Please note, EVB assignment 5 corrections is due urgently by tomorrow 7/10/19 but for EVB Module 4 assignment due 7th WK, could be received on thursday 7/11/19. Please FILL OUT all the
Part A
Perform a critical appraisal of each of the following 4 articles - Be sure to include:
(i) An evaluation table
(ii) A level of the evidence table
(iii) An outcome synthesis table
Part B
From your created tables (i), write 1-2 pages narrative of your critical appraisal summary.
(ii) One paragraph should describe and justify the best practices that were identified from the research.
(iii) Include an introductory paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Note Below are the 4 articles and the tables.
(1)Sultana,H.,Junaid,A.& Amir,M.(2016).Case-Control study of measles outbreak in tertiary care hospital.Pakistan.Journal of Medical Research 55(1),7-10
Mclaughin,J.Verlander ,N.Yates,J.Beck, C. (2019) Cross-sectional studying to describe and explore factors associated with measles immunizations and recording among cases linked to an outbreak, South West England. 2016 20(3), 150-153
Awotiwon,A., Oduwole, O., Sinha, A., & Okwundu, I. (2017). Zinc supplement for treatment of measles in children. The Cochran database of systematic reviews GCD011177. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10-/002/14651858.CD011177pub3
Jacobsen, C. Jacobsen, M., Cocyne-Beasley, T., Asafo-Adjei, K., & Szilagyi, G. (2018). Patient reminder and recall interventions rates. The Cochrane data base of system reviews, 1CD003941. https://doi-orgezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1002/14651858.CD0039.41.pub3
Evaluation Table
Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Full citation of selected article | Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 |
|
|
|
| |
Conceptual Framework Describe the theoretical basis for the study
|
|
|
|
|
Design/Method Describe the design and how the study was carried out
|
|
|
|
|
Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients, attrition rate, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Major Variables Studied List and define dependent and independent variables |
|
|
|
|
Measurement Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions |
|
|
|
|
Data Analysis Statistical or qualitative findings |
|
|
|
|
Findings and Recommendations General findings and recommendations of the research |
|
|
|
|
Appraisal Describe the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility of use in your practice? |
|
|
|
|
General Notes/Comments |
|
|
|
|
Levels of Evidence Table
Use this document to complete the levels of evidence table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Author and year of selected article | Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 |
|
|
|
| |
Study Design Theoretical basis for the study
|
|
|
|
|
Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients |
|
|
|
|
Evidence Level * (I, II, or III)
|
|
|
|
|
Outcomes
|
|
|
|
|
General Notes/Comments |
|
|
|
|
* Evidence Levels:
Level I
Experimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysis
Level II
Quasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis
Level III
Nonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesis
Level IV
Respected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidence
Level V
Literature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidence
Outcomes Synthesis Table
Use this document to complete the outcomes synthesis table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Author and year of selected article | Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 |
|
|
|
| |
Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients |
|
|
|
|
Outcomes
|
|
|
|
|
Key Findings
|
|
|
|
|
Appraisal and Study Quality
|
|
|
|
|
General Notes/Comments |
|
|
|
|