My instructionsThis is an assignment that I have to do base on a homeopathic remedy that I must take in order to calm a symptom that I am having, the symptom that I picked is HEADACHE. According to th
Reading View. Press Alt Shift A for accessibility help.
Case Brief — The Darling Case
Introduction:
By strengthening inter-professional communication for physicians and health professionals, patient outcomes can improve and patient-centered care is encouraged. The Darling case (Chapter 8) illustrates how “inter-professional communication issues are associated with a wide variety of medico-legal problems, including delays in diagnosis, mishaps in surgery, medication adverse events, and failures in monitoring or follow up of patients.”
Read these two brief articles, Chapter 1, and Chapter 8 of the text to prepare. (2011). Strengthening inter-professional communication, CMPA Empowering better healthcare. Thompson, S. (2017). What is the corporate negligence doctrine?, Small Business Chronicle.
Instructions:
For this assignment, I am tasking you with developing a presentation to co-present with the medical director of your institution. It will be used to train current and new physicians on the importance of inter-professional collaboration and methods for addressing ethical issues in the medical organizations. You will use the Darling case to illustrate the key points of your presentation. The audience is physicians. Use the Code of Ethics for physicians, nurses, and organizations found in your book as a guide.
Your presentation must include:
1. Briefly describe the legal issues in this case.
2. Briefly outline the four elements of negligence (found in Chapter 1) as it applies to this case. Include how the hospital failed in its ethical duty to the patient.
3. Define inter-professional communication. Deduce from the outcome of this case the issues of inter-professional communication.
4. Describe how corporate negligence would have been avoided with inter-professional communication.
Presentation Rubric
Presentation Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Description of Legal Issues
20.0 pts
A: Introduces the importance of legal issues and ethics for physicians by providing a concise, clear, and comprehensive description of the legal issues in the case. Provides specific examples from the case to support observations and insights.
17.0 pts
B: Introduces the importance of legal issues and ethics for physicians by providing a brief and clear description of the legal issues in the case. Provides examples from the case to support observations and insights. Minor points require further development.
15.0 pts
C: Introduces the importance of legal issues and ethics for physicians by providing a general description of the legal issues in the case. Some details are missing or extraneous details are included. Provides general examples from the case in attempt to support observations and insights; examples are oversimplified and need more details to connect with the description.
13.0 pts
D: Introduces the importance of legal issues and ethics for physicians by providing a description of the legal issues from the case; however it is unclear and oversimplified and/or there are inaccuracies in the description. Any examples provided are based on personal knowledge and/or inaccurate or incomplete interpretation of the case
11.0 pts
F: Introduces the importance of legal issues and ethics for physicians by identifying the legal issues from the case; however there are many inaccuracies with the information OR no description is provided. No examples are provided. Reader cannot ascertain issues being addressed.
0.0 pts
0: Question not answered/ assignment not submitted.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Application of four elements of negligence
20.0 pts
A: Clearly identifies and defines the four elements of negligence. Thoroughly discusses each element and how it applies to the case, making clear connections between course materials and the case to illustrate points. Includes reasoning for how the hospital failed its ethical duty to the patient.
17.0 pts
B: Identifies the four elements of negligence. Discusses each element and how it applies to the case, making connections between course materials and the case to illustrate points, with minor details missing. Includes reasoning for how the hospital failed its ethical duty to the patient. Additional details would strengthen the response.
15.0 pts
C: Identifies the four elements of negligence. Briefly discusses the elements and how they apply to the case; details may be missing from some of the elements. Any connections made between course materials and the case to illustrate points are oversimplified. More details are needed to make explicit connections. Includes a brief explanation on how the hospital failed its ethical duty to the patient.
13.0 pts
D: Identifies at least three of the elements; however, the discussion on how they apply to the case is unclear and missing major details. Attempts to explain how the hospital failed its ethical duty to the patient, but more clarification is needed, specifically in relation to the elements of negligence.
11.0 pts
F: Identifies at least three of the elements; however, there is no discussion on how they apply to the case OR Discussion contains major inaccuracies, demonstrating misconceptions with the content.
0.0 pts
0: Question not answered/ assignment not submitted.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Explanation of issues related to inter-professional communication
20.0 pts
A: Clearly defines inter-professional communication. Clearly and fully explains issues of inter-professional communication, using specific examples from the case.
17.0 pts
B: Defines inter-professional communication. Explains issues of inter-professional communication, using examples from the case. Additional details would strengthen the response.
15.0 pts
C: Defines inter-professional communication; minor details are missing. Briefly explains some issues of inter-professional communication. Explanation is missing major details that would clarify why the issues are problematic.
13.0 pts
D: Defines inter-professional communication; points are missing from the definition. Identifies issues of inter-professional communication with some brief description; however, there is little to no connection of the issues to the case.
6.0 pts
F: Attempt to define inter-professional communication is missing key details. Reader cannot discern what the term means from the definition provided. Identifies issues of inter-professional collaboration; however, no explanation is provided.
0.0 pts
0: Question not answered/ assignment not submitted.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Conclusion
20.0 pts
A: Thoroughly describes how inter-professional communication can alleviate corporate negligence. Response reflects student’s critical and informed evaluation of the evidence and content.
17.0 pts
B: Describes how inter-professional communication can alleviate corporate negligence. Response reflects student’s points from the presentation. Minor points require further development.
15.0 pts
C: Briefly describes how inter-professional communication can alleviate corporate negligence. Information is oversimplified; details are missing that would clarify points for the reader.
13.0 pts
D: Identifies several ways inter-professional communication can alleviate corporate negligence. However, many details are needed to clarify the connection between the conclusion and the presentation.
11.0 pts
F: Mentions that inter-professional communication can alleviate corporate negligence; however, no description or details are provided.
0.0 pts
0: Question not answered/ assignment not submitted
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Audience and organization
10.0 pts
A: Communication style and word choice is appropriate (e.g., professional). Written work progresses logically and ideas are complete. Bulleted points are well-developed; transitions are seamless. Relevant graphics and talking points are included.
8.0 pts
B: Communication style and word choice is generally appropriate (e.g., professional). Written work progresses logically and ideas are fairly complete. Bulleted points are developed, but lack cohesion in places. Graphics are mostly relevant and talking points mostly convey necessary information.
7.0 pts
C: Communication style and word choice is generally appropriate (e.g., professional) with occasional use of informal language or terminology inappropriate to audience. Written work usually progresses logically and ideas are fairly complete. Bulleted points are inconsistent or lack cohesion. Graphics are included, but are mostly irrelevant. Talking points convey minimal information.
6.0 pts
D: Attempts appropriate (e.g., professional) communication style and word choice; however, there is frequent use of informal language or terminology inappropriate to audience. Written work often does not progress logically and ideas are often not fully formed. Bulleted points are not well-developed and the reader finds it difficult to follow the presentation flow. Graphics are irrelevant. Talking points not present.
5.0 pts
F: Uses informal or inappropriate language or terminology. Written work lacks logical flow and ideas are not fully formed. Bulleted points not developed and reader cannot follow the presentation. Graphics and talking are not present
0.0 pts
0: Assignment not submitted
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Syntax, Mechanics, & APA formatting
10.0 pts
A: Clearly and consistently uses proper sentence structure, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Clearly and consistently uses proper APA formatting in all aspects of the paper.
8.0 pts
B: Uses proper sentence structure, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. There are a few minor errors, which do not interfere with meaning. APA formatting is used, there may be a few minor formatting errors (e.g., reference page, in text-cites, title page, running header).
7.0 pts
C: Generally uses proper sentence structure, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. There are a few errors that interfere with meaning. APA formatting is used, there are some minor formatting errors (e.g., reference page, Darling casein text-cites, title page, running header).
6.0 pts
D: There are many sentence structure, grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with meaning. APA formatting is used; however, there are major formatting errors (e.g., not linking in-text citations with reference page, not citing sources).
5.0 pts
F: There are major sentence structure, grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that make it extremely difficult to read and understand. APA formatting is seldom used correctly.
0.0 pts
0: Assignment not submitted.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
Previous
Next
