Note: please read the file carefully it is based on case study*****And the references should be done in APA( American Psychological Association (APA)) referencing style and the reference should contai

COIT20249 Assessment Details

Assessment item 3—Report


Due date:

11.55 pm AEST, Friday, Week 10

ASSESSMENT

Weighting:

40%

3

Length:

2500 words +/- 250 words

Objectives

Please refer to the Unit Profile to see how this assessment item relates to the Unit Learning Outcomes.

This assignment is designed to stimulate critical thinking outside of the classroom by requiring students to write a formal academic report. You will need to follow the ARE process described in chapters 2 and 3 of Your Business Degree 2 (prescribed textbook for COIT20249) to analyse the assessment task, research relevant information and evaluate the information you find. This information should be used to write an academic report in which you present your findings or outcomes and make recommendations for future practice. Professional writing and writing reports are described in chapters 4 and 5 of Your Business Degree 2. This assessment task will assess your skills in critical thinking, researching information, forming an opinion, academic writing, logical ordering of ideas and your ability to support your arguments with quotes from literature. These objectives will be measured by the ‘closeness of fit’ to meeting the assessment task, assessment requirements and marking criteria.

Please note that there is a wealth of material available on the Moodle Unit website that you should use to help you through the process of searching for and gathering relevant information, evaluating that information and writing your report.

General Assessment Criteria

Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant.

The report must focus on the case study scenario given in the Assessment Task section. Any assessment items that do not address the case study scenario may be awarded 0 (zero) marks.

If you use Track Changes when writing your report you must ensure that the submitted document is the final and correct version of the document. That is, if your submitted report contains Track Changes or Comments or any other editing marks it may be awarded 0 (zero) marks. It is your responsibility to submit the final and correct version of your report.

The length of the report must be within the recommended range. If the report exceeds the maximum word count the marker will stop marking after 2750 words.

Moodle auto-submits draft files that are in Moodle at the originally set deadlines. Files that are auto-submitted will not be reverted to draft status except in extenuating circumstances (evidence required). It is your responsibility not to leave draft assessments in Moodle at the due date and time if the files are not ready to be submitted for marking. However, late submissions may attract penalties.

Assessment Task

Students are required to write an academic report as per the format outlined in chapter 5 of the textbook. The report must follow the CQU APA referencing style. See the American Psychological

Association (APA) abridged guide updated Term 2 2018 available from: https://www.cqu.edu.au/student-life/services-and- facilities/referencing/cquniversity-referencing-guides. Please note that the prescribed textbook uses APA referencing guidelines. See also the Referencing Style subsection below.

The report is to be based on the following cybersecurity use case for office and home systems.

With the recent progress of computer networks, growth of interconnected devices through Internet, cloud computing, big data and web services, the number of cyber threat/attack has grown exponentially. Malware attack, phishing, man-in-the middle attack, denial-of-service are some of the common types of cyberattacks that hits businesses every day. Therefore, cybersecurity is an essential practice for the digital age to protect systems, networks, applications, data/information and hardware from cyberattacks or unauthorised access, and to ensure the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of information. The goal is to prevent the risks to individuals and organisations such as, damage or loss of sensitive data, stolen money, theft of intellectual property, theft of personal and financial data, disruption to business.

The major challenges to cybersecurity efforts are mobile connectivity, online payment, the ever increasing use of cloud and Internet of Things (IoT) devices, remote access and third- party outsourcing. These days almost every business has a website and externally exposed systems that make it easier for the attackers to enter the internal networks. Moreover, most smart devices (both at home and at work) are connected to the Internet which makes the system prone to attack. Hence, ensuring cybersecurity is an absolute must for every business and also for individuals. Common types of cybersecurity are application security, hardware security, network security, cloud security, Data Loss Prevention (DLP), Cryptography, Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) and Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS), Identity and Access Management (IAM), and Antivirus/anti-malware.

You are a Security Consultant of a famous security consulting company that provides security consulting services to a wide range of business, individual, education institutes and companies. Recently one of your clients, ABC Technologies (ABCT) has contacted your organisation to prepare a document on Cybersecurity as it was the recent victim of several cyberattacks.

Here are the details of your client company:

ABCT is an Australian technology company whose line of business ranges from different types high-tech products which include both software and hardware. ABCT has multiple offices nationwide, and two overseas offices. All computer services are provided by virtual private network (VPN), which is maintained in Canberra (the head office). ABCT allows their employees to work from home (using VPN

connections) and also have a Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policy for their employees who work onsite. Each location also provides free wireless LAN access to visitors/guests. ABCT currently have 10,000 regular customers. All their customer and product information are stored in the cloud. Because the company was the victim of several recent cyberattacks, they are concerned that company’s data might have been compromised and hackers might have gotten hold of customers’ information. They are also worried that they would lose the trust of their loyal customers, which could potentially result in a loss of revenue. So ABCT wants to improve their security system and security related policies. As a first step, they want your organisation to prepare a document on cybersecurity to train their staff on the basics of cybersecurity. As part of that, your team leader asked you to research and write a report that should cover the following tasks:

  1. Explain what is cybersecurity and why it is important for ABCT?

  1. Identify and explain at least 3 security vulnerabilities in ABCT’s system (you need to consider ABCT’s case as presented above). You need to justify your answer with evidence from research.

  1. Do some research, and find and list 5 different types of emerging threats (that might affect ABCT) and describe each of them in detail. In your discussion include what damage the attack might cause, who is responsible for these attacks and their attack techniques.

  1. Do some research, analyse the information and give your recommendations (at least 3) how to protect home and office from cyberattack.

You have to complete this investigation and write a report for your team leader in the next three weeks. Since this is an initial investigation, moreover, some of the staff do not have IT background, the report does not require in-depth technical details.

Please note that you might need to make some assumptions about the organisation in order to write this report. These assumptions should match the information in the case study and not contradict with the objectives of the report. They should be incorporated in the introduction of your report when you describe the organisation and outline the problem to be solved. Relevant assumptions should be incorporated when addressing tasks 2 and 3 above. To avoid loss of marks, do not make assumptions that are not relevant or contradictory, or will not be used in your report discussion.

Specifically your report should include the following (word count details are approximate guidelines):

  1. Title page: unit code and name, assessment number, report title, assessment due date, word count (actual), student name, student number, CQU email address, campus lecturer/tutor, and unit coordinator. If applicable, add extension request ID and the new due date. Must be formatted to a standard required for a professional/business report. Check week 6 materials for example of a professionally formatted title page. Not included in the word count.

  1. Executive summary: should include the purpose of the report, the problem including key issues considered and how they were investigated, your findings, and overview of your recommendations.

3

This part should be approximately three quarters of an A4 page but must not be longer than one (1) A4 page. Not included in the word count.

  1. Table of Contents (ToC): should list the report topics using decimal notation. Need to include the main headings and subheadings with corresponding page numbers, using a format that makes the hierarchy of topics clear. Because you are including a ToC the report pages should be numbered in the footer as follows: title page has no page number; and main text to have Arabic numerals commencing at 1. Create the ToC using MS Word’s ToC auto-generator rather than manually typing out the ToC. Instructions can be found here https://support.office.com/en-gb/article/Create-a-table-of-contents-or-update-a-table-of-contents-eb275189-b93e-4559-8dd9-c279457bfd72#__create_a_table. Not included in the word count.

  1. Introduction: provide a brief description of the organisation as given in the case scenario including any assumptions, a concise overview of the problem you have been asked to research, the main aims/purpose of the report, the objectives to be achieved by writing the report (include the tasks outlined in the case study) and how you investigated the problem. Provide an outline of the sections of the report. Should be approximately 250 words.

  1. Body of the report (use appropriate headings in the body of the report.): Define key terms you will use in your report that are directly related to the problem and the technology considered. Then present your ideas on the topic and discuss the information you found in your research that was relevant to the report’s objectives. Provide an analysis of the information that you gathered. Ensure that you explore the tasks listed in the case study scenario.

Do NOT use generic words such as ‘Body, Body of the Report, Tasks’ as section headings. Create meaningful headings and subheadings that reflect the topic and content of your report. Should be approximately 1850 words.

  1. Conclusion: restate the purpose of the report and key issues investigated and the related findings based on your research and analysis. Explain the significance of your findings for addressing the problem stated in the case scenario and any limitations. State how your report has achieved its objectives and any future work to be considered. Should be approximately 250 words.

  1. Recommendations: 3 to 5 recommendations required. Format according to the Report Writing Guidelines discussed in the Unit. Should be approximately 150 words.

  1. Reference list. Not included in the word count.

  1. Appendices if necessary. Not included in the word count.

Note: Additional information regarding this assignment may be placed on the Moodle Unit website as required. Check the Moodle Unit website at least once a week for further information relating to the report. Regular access to the Moodle Unit website is a requirement of this Unit.

Other Assessment Requirements

Your response should be structured as a report (chapter 5 of textbook), written in accordance with standard academic writing principles (chapter 4 of textbook). The report must be written using your own

4

words with any in text citations clearly marked (see Referencing Style subsection below) . You may discuss the assessment task with other students and the lecturing staff but you must WRITE the report YOURSELF in your own words.

You will need to conduct research to support your arguments using at least ten (10) but no more than 15 current references. Note that all the references you choose to use should be evaluated using the Triple-R framework in the research stage of preparing your Report (do NOT include this evaluation in the Report). You must have a minimum of ten (10) current references in your reference list. At least six (6) of these references should be from refereed academic journals and conference proceedings. Other references could be sourced from books, industry websites and magazines. All sources should be current that is, within last 5 years. Minimum requirements relate to a Pass mark. You are encouraged to use more than the minimum requirements (up to 15 for a HD mark for References 2 criterion) for a better quality outcome to your report through improving the quality of your analysis.

The assignment should demonstrate a logical flow of discussion, and be free from typographical, spelling and grammatical errors. It should be prepared in MS-Word (or equivalent) using 12 point font (Times New Roman), 1.5 line spacing and margins of 2.54 cm. The final outcome must be clean and tidy.

It is highly recommended that you submit your assignment to the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) AT LEAST ONE WEEK before the due date. The ALC can check your report for correct structure, referencing, paragraphing and some language issues.

Referencing Style

Your report must include in-text referencing and a correctly cited list of references ordered alphabetically by surname of first author, in accordance with the CQU APA referencing style of referencing as referred to in the American Psychological Association (APA) abridged guide updated Term 1 2018 available from: https://www.cqu.edu.au/student-life/services-and-facilities/referencing/cquniversity-referencing-guides.

The report must be written using your own words with any in text citations clearly acknowledged using the CQU APA referencing style.

Helpful information on referencing techniques and styles can also be found on CQU’s referencing webpage:

https://www.cqu.edu.au/student-life/services-and-facilities/referencing

Marks will be deducted for poor referencing, falsifying references, having less than ten (10) recent references, or for significant variations to the required word length.

Use quotation marks for direct quotes and you must include the author, date and page number(s) with the quote as per the referencing standards.

Academic Integrity

Students must write the Report themselves. You may be asked to prove that you have written the Report. You should keep evidence that you have written the Report yourself, for example, early drafts of your Report, and annotated copies of references and notes of using the Triple R technique to evaluate the references. Once the assessment is marked, the Unit Coordinator (or nominee) may

request additional written information and/or an oral discussion to clarify the student’s understanding of the submitted work. Failure to comply and/or to demonstrate an understanding of the Report’s content could result in 0 marks for the Report.

ALL assignments will be checked for plagiarism (material copied from other students and/or material copied from other sources) using TurnItIn. If you are found to have plagiarised material or if you have used someone else’s words without appropriate referencing, you will be penalised for plagiarism which could result in zero (0) marks for the whole assignment. If you falsify references you will also be penalised. In some circumstances a more severe penalty may be imposed such as having a plagiarism incident raised.

The University’s Academic Misconduct Procedure is available in the policy portal https://www.cqu.edu.au/policy.

Useful information about academic integrity (avoiding plagiarism) can be found in the ALC resources on the Moodle Unit website and at:

https://www.cqu.edu.au/student-life/services-and-facilities/referencing https://www.cqu.edu.au/student-life/services-and-facilities/referencing/cquniversity-referencing-guides

Guidelines with respect to self-referencing are available on the COIT20249 Moodle website. Submission

The report has to be submitted using the COIT20249 Moodle Unit website on or before the due date. The submission link can be accessed through the Assessment block.

Before submitting your assignment, you should check it against the detailed assessment criteria in the following table to ensure that you have satisfactorily addressed all the criteria that will be used to mark your report.

It is your responsibility to ensure that your report is submitted for grading. At the due date of the assessment Moodle will auto-submit files that have been uploaded and left as drafts. However, any files uploaded after the due date must be manually submitted. This means that if you have been granted an extension or are uploading a late assessment (after the due date) you must complete the Moodle submission process. Further details on completing the submission process are available via the ‘Moodle Help for Students’ link in the Support block of your Moodle website.

If your report is left as a draft in Moodle after the due date it will accrue a late penalty. Late submissions attract a penalty of 5% per day of the total available mark for the individual assessment item. See the Assessment Policy and Procedure – Higher Education Coursework in the policy portal https://www.cqu.edu.au/policy.

Note: if your Report is auto-submitted the submission will not be reverted to draft unless there are extenuating circumstances. Any request is to go to the Unit Coordinator and must be supported by evidence.

Marking Criteria

This assessment is criterion referenced which means your work is assessed against the criteria in the marking rubric below.

Criteria

Quality

Total

Mark

High Distinction

Distinction

Credit

Pass

Fail

Executive

The executive summary contained:

The executive summary

The executive

The executive summary

Entire sections of the executive

4

summary

- a brief description of the purpose of the report

contained the proper

summary had

lacked clarity and has

summary are missing. There is a lack

sections and generally

sections which were

incomplete or missing

of detail and the problem is not well

- the definition of the problem, key issues

well written but there is

too brief. Did not

sections. It did not

explained.

explored, and how they were investigated

some room for

include enough

clearly explain the

Executive summary too short or long -

improvement.

detail.

problem, how it was

- a summary of what you found and what you

did not meet the structural

investigated and your

concluded

requirements in the specifications

recommendations.

- overview of your recommendations

- meets the recommended length as in given the

specifications.

Table of contents

Lists the report topics using decimal notation.

All the headings and

Some things missing

Includes the main

Table of contents missing or very

1

Includes meaningful main headings and

subheadings are present

from the table of

headings only.

poorly done.

subheadings with corresponding page numbers.

in the table of contents

contents.

Pages are numbered in

Pages are not numbered in the report.

Format makes the hierarchy of topics clear.

with correct

Pages are numbered

the report

corresponding page

Auto generated using MS Word.

in the report

number. But there is

All pages are numbered in the report

some room for

improvement

Pages are numbered in

the report.

Introduction

Set the scene for the report; gave some

The introduction

The introduction had

The introduction lacked

The introduction was missing or was a

4

background information for the topic. Included a

contained the proper

parts which were too

clarity

repeat of the executive summary.

brief description of the organisation.

parts but there is room

brief.

Had a number of

It did not clearly introduce the report.

for improvement.

Did not include

incomplete or missing

enough detail.

parts.

Stated the objectives of the investigation. Included

It did not clearly

Introduction too short or long - did not

the problem you are addressing and the key issues

introduce the report.

meet the structural requirements in the

to be explored.

specifications

Explained the research method used to gather

information.

Outlined the sections of the report.

Body of the

Selected exact amount of relevant material that

Selected large amount of

Selected adequate

Selected adequate

Selected too little material or material

12

amount of relevant

Report: Selection

supports argument with no contradictions.

relevant material.

amount of material not

that is irrelevant.

material.

and sequencing of

Substantial, logical, & concrete development of

Offered solid

Some development

all of it relevant.

No development of ideas or original

subject material;

ideas. Arguments were logical and clear.

development of ideas but

of ideas; not much

Not much development

reasoning.

including evidence.

original reasoning.

less original reasoning.

of ideas. Very little

All tasks in the specifications addressed.

Minimal addressing of tasks related to

Some of the tasks in

original reasoning.

Most of the tasks in the

the report topic. No key topics defined.

Assumptions were made explicit. Key terms were

the specifications

specifications were

were addressed.

Only a few tasks were

defined.

Offered simplistic, undeveloped, or

addressed.

Assumptions are not

addressed.

cryptic support for the ideas

Details were germane, original, and convincingly

Assumptions were not

always recognised or

Offered somewhat

interpreted.

made explicit. Most

Key information not supported by any

always recognised or

Key terms were

obvious support that may

evidence.

made explicit. Key terms

defined.

be too broad.

were defined.

Contains some

Some Key terms defined.

appropriate details or

Contained some

Inappropriate or off-topic

examples.

appropriate details or

Contains some

generalisations, faulty assumptions,

examples.

Details were too general,

errors of fact.

appropriate details or

not interpreted, irrelevant

examples.

to problem, or

inappropriately

repetitive.

Conclusion

Problem restated clearly, main points and

The conclusion

The conclusion had

The conclusion lacked

The conclusion is missing or was a

3

parts which were too

supporting arguments summarised.

contained the proper

clarity and had

repeat of the executive summary.

brief or missing. Did

Stated the significance of the findings and that the

parts but did not include

not include enough

incomplete or missing

Conclusion was difficult to understand

enough detail.

detail.

parts.

objectives of the report had been met.

May have included

or not linked to the overall purpose of

some new material.

No new material.

It did not clearly

the Report.

No new material.

conclude the report.

Included new material.

May have included some

Conclusion too short or long - did not

new material.

meet the structural requirements in the

specifications

Recommendations

Suggested 3 specific actions to address the

Suggested 3 specific

Suggested 2-3

Suggested at least 2

Recommendations missing or

3

problem.

actions relevant to the

actions that were

actions. Not all actions

irrelevant to the problem and/or did not

problem. Actions were

relevant to the

were relevant to the

Actions were clearly based on the findings of the

based on the findings of

problem.

problem.

relate to the findings.

report.

the report but there is

some room for

Not all actions were

Not all actions were

improvement

based on the findings

based on the findings of

of the report.

the report.

Organisation and

Sequence of ideas was effective.

Sequence of ideas was

Sequence of ideas

May have had abrupt

Poorly worded sentences. No linkages

3

good.

did not always flow

shifts and ineffective

structure of the

between paragraphs.

Excellent sentence structure. Well-constructed

Good sentence structure.

in a logical manner.

flow of ideas.

Report:

paragraphs; clear linkages between paragraphs.

Linkages between

Showed minimal effort or lack of

- ideas/main points;

Written expression was clear and correct;

paragraphs were mostly

Some good sentence

Some awkward

appropriate.

structure. Linkages

sentences; paragraphs

comprehension of the assignment.

- grammar,

Grammar excellent; correct use of punctuation;

between paragraphs

not well linked.

A few errors in

punctuation and

minimal or no spelling errors; and evidence of

could be improved.

Paragraph structure not

Numerous major grammatical and

thorough proof-reading.

grammar. Made

Some brief,

well integrated;

spelling; and

spelling errors which seriously

Observed professional conventions of written

occasional problematic

undeveloped

contained extraneous

- structure of

word choices or syntax

paragraphs.

information.

detracted from understanding the

sentences and

English and report format.

errors. A few spelling or

writing; or incomprehensible.

punctuation errors.

Some distracting

Some major grammatical

paragraphs.

Observed professional

grammatical errors.

or proofreading errors.

Did not meet professional conventions

Errors in punctuation

Language frequently

conventions of written

and spelling. Little

weakened by inexact

of written English and report format.

English and report

evidence of proof-

word choices. Spelling

format; made a few

reading.

errors.

Evidence of poor planning and/or no

minor or technical

serious revision of writing.

errors.

Needed to observe

Needed to observe

professional

professional conventions

conventions of

of written English and

written English and

report format; made

report format; made

repeated errors.

few errors.

Report Layout

Title page contained all necessary information.

Title page contained all

Title page contained

Some necessary

Title page missing or missing

2

necessary information.

all necessary

information was missing

necessary information.

- Title page;

Correct length as specified.

Correct length within +/-

information.

from the title page.

Tidy final version - including no, track changes or

Reasonable length

Outside the 10% of

Too short (<2000 words or too long

- length and

100 - 200 words of the

unnecessary spacing or indentations, correct

required length.

within +/-200 - 300

required length - within

>3000 words).

formatting.

alignment of sections.

Mostly tidy final version

words of the

+/-300 - 500 words of

Formatted using 12 point font (Times New

Formatted correctly but

required length.

the required length.

Extensive improvements need to

missed one key

ensure good layout. Formatted

Roman), 1.5 line spacing and margins of 2.54 cm.

requirement.

Tidy final version.

Can improve the final

Some minor

version appearance.

incorrectly.

formatting errors.

Major errors in

formatting.

References (1):

Thorough research indicated; clear well-thought

Research was generally

Some evidence of

Basic research;

Little or no evidence of research and

4

out analysis clearly integrated into discussion.

thorough; analysis was

research; basic

weaknesses evident in

Evidence of

analysis of information.

generally well done;

analysis; some

analysis.

research and

Analysed and evaluated information in great

integrated into

integration into

Little evidence of

Neglected important references

analysis of the

depth.

discussion.

discussion.

analysis and evaluation

relevant to the problem.

Used references to support, extend, and inform,

references based on

Analysed and evaluated

Analysed and

of information;

the ARE

but not substitute writer’s own development of

information in

evaluated

recounted and described.

Inappropriate or off-topic

ideas.

considerable depth.

information in

framework.

Used relevant references

generalisations, faulty assumptions,

Combined material from a variety of sources.

reasonable depth,

Selection and use

Used references to

some description.

but lacked in variety of

errors of fact.

Did not overuse quotes.

support, but not

references and/or the

of references based

substitute writer’s own

Used references to

skilful combination of

Overused quotations or paraphrasing to

on the Triple R

All references conformed to the Triple R

development of ideas.

support, but not

references.

substitute writer’s own ideas.

substitute writer’s

framework

framework and recent (within the last 5 years).

Combined material from

own development of

Combined material from

Possibly used source material without

(relevant, reliable,

a variety of sources.

ideas.

a few sources.

acknowledgement.

and reputable).

Did not overuse quotes.

Combined material

Quotations and

Most references

from a few sources.

paraphrases may be too

Selected references did NOT conform

long or not well

to the Triple R framework - including

conformed to the Triple

Did not overuse

integrated into the text.

R framework and all

quotes.

Most of the references

much older than the last 5 years.

were recent (within the

last 5 years).

More than 50% of

did NOT conform to the

the references

Triple R framework or

conformed to the

were NOT recent (older

Triple R framework

than the last 5 years).

and recent (within

the last 5 years).

References (2): In-

More than ten current references 14 - 15*.

More than ten current

At least ten current

At least ten current

Less than ten current references.

4

Approximately 60% or more of the references

(up to 13) references

references including

references but less than

text citations and

were academic references; All of sources are very

including more than six

at least six academic

six academic references.

None or only one or two academic

reference list.

well reputed.

academic references. Not

sources.

Some errors with APA

references.

all of the sources are

• Current

Thorough referencing. Citations and reference list

very well reputed.

Some errors in APA

referencing style.

Inconsistent with APA referencing

accurate and consistent with APA referencing

referencing style for

references –

style.

All citations/references

citations and/or

Incomplete reference list.

style.

published within

All citations/references listed.

listed.

reference list.

References not cited

last 5 years;

*Note: Use of more than 15 references not

All

properly in text.

Significant problems with citations and

references.

penalised but no extra marks. Excessive number

citations/references

of references may impact on the original

listed.

development of ideas and hence marks to other

criteria.

Comprehension

The content of the report was unable to be read and understood by the marker and another independent reviewer. Therefore, the assessment will receive a 0 mark

40

without further feedback.

10