Trace the history of cannabis use in medicine for the treatment and management of illness via nursing scholarly journal articles. Examine your sources for the following information below and describe
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Name: NURS_6501_Week9_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View
| Outstanding Performance | Excellent Performance | Competent Performance | Proficient Performance | Room for Improvement |
Main Posting: | 44 (44%) - 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) | 40 (40%) - 43 (43%) Responds to the discussion question(s) | 35 (35%) - 39 (39%) Responds to most of the discussion question(s) | 31 (31%) - 34 (34%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s) | 0 (0%) - 30 (30%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) |
Main Posting: | 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely | 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) Written clearly and concisely | 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Written concisely | 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) Written somewhat concisely | 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Not written clearly or concisely |
Main Posting: | 10 (10%) - 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation | 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA | 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA | 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA | 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation |
First Response: | 9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings | 8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings | 7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting | 6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth | 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth |
First Response: | 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues | 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues | 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues | 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication | 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective |
First Response: | 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation | 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA | 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA | 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA | 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation |
Second Response: | 9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty | 8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings | 7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting | 6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth | 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth |
Second Response: | 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues | 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues | 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues | 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication | 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective |
Second Response: | 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation | 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA | 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA | 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA | 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation |
Total Points: 100 |
Name: NURS_6501_Week9_Discussion_Rubric