Please help with this assignment. Strictly follow the attached rubric and address each topic.
IHP 430 Module One Case Study Guidelines and Rubric
Case Study: Single-Event Analysis – The Wrong Patient
Review the case study in Chapter 5 (Ross, 2014).
After the initial patient misidentification, what systemic reasons can you identify that lead to subsequent caregivers not recognizing that the patient transferred to, prepped for, and undergoing surgery was not the right patient?
Use the three components of root cause analysis to evaluate the following.
How significant was the role of data collection and data analysis in measuring the chronology of events? Explain.
From your perspective, what steps should have been taken to avoid this latent medical error?
Evaluate why and how humans produce errors and what precautions should have been taken in this case study.
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper should be submitted as a one- to two-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
| Critical Elements | Exemplary (100%) | Proficient (80%) | Needs Improvement (70%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
| Significance of the Data Collection Role | Meets or exceeds “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates in- depth knowledge of the significance of the role of data collection and data analysis in measuring the chronology of events | Identifies the significance of the role of data collection and data analysis with an explanation supporting the response | Identifies the significance of the role of data collection and data analysis but with gaps in explanation | Does not identify the significance of the role of data collection and data analysis in measuring the chronology of events | 30 |
| Steps to Avoid the Latent Medical Error | Meets or exceeds “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates in- depth steps that should be taken to avoid this latent medical error | Describes steps that should have been taken to avoid this latent medical error | Describes some steps that should have been taken to avoid this latent medical error, but some steps are missing from explanation | Does not describe steps that should have been taken to avoid this latent medical error | 30 |
| Evaluate Why and How Humans Produce Errors | Meets or exceeds “Proficient” criteria by successfully evaluating how human error occurs and outlines ways to prevent them by showing in- depth knowledge and scholarly examples to support findings | Successfully evaluates how human errors occur and outlines ways to prevent them | Evaluates how humans produce errors but does not describe precautions that should have been taken | Does not evaluate causes of human errors or offer precautions that should be taken | 30 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to- read format | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas | 10 |
| Earned Total | 100% |
