What are the legal consequences of the Erin Andrews' invasion of privacy case? Is this case relevant to the recent allegations that some Hilton hotel rooms have hidden cameras that videotape unsuspec
Response 1:
In the current digital era, it is very easy to spread the embarrassing images through online which becomes viral. This type of the videos are highly offensive and there is an expectation of privacy for the criminal and the civil lawyers(Caristi & Davie, 2018). This type of privacy invasion case has taken place with Erin Andrews who is a TV host and a network sportscaster. Erin Andrews was a reporter for ESPN and she was been unknowingly filmed while she was dressing in the year 2008. Erin Andrews was staying at a hotel room and the incident took place at Marriot Hotel in Nashville. The Nashville Hotel owner had given a customer room next of Ms. Andrews that has greatly shown an impact on her and Mr. Barrett has shot the film from a peephole and uploaded it online. From the incident case, it is noticed that Andrews had filed a case against Barrett the victim and the person were prisoned for about 2.5 years. The Jury has awarded victim for the damage of invasion of her privacy from the Marriot hotel owner and the person Barrett(Trager, Ross, & Reynolds, 2017). In the current case both the owner, employees, and Mr. Barrett were responsible for the privacy invasion that has happened with Erin Andrews. The case is directly related to the lawsuit because the domestic violence abuser will seek to find its victim as similar as it happened in Andrew's case. In this case, it is found to physically harm more than the invasion of privacy (Benjamin, 2018). Erin Andrew’s case represents a keen element to understand regarding the privacy rights of the individuals and also to protect the individual’s women, girls from such type of privacy crimes.
Response 2:
A Nashville, Tennessee jury is concerned with the video recording and distribution of Erik Andrews's players during his stay at the Marriott Hotel in his country's laws. The jury found a worker Windsor Capital 49 percent wrong with Michael David Barrett's 51 percent error. He also found out that Windsor was a member of West End Hotel Partners. After a couple of hours of research a couple of weeks later, the jury saw employees neglecting the athlete's privacy when he was a guest. (Tesse, J. 2016). Mr. Barrett agreed that the restaurant in Nashville and Columbus, Ohio, would change the restaurant and seize some of Andrews' amazing videos and print them online. He was sentenced to two and two years in prison. Others insist that West End Hotel Partners is not a Barrett actor. As a result, Andrews' children are not their guest on holiday. However, the jury decided that the hotel had first impressed Andrews. At trial, Andrews testified to an expert in the post-traumatic disease.
The decision can be answered in many ways. First of all, there are some cases where the video maker really does justice in the local court. Secondly, it is rare that this quarterly resolution against the hotel relies almost entirely on emotional discovery. The decision to travel to a company: Homeowners and tourists should be strengthened by maintaining statistics and considering their role in how to address residential requests for a room. That’s why it’s not just about creating shopping and hotel services. Recent journalists Erin Andrews is celebrating internationally, and pays much attention and maintains confidentiality. While in the Nashville Marriott at Vanderbilt University in 2008, he met Michael David Barrett at his home in Andrews, a nearby home. When papers were placed on Barrett's websites, the FBI alleged that he was arrested and shot. Barrett was convicted and spent two years in prison for his crime. Andrews later ignored the attacks in West End Hotel Partners, Hotel Owner, Windsor Capital Group, Staff, Barrett and Marriott International. (The Tennessee court ruled that Marriott International had no charge and withdrew the case from the company.) Two weeks later in March, the jury awarded Andrews $ 55 million and destroyed it.
"The result is researching workers in a way that protects visitor privacy," said David Samuels, head of the company's corporate office and department office, said Michel man & Robinson. "There have been significant improvements in the region over the last 10-15 years, but this situation has shown areas that need potential growth." Under the stream, Barrett claimed that Andrews had gotten the number rooms by using a fixed cell phone and a hotel and asked the company's owner to link to Andrews. (Tesse, J. 2016). When the call is called, the number of the building appears on the LCD display. As he climbed onto the ceiling, he saw that the house near Andrews was changing by asking for a home and asking for the house in front of the chair. “It shows weakness,” said Samuel, adding that hotels need to ensure that customers can only use the machine to reveal the name and number of rooms. "Hotels hire staff to monitor clothes and use a non-user machine. Mobile phones are used to access the non-employees screen."
