assignment Due Date:

The Completed assignment will be submitted as a single pdf file through LMS no later than 23.00hrs on Friday 3rd May (end of week 8).

The file name for your report should take the form:

“Workshop Session_Group_Name_Student Number_Assignment 1”.

For example: “Monday 9.00_ Group B_ John Smith_ 123456_Assignment 1

The submission will be made through “Turn-it-in” and you will be allowed to make a draft submission first to self-check for any plagiarism issues prior to making your final submission.

Assessment criteria:

This assignment is worth 30% of the total subject mark.

Breakdown of marks

  • Report structure (15%) – Does the report follow the prescribed structure (3%), is the report written as a professional report suitable for presentation to the business concerned and for their subsequent use (9%), does it meet the word count (3%)

  • Findings and Conclusions (5%) – Does this section systematically highlight the outcomes of the analysis and present logical and well-structured conclusions

  • Does the report provide an effective SWOT analysis of the following attributes of the Business Case under review:

  1. Key Partners (10%)

  1. Activities (10%)

  2. Resources (10%)

  3. Value propositions (10%)

  4. Customer relations (10%)

  5. Channels (5%)

  6. Customer segments (5%)

  7. Cost structure (10%)

  8. Revenue streams (10%)

No logical structure and

AssignmentA

Assessment

Rubric

Criteria

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Very Good

Excellent

N (0-49)

P (50-64)

H3 (65-69)

H2 (70-79)

H1 (80+)

Report (%15)

reasonably well structured

A well-structured report

A professional report that is

A highly professional report

that is extremely well

poor presentation.

report although further

although further structural

well structured. However,

Significant improvements

structural improvements

improvements would have

some minor improvements

structured, uses appropriate

are needed to the structure

could be made. The report is

been beneficial.

in certain areas (such as

sections, headings, cover page,

tables, captions, figure

of the report and the quality

also lacking in certain other

The report would also have

conciseness or presentation)

numbers, page header and

of its presentation. The

areas (such as conciseness

benefited from

would have been beneficial.

footer, proper page margins

length of the report may be

or presentation). The report

improvements to the

and page numbers. The report

well under or well over the

may be well above or below

presentation and may be

has a cover page, table of

suggested length. (2000

the suggested length.

above or below the

contents and executive

words or equivalent).

suggested length.

summary. A concise referencing

system is used and the report is

to the point.

Clever use of colour, annotated

photos and charts can be found

all across the report.

Assignment Outcome (%85)

The report does not

The report provides a

A well-presented report

A well-developed overview

An excellent report

demonstrate that there is a

reasonable overview of the

demonstrating a good

of the requirements of the

providing a professional

clear understanding of the

requirements of the

overview of the but with

assignment clearly

standard of understanding

assignment’s purpose and/

assignment and responds

some areas for

identifying an effective

of the requirements of the

or there are significant gaps

reasonably to each of the

improvement in the clarity

understanding of, and

assignment and

in the requirements of the

major outcome

or presentation of the issues

presenting strongly

demonstrating a detailed

report.

requirements.

required to be considered.

developed outcomes for

understanding and an

each of the issues required

innovated approach to the

to be considered.

issues required to be

considered.