Create a ten to twelve (11) slide presentation in which you: Create a title slide and references section (as indicated in the format requirements below). Narrate each slide using detailed speaker not

Running Head: LEADERSHIP THEORIES AND STYLES

Theories of Leadership

8/3/19

Leadership Theories

The general conduct of the public is determined by who is leading and in charge of the public. These people who regulate and govern the general behavior and the course of action that is observed by the general public is referred to as a public leader. A public leader thus governs his/her people from their offices that have legal positions for and responsible for their respective office functionality. To lead people, you need to have leadership personalities that are inbuilt in you. These traits cannot be acquired merely from professional institutions, and when acquired, they are not effective like when one is born with them.

This argument for a public leader being equipped with inborn personalities is supported by two theories, the great man theory, and the trait theory. With the grand man theory, a public leader personality should intermarry with the expectation of the public. Personal intrinsic factors determine how they associate with others and the feeling they have for others. To site this inborn public leader personalities, some people are good at social participation while others are not. From the great man theory, people who have been born with the perfect social association and participation skills make good public leaders (Wong, Ramalu & Chuah, 2019).

From the trait theory, this theory supports inborn public leaders de to what they portray about themselves (Henkel, Marion & Bourdeau, D 2019). Due to the human ego that everyone has, here are those per5sonalities that cannot allow everyone pursues leadership and when they do, they might not be compatible with their subjects, in this case, their followers. For a public leader, they must be intelligent enough to understand metrics f public participation. For a person without such a trait, even after equipping them with professional public leadership skills, they might never fit for public leadership office.

Public leaders use certain leadership styles that introduce their mode of leadership as one which emanates within them. From how they take themselves in the office, they identify themselves as the perfect match for the office from the leadership styles that they adopt to match their inborn traits of a public leader. In most cases, per5fect public leaders adopt pace-setting techniques of leadership and also the democratic style of leadership. These two styles, among others, are adopted by born public leaders' because they match their trait of social interaction they were born with.

Not everyone can lead by examples to be role model calls for intrinsic personalities. Taking responsibility by yourself requires not professional skills but inborn personalities. People can get educated on leadership skills, but they might not be able to lead by example. Leading by example takes a personal understanding of the influence that this strategy has thus the person who does not have the knowledge and appreciation of this strategy, educated or not might be effective. To set the pace to be followed by others requires personal attributes that encourage someone towards the role of leadership. To set the pace to be followed requires special understanding of different people's personalities and how to harmonize them together to achieve the desired public leadership goal.

With democratic leadership, not everyone can lead from their professional acquired skills and knowledge. Some people might get mislead by their professional acquisitions to think they have a total say in public leader. A public leader understands that people are well-governed when they are given that chance to contribute positively to their governance. Ability to engage others and rely on their attributes and contribution in decision making is a factor of personalities. Take, for instance, an introvert; they might never acknowledge democratic leadership and take leadership entirely as their responsibility.

Leadership Differences

There are differences that measure metrics of a leader's success in a public setting, private setting, and in non-profit making organizations. The compatible leadership strategy used in any of this setting might differ with leadership style in other contexts. However, the difference in adopted leadership strategy and leadership theory adopted in one environment might differ in another setting, but the overall goal is the success of leaders in each of these settings. There are some strategies that might be misleading in public sector leadership, but the same might facilitate the success of a leader in a non-profit making organization. This differences in the course of action taken by the leadership in these setting introduce leadership as a context that cannot be universalized to get its effective functionality in different environmental settings.

Take, for instance, the difference in leadership strategy employed in the public sector and one employed in the private sector. Public sector acknowledges the contribution of all for a common goal, but this is different in a private sector setting (Lee & Schachter, 2019). In a private sector setting, a leader in such a position is geared to realize their personal goals and objectives they do not thus mind others contribution in achieving this goal, and they take it entirely as their responsibility for the leadership style they adopt in this setting is authoritative leadership style and with no dispute their realize their goals and target within the set time. This, however, is a bit different from how the success of a leader in a public setting is to realize success in their leadership by engaging all in decision making. The actual participating and inclusion of leadership is a leadership style called a democratic leadership style. In both sets, leaders are successful in attaining their goals but the leadership style adopted in these setting differs. Such is a difference between successful leaders in a pubic setting and private setting.

Leadership Behavior

The desired leader, both in a public setting and private setting are one who has leadership traits that they were born and nurtured through professional knowledge. An influential leader in these two settings s in most cases which are taken to be a leader. However, this requirement for a born leader might deviate in a non-profit making organization. Non-profit making organization is meant to meet the interest of the involved parties. In cases where none of these parties is wiling for leadership, this does not mean that the non-profit organization won't have leadership responsible for its management. In these cases, the interested parties in the non-profit making organization in question are forced to teach someone on leadership who take charge of leadership for the success of the organization. The success, in this case, differs in the type of leader who is responsible for the daily operation of the setting in question. The public and private sectors are well and best served by leaders who have leadership traits they were born with, but this is not fundamental for a leader in anon-profit making an organization.

I think for a perfect leader, they are geared with inborn personalities but due to a situation, needs and challenges they are subjected to their leadership is defined and molded to which type of a leader they can make and become. To cite introverts, this is a personality that one is born with, and whether efforts are made to equip such a person with leadership, their characters might not allow them. It requires someone with natural personalities that conforms to leadership requirements. When a need arises, and such people are challenged to take chances and confront the situation, they stand out against all the odds and make good successful leaders (Rhode, 2019). That is one that leadership is an essential factor that is accelerated and nurtured through experiences, needs, and challenges that one is subjected to. In conclusion, not everyone can make a leader, but it requires natural personalities one was born with to fit in leadership. These personalities enable such people to confront needs and challenges they are subjected top, and their success, as well as that of others, introduces them as leaders.

REFERENCES:

Wong, H. C., Ramalu, S. S., & Chuah, F. (2019). AN OVERVIEW OF LEADERSHIP AND THE EMERGING OF RELATIONAL LEADERSHIP. Journal of Human Resource and Leadership, 4(1), 32-43.

Henkel, T. G., Marion Jr, J. W., & Bourdeau, D. T. (2019). Project Manager Leadership Behavior: Task-Oriented Versus Relationship-Oriented. Journal of Leadership Education, 18(2), 1.

Lee, Y., & Schachter, H. L. (2019). Exploring the relationship between trust in government and citizen participation. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(5), 405-416.

Rhode, D. L. (2019). Preparing Leaders: The Evolution of a Field and the Stresses of Leadership. Santa Clara Law Review, 58(3), 411.