Hi I need this assignment asap

Page 1 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline COMMONW EALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has bee n reproduced and comm unicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of th e Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this comm unication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or comm unication of this material by you ma y be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business Schoo l Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CR ICOS Provider Code 02426B. A ssessme nt 2 Information Sub ject Code: MBA502 Subject Name: Emotional Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence and Diversity Assessment Titl e: Assessment 2 Assessment Type: Individual Presentation – seven -minute video W eighting: 30 % To tal Mark s: 30 Submissio n: Via Turn itin Due Date: Monday of Week 10 Your T ask You r t ask is to pre pare a video pre sen tation. Assessme nt Descr iption This is an individua l assignmen t. You are r equired to condu ct seconda ry res ea rch on a local Austral ian-ba sed or international firm to highlight ho w it emb races just one form of divers ity. You can f ocus on cultural diver sity or a ny othe r f orm (gen der, s exua l orien tation, age, disability, etc.). The ma in focus of you r video pres en tation shou ld be to highlight and critique you r ch osen firm by pres en ting issu es rela ted to how it m ana ges tha t spe cified diversity. Assessme nt Instructions In you r video , it is rec om m ended that you include the following: A pe rsona l introdu ction: who are you ? An overview of the firm: wha t does it do and why did you select it? Its diversity-relat ed initiatives: wha t are they? Sou rces: from whe re have you ob tained this inform ation? A cr itique of the diversity initi atives: ha ve the y be en successful? Rec omm end ation s: wha t else cou ld the firm do in rela tion to diversity? Add itiona l s ources: on wha t ba sis are you m aking tho se re comm en dations? You will nee d to subm it you r file via the link pro vided on Turni tin. Page 2 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline COMMONW EALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has bee n reproduced and comm unicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of th e Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this comm unication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or comm unication of this material by you ma y be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business Schoo l Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CR ICOS Provider Code 02426B. Important Study Information Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity . All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade? Click here for answers to these questions: http://www.kbs.edu.au/current -students/student -policies/ . Word Limits for Written Assessments Submis sions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded. Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information. Page 3 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline COMMONW EALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has bee n reproduced and comm unicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of th e Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this comm unication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or comm unication of this material by you ma y be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business Schoo l Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CR ICOS Provider Code 02426B. A ssessme nt Marking G uide Criteria F (Fail) 0%–49% P (P ass ) 50%–64% CR (Cre dit) 65%–74% D (Di stinc tion) 75%–84% HD (Hi gh Distinc tion) 85%–10 0% Ma rk Ass essment Con tent (Subje ct sp ecifi c) OUT OF 30 MAR KS Video Com ponent (Sub mitted via Turniti n) OUT OF 30 MARKS for online students or for Power Point slides for face-to-face stu dents Log os (clarity and log ic of the argu men ts presented ) The presentation of issues an d recomm enda tions is nei ther clea r no r log ically compe lling. Persuasiveness of presentation suffers from somewha t vagu e and shaky argu men tation. The argu men ts presented are somewha t clear but coul d ha ve be en logically mo re compe lling. The argu men ts presented are clea r an d logically compe lling. The argu men ts presented are very clea r and log ically compe lling. /10 Etho s (credibility of the presenters) No effort was ma de to estab lish the cred ibility of the presenters. Som e limited effort was made to establish the cred ibility of the presenters. The effort was not very effec tive. The presenter ma de a goo d effort to establish their credibility bu t there is some room for imp rovemen t, eithe r in the cha racter or compe tence dim ensions. The presenter did a very goo d job of establishing their cred ibility. The presenter did an excel len t job of establishing their cred ibility (character and compe tence ). /10 Patho s (appea l to the audience ) The presenter failed to consider the needs and feelings of their targe ted audi ence. The audi ence was disen gag ed most of the time . The presenter ma de a fee ble attempt to conside r the nee ds an d feeling s of thei r targeted audi ence. The audience was sometime s disengag ed. The presenter ma de a goo d effort to con side r the ne eds and feel ing s of thei r targeted audi ence bu t with little impact. The presenter’s way of commu nicating was effective, as the y add ressed the nee ds and f eel ing s of thei r targeted audi ence with very goo d resp onses. The presenter’s way of commu nicating was very effective and addressed the nee ds and feeling s of thei r targe ted audi ence with grea t resp onses from aud ience. /10 Comments