BMGT 364 Exercise 3: Week 5NOTE: All submitted work is to be your original work. You may not use any work from another student, the Internet or an online clearinghouse. You are expected to under
Criteria
Equivalent to an A
Equivalent to n B
Equivalent to a C
Equivalent to a D
Equivalent to an F
Introduction
0.3 points
Writes an introduction that captures the reader's attention, gives context to the paper, and builds to the thesis that defines the main points to be discussed in the paper.
(0.27 - 0.3)
0.26 points
Writes an introduction that provides context to the paper and presents the thesis statement that defines the main points to be discussed in the paper.
(0.24 - 0.269)
0.22 points
Writes an introduction that provides a general context to the paper or the thesis is vague or underdeveloped.
(0.21 - 0.239)
0.2 points
Attempts to write an introduction but has little to no context to the paper and the thesis is missing main points or no thesis statement provided.
(0.18 - 0.209)
0 points
Fails to write an introduction.
(0)
/ 0.3
Products
1.5 points
Thoroughly and correctly discusses what products would be best for the initial launch based on market analysis using research and the course material to support the ideas, reasoning and conclusions made.
(1.35 - 1.5)
1.28 points
Correctly discusses what products would be best for the initial launch based on market analysis andcourse material to support the reasoning and conclusions made; needs clarity or some development; not thorough enough.
(1.2 - 1.34)
1.12 points
Attempts to discuss what products would be best for the initial launch based on market analysis and attempts to use course material to support the reasoning and conclusions but significant clarity or development is needed.
(1.05 - 1.19)
0.98 points
Incorrectly discusses what products would be best for the initial launch based on market analysis and use of the course material to support the reasoning and conclusions; missing key information making a weak presentation.
(0.9 - 1.04)
0 points
Little to no attempt todiscuss what products would be best for the initial launch based on market analysis.
(0 - 0.89)
/ 1.5
Cultural considerations
1.5 points
Thoroughly and correctly identifies and discusses the cultural considerations when relocating overseas or to Ohio using the course material and research to support the ideas, reasoning and conclusions made.
(1.35 - 1.5)
1.28 points
Correctly identifies and discusses the cultural considerations when relocating overseas or to Ohio using course material and research to support the reasoning and conclusions made; needs clarity or some development; not thorough enough.
(1.2 - 1.34)
1.12 points
Attempts to identifies and discusses the cultural considerations when relocating overseas or to Ohio and attempts to use course material and research to support the reasoning and conclusions but significant clarity or development is needed.
(1.05 - 1.19)
0.98 points
Incorrectly identifies and discusses the cultural considerations when relocating overseas or to Ohio using the course material and research to support the reasoning and conclusions; missing key information making a weak presentation.
(0.9 - 1.04)
0 points
Little to no attempt to identify and discuss the cultural considerations when relocating overseas or to Ohio,
(0 - 0.89)
/ 1.5
Best location to source the organic materials for your ingredients. Research and identify where current infant formula companies are sourcing the materials and provide explanation as to why this
1.5 points
Thoroughly and correctly identifies the best location to source the organic materials for ingredients and where current infant formula companies are sourcing the materials using the course material and research to support the reasoning or justification for location.
(1.35 - 1.5)
1.28 points
Correctly identifies the best location to source the organic materials for your ingredients and where current infant formula companies are sourcing the materials using course material and research to support the reasoning or justification made; some development in either support or reasoning needed to strengthen decision.
(1.2 - 1.34)
1.12 points
Attempts to identify the best location to source the organic materials for your ingredients and where current infant formula companies are sourcing the materials and attempts to support the reasoning or justification; significant development in either support or reasoning needed to strengthen decision.
(1.05 - 1.19)
0.98 points
Incorrectly Identifies the best location to source the organic materials for your ingredients and where current infant formula companies are sourcing the materials using the course material and research to support the reasoning and conclusions; may present research but does not explain why or how the location is best; major development needed to strengthen decision.
(0.90 - 1.04)
0 points
Little to no attempt toIdentify the best location to source the organic materials for your ingredients and where current infant formula companies are sourcing the materials.
(0 - 0.89)
/ 1.5
Explain whether the Great Start Nutrition should consider sourcing leaders from other divisions of the company taking them to the new location or should the focus be on hiring local personnel as line managers, shift supervisors, and senior leaders
1.2 points
Thoroughly and correctly explain whether the Great Start Nutrition should consider sourcing leaders from other divisions of the company taking them to the new location or should the focus be on hiring local personnel as line managers, shift supervisors, and senior leaders using the course material, case scenario facts and research to support the ideas, reasoning and conclusions made.
(1.08 - 1.2)
1.02 points
Correctly explain whether the Great Start Nutrition should consider sourcing leaders from other divisions of the company taking them to the new location or should the focus be on hiring local personnel as line managers, shift supervisors, and senior leaders using course material, case scenario facts and research to support the reasoning and conclusions made; some development needed.
(0.96 - 1.07)
0.9 points
Attempts to explain whether the Great Start Nutrition should consider sourcing leaders from other divisions of the company taking them to the new location or should the focus be on hiring local personnel as line managers, shift supervisors, and senior leaders and attempts to use course material, case scenario facts and research to support the reasoning and conclusions; significant development is needed.
(0.84 - 0.95)
0.78 points
Incorrectly explain whether the Great Start Nutrition should consider sourcing leaders from other divisions of the company taking them to the new location or should the focus be on hiring local personnel as line managers, shift supervisors, and senior leaders using the course material, case scenario facts and research to support the reasoning and conclusions; missing key information making a weak presentation.
(0.72 - 0.83)
0 points
Little to no attempt to explain whether the Great Start Nutrition should consider sourcing leaders from other divisions of the company taking them to the new location or should the focus be on hiring local personnel as line managers, shift supervisors, and senior leaders
(0 - 0.71)
/ 1.2
Discuss what positions would be needed under each of the Assistant Executive Directors and what will be the focus of these positions
1.2 points
Thoroughly and correctly discusses what positions would be needed under each of the Assistant Executive Directors and what will be the focus of these positions using the course material to support the ideas, reasoning and conclusions made.
(1.08 - 1.2)
1.02 points
Correctly discusses what positions would be needed under each of the Assistant Executive Directors and what will be the focus of these positions using course material to support the reasoning and conclusions made; needs some development.
(0.96 - 1.07)
0.9 points
Attempts to discusses what positions would be needed under each of the Assistant Executive Directors and what will be the focus of these positions and attempts to use course material to support the reasoning and conclusions but significant development is needed.
(0.84 - 0.95)
0.78 points
Incorrectly discusses what positions would be needed under each of the Assistant Executive Directors and what will be the focus of these positions using the course material and research to support the reasoning and conclusions; missing key information making a weak presentation.
(0.72 - 0.83)
0 points
Little to no attempt todiscusses what positions would be needed under each of the Assistant Executive Directors and what will be the focus of these positions.
(0 - 0.71)
/ 1.2
Attention to Instructions
1.3 points
The paper contains completion of all major assignment tasks including writing the report. The paper also includes completion of all minor aspects of the assignment such as third person writing, required use of course readings, outside sources if needed, and assignment format.
(1.17 - 1.3)
1.1 points
The paper contains completion of all major assignment tasks including writing the report. The paper missed 1 minor aspect of the assignment such as third person writing, required use of course readings, outside sources if needed, and assignment format.
(1.04 - 1.16)
0.98 points
The paper missed 1 major assignment task (including writing the report) or 2 minor aspects of the assignment.
(0.91 - 1.03)
0.84 points
The paper missed 2 major assignment tasks (including writing the report) or 3 minor aspects of the assignments.
(0.78 - 0.9)
0 points
The paper missed 3 or more major assignment tasks (including writing the report) or four or more minor aspects of the assignment.
(0 - 0.77)
/ 1.3
Writing Mechanics
1 point
Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English using paragraphs and sentences rather than bullets, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used. 0 to 2 errors noted.
(0.9 - 1.0)
0.85 points
Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 3 to 6 errors noted.
(0.8 - 0.89)
0.75 points
Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 7 to 10 errors noted.
(0.7 - 0.79)
0.65 points
Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 10 errors found.
(0.6 - 0.69)
0 points
Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible; or errors are too plentiful to count.
(0 – 0.59)
/ 1
APA Style (6th ed.)
0.5 points
1 - 2 APA style or usage errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper; Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.
(0.45 - 0.5)
0.42 points
Attempts in-text citations and reference list but 3 - 4 APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1 - 2 times.
(0.4 - 0.44)
0.38 points
Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; APA style errors are noted throughout document; Fails to use APA citations when appropriate 3 times in document.
(0.35 - 0.39)
0.32 points
Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; Fails to use APA citation when appropriate 5 - 6 times; Fails to use APA citations when appropriate 5 - 6 times in document or presents a total of 1 - 2 in-text citations and reference list in a paper when requires APA citations are needed throughout the document.
(0.3 – 0.34)
0 points
No attempt at APA style; or attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other.
(0 – 0.29)
/ 0.5
