Legislative Action Description Healthcare policy has been a critical aspect of political administrations over the past 100 years. Understanding the political process and how healthcare policy has chan

Total Points Possible

100

Insufficient/Not Evident

Progressing

Competent

Exemplary

Earned Points

Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation

(5 Max Point Value)

(0pts.)

Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English grammar and mechanics observed. Proper writing mechanics were not used.

(1-2 pts.)

6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing mechanics somewhat used.

(3-4 pts.)

3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing mechanics mostly used.

(5 pts.)

0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation.

Paper meets minimum 2-page length requirement (5 Max Point Value)

(0 pts.)

Paper is not submitted.

(1-2 pts.)

Paper is less than 1 page in length

(3-4 pts.)

Paper is between 1-2 pages in length

(5 pts.)

Paper is at least 2 full pages in length.

Included a memo highlighting the key points of each Legislative Action.

(10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Transferrable Skills

Communication:

Discussed the purpose of each legislative action (15 Max Point Value)

(0-4pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(5-8 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(8-11 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(12-15 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Communication:

Described the problem/problems each action is trying to solve or prevent (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Communication:

Discussed other viewpoints or opposing viewpoints of each action(10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Information Literacy:

Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a minimum of 3 credible, academic sources. Used proper APA format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

No sources used. No elements of APA formatting used.

(4-6 pts.)

More than one of the required sources is missing from the research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Some elements of APA formatting used. Did not include in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

(7-8 pts.)

One of the required sources is missing from the research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Most elements of APA formatting used and/or did not include in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

(9-10 pts.)

Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a minimum of 3 credible, academic sources. Used proper APA format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

Critical Thinking:

For the memo, discussed why legislative actions chosen best coincide with the position and facility that they’ve chosen (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Ethics and Professional Responsibility:

For the memo, discussed stance on the chosen legislative actions and how they impact the core beliefs and ethics of the organization. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Communication:

Writing exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and spoke from an “employee to supervisor” point of view. Vocabulary tied to the purpose of the research.

(10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

Writing is inappropriate, does not use audience-specific tone and vocabulary is not tied to the purpose of the research.

(4-6 pts.)

Writing is somewhat exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully speak from the correct point of view. Vocabulary didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.

(7-8 pts.)

Writing is mostly exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully speak from the correct point of view and/or vocabulary didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.

(9-10 pts.)

Writing exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and spoke from an “employee to supervisor” point of view. Vocabulary tied to the purpose of the research.

Communication:

Followed proper memo/business formatting guidelines and use “block letter formatting (5 Max Point Value)

(0pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate. Didn’t include any of the memo formatting guidelines

(1-2 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of memo formatting and business writing guidelines. Some elements were still missing

(3-4 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors. Small elements of memo letter format and business guidelines were missing.

(5pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows a complete understanding memo formatting and business writing rules and guidelines.

Total Points Possible

100

Insufficient/Not Evident

Progressing

Competent

Exemplary

Earned Points

Described the specific interest of the lobbyist in each example (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Included an agenda that discussed each example and highlighted whether the actions of lobbyists have a positive or negative effect on healthcare legislation

(10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation

(10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English grammar and mechanics observed. Proper writing mechanics were not used.

(4-6 pts.)

6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing mechanics somewhat used.

(7-8 pts.)

3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing mechanics mostly used.

(9-10 pts.)

0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation.

Paper meets minimum 4-page length requirement (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

Paper is not submitted.

(4-6 pts.)

Paper is less than 2 pages in length

(7-8 pts.)

Paper is between 3-4 pages in length

(9-10 pts.)

Paper is at least 4 full pages in length.

Transferrable Skills

Communication:

Discussed position on whether the lobbyists’ actions are positive or negative and supported arguments with details (15 Max Point Value)

(0-4pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(5-8 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(9-11 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(12-15 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Ethics and Professional Responsibility:

Discussed in detail the ethical issues and moral disputes for each example. (15 Max Point Value)

(0-4pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(5-8 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(9-11 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(12-15 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Information Literacy:

Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a minimum of 5 credible souces with 3 being academic sources. Used proper APA format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material. (15 Max Point Value)

(0-4 pts.)

No sources used. No elements of APA formatting used.

(5-8 pts.)

More than one of the required sources is missing from the research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Some elements of APA formatting used. Did not include in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

(9-11 pts.)

One of the required sources is missing from the research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Most elements of APA formatting used and/or did not include in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

(12-15 pts.)

Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a minimum of 5 credible sources, with 3 being academic. Used proper APA format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

Communication:

Writing exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and spoke from an “employee to supervisor” point of view. Vocabulary tied to the purpose of the research.

(10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

Writing is inappropriate, does not use audience-specific tone and vocabulary is not tied to the purpose of the research.

(4-6 pts.)

Writing is somewhat exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully speak from the correct point of view. Vocabulary didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.

(7-8 pts.)

Writing is mostly exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully speak from the correct point of view and/or vocabulary didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.

(9-10 pts.)

Writing exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and spoke from an “employee to supervisor” point of view. Vocabulary tied to the purpose of the research.

Communication:

Followed proper agenda/business formatting guidelines and is professional in appearance (5 Max Point Value)

(0pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate. Didn’t include any of the agenda formatting guidelines

(1-2 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of agenda formatting and business writing guidelines. Some elements were still missing

(3-4 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors. Small elements of agenda format and business guidelines were missing.

(5pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows a complete understanding agenda formatting and business writing rules and guidelines.

Total Points Possible

100

Insufficient/Not Evident

Progressing

Competent

Exemplary

Earned Points

Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation

(10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English grammar and mechanics observed. Proper writing mechanics were not used.

(4-6 pts.)

6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing mechanics somewhat used.

(7-8 pts.)

3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing mechanics mostly used.

(9-10 pts.)

0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation.

Paper meets minimum 4-page length requirement (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

Paper is not submitted.

(4-6 pts.)

Paper is less than 1 page in length

(7-8 pts.)

Paper is between 2-3 pages in length

(9-10 pts.)

Paper is at least 4 full pages in length.

Included a one – page information sheet covering the important information about the Medicare Program

(10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Transferrable Skills

Communication:

Discuss the purpose of the Medicaid program (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Communication:

Describes other viewpoints of the program. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Critical Thinking:

Discusses whether the program is effective and offer evidence to support your rationale. (15 Max Point Value)

(0-4pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(5-8 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(9-11 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(12-15 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Information Literacy:

Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a minimum of 3 credible, academic sources. Used proper APA format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

No sources used. No elements of APA formatting used.

(4-6 pts.)

More than one of the required sources is missing from the research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Some elements of APA formatting used. Did not include in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

(7-8 pts.)

One of the required sources is missing from the research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Most elements of APA formatting used and/or did not include in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

(9-10 pts.)

Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a minimum of 3 credible, academic sources. Used proper APA format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

Communication:

In the Information Sheet, there is enough information for the staff to have an educated conversation with a patient about Medicaid. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Communication:

In the information sheet, used audience specific language, clarity of voice, and pronunciation of words. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

Presentation is inappropriate, does not use audience-specific tone and vocabulary is not tied to the purpose of the research.

(4-6 pts.)

Presentation is somewhat exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully speak from the correct point of view. Vocabulary didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.

(7-8 pts.)

Presentation is mostly exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully speak from the correct point of view and/or vocabulary didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.

(9-10 pts.)

Presentation exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and spoke from an “employee to supervisor” point of view. Vocabulary tied to the purpose of the research.

Communication:

For the information sheet, employ formatting features such as proper use alignment, font and overall design to make a professional document. (5 Max Point Value)

(0pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate. Didn’t include any information sheet formatting and business writing guidelines.

(1-2 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of information sheet formatting and business writing guidelines. Some elements were still missing

(3-4 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors. Small elements of information sheet formatting and business guidelines were missing.

(5pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows a complete understanding information sheet formatting and business writing rules and guidelines.

Total Points Possible

100

Insufficient/Not Evident

Progressing

Competent

Exemplary

Earned Points

Describes a minimum of three examples of similarities and differences in health care reform policies in the two states (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation

(5 Max Point Value)

(0pts.)

Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English grammar and mechanics observed. Proper writing mechanics were not used.

(1-2 pts.)

6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing mechanics somewhat used.

(3-4 pts.)

3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing mechanics mostly used.

(5 pts.)

0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation.

Paper meets minimum 4-page length requirement (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

Paper is not submitted.

(4-6 pts.)

Paper is less than 1 page in length

(7-8 pts.)

Paper is between 2-3 pages in length

(9-10 pts.)

Paper is at least 4 full pages in length.

Transferrable Skills

Communication:

Discuss the purpose of each state’s reform (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Information Literacy:

Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a minimum of 5 credible sources with 3 being academic. Used proper APA format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

No sources used. No elements of APA formatting used.

(4-6 pts.)

More than one of the required sources is missing from the research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Some elements of APA formatting used. Did not include in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

(7-8 pts.)

One of the required sources is missing from the research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Most elements of APA formatting used and/or did not include in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

(9-10 pts.)

Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a minimum of 5 credible sources, with 3 being academic. Used proper APA format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

Critical Thinking:

Discusses if Rasmussen Healthcare Systems should expand to the second state. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Ethics and Professional Responsibility:

Discusses in detail some of the ethical issues and moral disputes in each state’s reform (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Communication:

Included a PowerPoint highlighting the specific policy changes in each state’s reform/similarities & differences/final recommendation

(10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Communication:

In the PowerPoint, used audience specific language, clarity of voice, and pronunciation of words..(5 Max Point Value)

(0pts.)

Presentation is inappropriate, does not use audience-specific tone and vocabulary is not tied to the purpose of the research.

(1-2 pts.)

Presentation is somewhat exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully speak from the correct point of view. Vocabulary didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.

(3-4 pts.)

Presentation is mostly exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully speak from the correct point of view and/or vocabulary didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.

(5 pts.)

Presentation exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and spoke from an “employee to supervisor” point of view. Vocabulary tied to the purpose of the research.

Digital Fluency:

For the PowerPoint, employ formatting features such as proper use of design themes, transitions, animation, and photos/clipart to produce professional presentation. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate. Didn’t include any PowerPoint formatting.

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of PowerPoint formatting. Some elements were still missing

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors. Small elements of PowerPoint formatting were missing.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows a complete understanding of PowerPoint formatting.

Digital Fluency:

Used screen capture software such as Screencast-o-matic to record video. Video captured both the student’s voice and PowerPoint Slides. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Total Points Possible

100

Insufficient/Not Evident

Progressing

Competent

Exemplary

Earned Points

Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation

(10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English grammar and mechanics observed. Proper writing mechanics were not used.

(4-6 pts.)

6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing mechanics somewhat used.

(7-8 pts.)

3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing mechanics mostly used.

(9-10 pts.)

0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation.

Paper meets minimum 4-page length requirement (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

Paper is not submitted.

(4-6 pts.)

Paper is less than 1 page in length

(7-8 pts.)

Paper is between 2-3 pages in length

(9-10 pts.)

Paper is at least 4 full pages in length.

Included either a memo, agenda, information sheet, or PowerPoint highlighting the Ryan White Act’s Parts

(10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Transferrable Skills

Communication:

Discuss the purpose of the five Parts in the Ryan White Care Act. (15 Max Point Value)

(0-4pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(5-8 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(8-11 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(12-15 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Communication:

Discussed other viewpoints or opposing viewpoints of the Act. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Critical Thinking:

Discusses if there is a need for the Ryan White Care Act with the Affordable Care Act. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Information Literacy:

Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a minimum of 3 credible, academic sources. Used proper APA format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

No sources used. No elements of APA formatting used.

(4-6 pts.)

More than one of the required sources is missing from the research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Some elements of APA formatting used. Did not include in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

(7-8 pts.)

One of the required sources is missing from the research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Most elements of APA formatting used and/or did not include in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

(9-10 pts.)

Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a minimum of 3 credible, academic sources. Used proper APA format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted material.

Communication:

Discusses the reason for the communication format (5 Max Point Value)

(0 pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate

(1-2 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.

(3-4 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.

(5 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.

Communication:

In the communication format, used audience specific language, clarity of voice, and pronunciation of words. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

Presentation is inappropriate, does not use audience-specific tone and vocabulary is not tied to the purpose of the research.

(4-6 pts.)

Presentation is somewhat exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully speak from the correct point of view. Vocabulary didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.

(7-8 pts.)

Presentation is mostly exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully speak from the correct point of view and/or vocabulary didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.

(9-10 pts.)

Presentation exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and spoke from an “employee to supervisor” point of view. Vocabulary tied to the purpose of the research.

Communication:

For the communication format, employ formatting features appropriate for the format selected to create a professional presentation. (10 Max Point Value)

(0-3 pts.)

Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate. Didn’t include any proper formatting corresponding with communication format.

(4-6 pts.)

Content shows a basic understanding of proper formatting corresponding with communication format. Some elements were still missing

(7-8 pts.)

Content meets criteria with minimal errors. Small elements of proper formatting corresponding with communication format were missing.

(9-10 pts.)

Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows a complete understanding proper formatting corresponding with communication format.