Please help with this assignment. Please strictly follow the attached rubric and address each topic.
HCM 415 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
Continue analyzing the situation your case study’s healthcare organization faces.In this milestone, you will continue to evaluate the impact of the mission and vision of the healthcare organization’s strategic plan. You will also consider how the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats effect the environmental factors that confront the healthcare organization.
You will develop a 2–4-page SWOT analysis of the healthcare organization. Be sure to address the following:
Briefly summarize your case study.
To what extent do the organization’s policies address this issue? Be sure to justify your response.
To what extent does the organization’s strategic planning around this issue align with its organizational mission and vision? Use evidence and examples to justify your reasoning.
What do you feel are the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) with regard to this issue? Be sure to substantiate your claims with evidence and specific examples.
Based on the SWOT analysis you performed, what environmental factors are at play in terms of this issue and what is their impact on the delivery of care within the organization? In other words, identify any new policies or new trends that will affect your day-to-day operation.
Guidelines for Submission: This short paper should be between 2 and 4 pages, not including cover page and references. This paper should be in APA format.
| Critical Element | Exemplary (100%) | Proficient(90%) | Needs Improvement (75%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
| Overview | Meets “Proficient” criteria and expertly balances brevity with required detail | Provides a brief summary of the selected case study | Provides a summary of the selected case study, but response is verbose or has gaps in required detail | Does not provide a summary of the selected case study | 5 |
| Analysis: Policies | Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes nuanced inferences about the efficacy of organizational policies or strategic planning in addressing issues | Logically assesses how effectively organizational policies or strategic planning address the issue, justifying response | Assesses how effectively organizational policies or strategic planning address the issue, justifying response, but with gaps in logic, detail, or justification | Does not assess how effectively organizational policies or strategic planning address the issue | 20 |
| Analysis: Mission and Vision | Meets “Proficient” criteria and draws nuanced connections between organizational strategic planning and organizational mission and vision | Logically assesses the extent to which strategic planning around issue aligns with mission and vision, justifying reasoning with evidence and examples | Assesses the extent to which strategic planning around issue aligns with mission and vision, justifying reasoning with evidence and examples, but response is cursory or illogical or has gaps in justification | Does not assess the extent to which strategic planning around issue aligns with mission and vision | 20 |
| Analysis: SWOT | Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates exceptional insight into organizational strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats | Logically assesses organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with regard to issue, substantiating claims with evidence and specific examples | Assesses organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with regard to issue, substantiating claims with evidence and examples, but with gaps in logic, detail, substantiation, or specificity of examples | Does not assess organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with regard to issue | 25 | ||
| Analysis: Environmental Factors | Meets “Proficient” criteria and draws nuanced connections between environmental factors and delivery of care | Accurately identifies environmental factors contributing to issue and determines their impact on delivery of care based on SWOT analysis | Identifies environmental factors contributing to issue and determines their impact on delivery of care based on SWOT analysis, but response has gaps in accuracy or detail | Does not identify environmental factors contributing to issue and does not determine their impact on delivery of care based on SWOT analysis | 25 | ||
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-toread format | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas | 5 | ||
| Total | 100% | ||||||
