Write a 5 paragraph essay with a credible scholarly journal, school website and PMI Reference with page numbers and a letter for a group project lV.

PRM 520 – Group Project Rubric (40 possible points ) Name of Student: _________________________________ Date Completed: ___________________________ Excellent/ Exceptional - Corresponds to an A - to A (40 - 36 points ). Performance is outstanding; significantly above the usual expectations. Good/Very Good - Corresponds to a grade of B to B+ ( 35.9 – 32.2 points ). Skills and standards are at the level of expectation. Fair - Corresponds to a B- (32.1 – 30 points ). Skills and standards are acceptable , but improvements are needed to meet expectations. Marginal - Corresponds to a C (29.9 -28 points ). Performance is marginal ; the skills or standards are not sufficiently demonstrated at this time. Needs Assistance - Corresponds to a n F ( 28 points or below ) - This criterion is missing or not in evidence. Project Management Outcomes Needs Assistance (F) Marginal (C) Fair (B-) Good/Very Good (B to B+) Excellent/Exceptional (A- to A) Total Points Critical thinking - identifies process inputs ; employs tools and techniques ; creates outputs (15 points) No inputs or very few inputs (0-11.24 points) Identifies some inputs (11.25 -11.99 points) Identifies all inputs ; uses tools and techniques ; creates some outputs (12.0 -12.44 points) Identifies all inputs ; uses tools and techniques ; creates most outputs (12.45 -13.49 points) Identifies all inputs ; uses tools and techniques ; creates all outputs (13.5 -15.0 points) Integrati ve thinking - demonstrates process data flow; identifies updates needed to project management plan, project processes, and other organizational process assets as appropriate (15 points) Little to no integrative thinking (0-11.24 points) Identifies one or two additional areas affected; communicate s to some stakeholders (11.25 -11.99 points) Identifies additional areas affected ; emplo ys some assets ; communicates to some stakeholders (12.0 -12.44 points) Identifies most additional areas affected ; employs most assets ; identifies some change requests ; communicates to most stakeholders (12.45 -13.49 points) Identifies all additional areas affected ; employs assets as needed; identifies change requests, communicates to appropriate stakeholders ; includes plan to update affected areas of project management plan (13.5 -15.0 points) Evidence of expansive reading; minimum of 3 citations; correct citations and referencing (5 points) Problems with 1 or more of the following: lack of citations and/or citations not credible, reference list not in proper format (0-3.69 points) Minimum 3 credible citations , and references are listed in proper format (3.7 -3.99 points) Minimum 3 credible additional resources outside of assigned reading (4.0 4.14 points) Minimum 3 credible plus at least 1 peer -reviewed source (4.15 -4.49 points) Two or more peer -reviewed sources (4.5 -5.0 points) Met deadline; Turnitin similarity %; quoting & paraphrasing issues; spelling/grammar (5 points) Problems with 3 or more of the following: late, issues with Turnitin, several spelling/grammar issues, does not follow procedures (0-3.69 points) Issues with Turnitin ; does not follow procedures (3.7 – 3.99 points) Spelling/grammar issues (4.0 -4.14 points) On time ; no issues with Turnitin ; meets requirements (4.15 -4.49 points) On time ; no issues with Turnitin ; well written (4.5 -5.0 points) 1. Articles from the Project Management Institute (PMI®) are considered peer reviewed. Grade: ___/ 40 Comments: