Write a minimum of two pages in which you analyze how an organization can use ground rules and dialogue to grow as a learning organization. The team learning discipline helps a team sustain and reinfo

Analyze the value of dialogue in helping teams learn and change. 

Does not describe the value of dialogue in helping teams learn and change. 

Describes the value of dialogue in helping teams learn and change. 

Analyzes the value of dialogue in helping teams learn and change. 

Analyzes the value of dialogue in helping teams learn and change, supporting analysis with theory or real-world examples. 

Describe the ground rules required to reach conversational level in a dialogue. 

Does not describe the ground rules. 

Describes the ground rules but does not connect ground rules to the requirements needed to reach conversational level in a dialogue.

Describes the ground rules required to reach conversational level in a dialogue. 

Analyzes the ground rules required to reach conversational level in a dialogue, supporting the analysis with relevant theory and real-world examples. 

Analyze learning related to designing an effective dialogue session. 

Does not describe learning related to designing an effective dialogue session. 

Describes learning related to designing an effective dialogue session. 

Analyzes learning related to designing an effective dialogue session. 

Analyzes learning related to designing an effective dialogue session and provides recommendations for improving the design. 

Analyze the ease or difficulty of conversing in a team dialogue session, including the dangers and obstacles. 

Does not describe the ease or difficulty of conversing in a team dialogue session, or the dangers and obstacles. 

Describes the ease or difficulty of conversing in a team dialogue session, or the dangers and obstacles, but not both. 

Analyzes the ease or difficulty of conversing in a team dialogue session, including the dangers and obstacles. 

Analyzes the ease or difficulty of conversing in a team dialogue session, including the dangers and obstacles, providing real-world examples. 

Define and compare debate, discussion, and dialogue.

Does not define or compare debate, discussion, or dialogue.

Defines and compares debate, discussion, or dialogue, but not all three.

Defines and compares debate, discussion, and dialogue.

Defines and compares debate, discussion, and dialogue; and provides real-world examples of each.