CAN YOU DO THIS FOR ME: DUE 8/25/2019 ATTACHED IS A COPY OF THE BOOK FOR CLASS The answers to each Case Study must be 3 - 5 pages in length and completed in current APA formatting. The statements in
BUSI 643
CASE STUDY GRADING RUBRIC
Student:
Criteria (100 Points) | Levels of Achievement | |||
Content 70% | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not present |
Topic, domains and concepts (35 points) | 35 to 32 points Clearly addresses the topic assigned, stays on topic, evaluates all domains, comprehensive in content, uses terms and concepts from reading, demonstrates clarity of expression. Statements are supported by at least 1 scholarly source, correctly cited. | 31 to 29 points Addresses the topic assigned, stays on topic, evaluates most domains, discusses content, uses terms and concepts from reading, demonstrates clarity of expression. Statements are supported by at least 1 scholarly source. | 28 to 1 points Does a poor to fair job of addressing the topic assigned, stays on topic, evaluates some domains, discusses content, uses terms and concepts from reading, demonstrates clarity of expression. Statements are supported by at least 1 scholarly source. | 0 points Failing. Student shows evidence of refusal or inability to provide the required content. |
Work Habits (30 points) | 30 to 28 points Superior work in all areas. Student consistently exceeds minimal expectations in all areas regarding content analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of topics, participation, timeliness, and writing style. | 27 to 25 points Good work in most areas. Student demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding content, analysis, writing style, and/or participation. | 24 to 1 points Poor to fair work in most areas. Student exhibits need for improvement in most areas regarding content, analysis, writing style, and/or participation. | 0 points Failing. Student shows evidence of refusal or inability to meet minimum standards of work. |
Personal application (5 points) | 5 points The student provides thorough applications as a result of his/her professional life. | 4 points The student provides good applications as a result of his/her professional life. | 3 to 1 points The student provides poor to fair applications as a result of his/her professional life. | 0 points The student provides zero applications as a result of his/her professional life. |
Structure 30% | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not present |
APA Formatting (10 points) | 10 points APA format followed, organizes content under APA headings, no large filler quotes, clearly does not plagiarize, clearly finds supportive reasons in reading and applies them in the case study. APA-formatted reference list and in-text citations are included. | 9 to 8 points APA format followed most of the time, incorrect headings used, no large filler quotes, does not plagiarize, finds supportive reasons in reading and applies them in the case study. Reference list, in-text citations, and headings contain 2 – 5 errors. | 7 to 1 points APA format inconsistent throughout; missing headings; some large filler quotes; does not plagiarize; finds few supportive reasons in reading and applies them in the case study; reference list, in-text citations, and headings contain more than 5 errors. | 0 points APA format was not followed; large filler quotes present; does not plagiarize; does not find supportive reasons in reading or apply them in the case study; reference list and in-text citations are not included. |
Spelling, Grammar and Mechanics (10 points) | 10 points The Case Study begins with a title/cover page and was typed in 12-point Times New Roman fonts on all pages; all pages were double-spaced; 1-inch margins on all four sides were used.
Correct spelling and grammar were present throughout. Correct punctuation and spacing were present throughout. The paper was typed in a formal style, and written in the third person. No more than 1 error was present. | 9 to 8 points Some errors with the title/cover page, 12-point Times New Roman fonts, double-spacing; or 1-inch margins were present.
Some errors with spelling and/or grammar were present. Some errors with punctuation and spacing were present. Some errors with formal style and/or third person were present. 2 – 5 errors were present. | 7 to 1 points Significant errors with the title/cover page, 12-point Times New Roman fonts, double-spacing; or 1-inch margins were present.
Significant errors with spelling and/or grammar were present. Significant errors with punctuation and spacing were present. Significant errors with formal style and/or third person were present. More than 5 errors were present. | 0 points Errors with spelling, grammar, and/or mechanics were so pervasive that the readability and level of scholarship of the paper were substantially reduced. |
Page count (10 points) | 10 points At least 3 complete pages of original graduate-level analysis, evaluation, and discussion (plus title page, reference page, and tables or figures). | 9 to 8 points At least 2.9 pages of original graduate-level analysis, evaluation, and discussion (plus title page, reference page, and tables or figures). | 7 to 1 points 2.0 – 2.8 pages of original graduate-level analysis, evaluation, and discussion (plus title page, reference page, and tables or figures). | 0 points Less than 2 pages submitted. |
/100 |
Page 3 of 3