The Athenians were as litigious as modern Americans. This made the abuse of the legal system possible both for prosecutors and for jurors. Find a humorous video or article that discusses an outrag
| A (4) | B (3) | C (2) | D/F (1/0) | |
| Focus: Purpose 5% | Purpose is clear | Shows awareness of purpose | Shows limited awareness of purpose | No awareness |
| Main idea 10% | Clearly presents a main idea and supports it throughout the paper. | There is a main idea supported throughout most of the paper. | Vague sense of a main idea, weakly supported throughout the paper. | No main idea |
| Organization: Overall 15% | Well-planned and well-thought out. Includes title, introduction, statement of main idea, transitions and conclusion. | Good overall organization, includes the main organizational tools. | There is a sense of organization, although some of the organizational tools are used weakly or missing | No sense of organization |
| Organization: Paragraphs: 10% | All paragraphs have clear ideas, are supported with examples and have smooth transitions. | Most paragraphs have clear ideas, are supported with some examples and have transitions. | Some paragraphs have clear ideas, support from examples may be missing and transitions are weak. | Para. lack clear ideas |
| Content: 20% | Exceptionally well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well-developed, supported with specific evidence & facts, as well as examples and specific details. | Well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific. | Content is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature. | Content is not sound |
| Research (if assignment includes a research component) | Sources are exceptionally well-integrated and they support claims argued in the paper very effectively. Quotations and Works Cited conform to MLA style sheet. | Sources are well integrated and support the paper’s claims. There may be occasional errors, but the sources and Works Cited conform to MLA style sheet. | Sources support some claims made in the paper, but might not be integrated well within the paper’s argument. There may be a few errors in MLA style.. | The paper does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not integrated well. They are not cited correctly according to MLA style, nor listed correctly on the Works Cited page. |
| Style: Sentence structure (10%) | Sentences are clear and varied in pattern, from simple to complex, with excellent use of punctuation. | Sentences are clear but may lack variation; a few may be awkward and there may be a few punctuation errors. | Sentences are generally clear but may have awkward structure or unclear content; there may be patterns of punctuation errors. | Sentences aren’t clear |
| Style: Word choice, Tone 10% | There is clear use of a personal and unique style of writing, suited to audience and purpose; the paper holds the reader’s interest with ease. | There is an attempt at a personal style but style of writing may be awkward or unsuited to audience and purpose; the reader may lose interest in some sections of the paper. | There is little attempt at style; reads as flat and perhaps uninteresting in content, which is usually generalized and clichéd. | No attempt at style |
| Style: Details and Examples 10% | Large amounts of specific examples and detailed descriptions. | Some use of specific examples and detailed descriptions. May have extended examples that go on for too long. | Little use of specific examples and details; mostly generalized examples and little description. | No use of examples |
| Grammar & Mechanics 10% | Excellent grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation. | A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation, but not many. | Shows a pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax and/or punctuation. Could also be a sign of lack of proof-reading. | Continuous errors |
